Take a photo of a barcode or cover
199 reviews by:
samdalefox
Lui's approach and style is the complete opposite of my favourite sci-fi short story writer, James Tiptree Jr. Tiptree's work immerses you in the story immediately, she is able to get you to understand the universe and the science at play without directly explaining it, you figure it out from context or slow reveal. She also focuses on biological determinism and on the 'small' in relation to the 'great'. Lui is the opposite. He takes a direct approach, usually having a paragraph or two directly summarising the relevant physics laws for this story, and his focus is on cosmology, specific laws of physics, and engineering. He focuses on the 'great' in relation to the 'small'. These explanations perhaps sometimes necessary, but they're not as fun to read. It is clear that Lui has deep understanding, respect, and awe for these sciences.
Overall, I became a bit bored with the overly technical ones. I also found it hard to feel anything other than despair a lot of the time. Many themes pointed to a large, calculated, determined, cold, universe, where humans are incidental tiny stupid creatures impacted by forces way beyond their imagination and control. The best stories were 'Contraction' and 'Mirror'. I've seen many other reviewers rate these highly too. I think this is because in these stories Lui uses the science ('greatness') to impact the 'smallness' (people) and really follows through and how it impacts them. They felt more real than a lot of the other stories. I will go on to read his full novel 'The Three Body Problem."
Other topics explored: the limtiations and shortsightedness of humanity and the futility of violence, emphasis of the importance of the natural (biological, chemical) world for carbon life forms, the nature of the individual (here Liu takes almost the exact same storyline as Ken Lui's short story 'The Waves' 2012 but with variations in commentary, fate and free will, the pitfalls of dependence upon technology, potentially anti-war sentiments, the philosophy of art and its importance/place in civilisation (I don't think he nailed this one, but he tried).
List of short stories included and individual ratings:
The village teacher - 3.5
The time migration - 3.75
2018-04-01 - 3.75
Fire in the earth - 3.0
Contraction - 4.0
Mirror - 4.5
Ode to joy - 3.5
Full spectrum barrage jumping - 2.5
Sea of dreams - 3.75
Cloud of poems - 2.75
The thinker - 2.75
Total = 37.75/11 = 3.43
3.5 ⭐ average
Quotes
"The mountains were one of the most impoverished areas in the country. But worse than the poverty was the apathy of the people toward their own condition."
"The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible... The most comprehensible thing about the universe is that it is incomprehensible"
"War is economics"
"We're beyond the time that knowledge can explain everything"
"The truth of the situation had still not been disclosed, leading to this kind of coordination issue"
"Once the secrets are out, the province's entire economy and political structure will be dead in the water! And we don't know, and have no way of predicting, what even worse consequ might arise from so large scale and severe a disturbance...we progressed along the road if history to today because of balance, arising from the happy medium between various elements. To abandon balance and seek an extreme is a sign of immaturity in politics".
"Imagine if DNA never made mistakes, always replicating and inherting with perfect fidelity. What would life on Earth become?... life would no longger exist on Earth. The basis for the evolution of life is mutation, caused by mistakes in DNA...Society is the same way. It's evolution and vitality is rooted in the myriad urges and desires departing from the morality laid out by the majority. A fish can't live in perfectly clear water. A society where no one ever makes mistakes in ethics is, in reality, dead."
"We both take advantage of ordinary objects in our world to enlarge and extend our abilities."
"You've got it backward, Papa. If everyone were like us and spent all their life on exploring the universe, they'd understand its beauty, the beauty that lies behind its vastness and depth. And someone who truly understood that beauty of space and nature would never go to war."
"Art is the only reason for a civilisation to exist...fuck that I have plenty of reasons to go on".
"For the forseeable future, humanity's existence would be extremely difficult. Nevertheless, at least existence was possible. Most people felt content with that. Indeed, the Ring of Ice Era made humanity learn contentment."
"Li Bai saw nature like you see the girls down by the riverside. But in technolgoy's eyes, nature is its components, perfectly arrayed and dripping blood on a white cloth. Therefore technology is antithetical to poetry."
"That Li Bai's race had preserved their individual existences also somewhat explained their extraordinary ability to grasp art."
The book focuses on the West and global North almost exclusively, and primarily looks at the relationship of gender and the meat and dairy industry (objectification, control, rape, death, consumption, commodification). It does have two sections on the further intersection with racism, I would like to have seen this area more thoroughly explored. The book constrains itself to a binary approach to gender. Additionally, I was surprised at how little veganism is explored. Veganism is first explicitly introduced in the 'animalized Vs feminized protein' section about 30% of the way in. It is recognised as the logical conclusion of the feminist-vegetarian critical theory, but little time is spent on it. (See page 63 of this edition, section 'new naming: Vegan' for a good explanation of the evolution of the term and ideology.)
Overall, I think this is an important peice of work with copious literature evidence supplied, most of which is convincing. The most important concept to first grasp is the 'absent referent', I found some of the language was unnecessarily academic and repetitive, especially in this critical section. This is common trend I've found in critical theory texts. I appreciate the inclusion of 'body mediated knowledge' and I particularly found the analysis of the links between meat-eating, patriachy, and war very interesting and the analysis of the slaughterhouse dissembly line with respect to capitalism.
TLDR: interesting topic, critical analyses, most parts have aged well, could do with updating in some sections, could benefit from an agressive editor, still relevant to today.
Selected quotes:
"The hierachy of meat protein reinforces and hierachy of race, class, and sex."
"As often as Herman had witnessed the slaughter of animals and fish, he had always thought the same thought: in their behaviour towards creatures, all men were Nazis. The smugness with which man could do with other species as he pleased exemplified the most extreme racist theories, the principle that might is right." - Isaac Bashevus Singer, Enemies: A love story
"The men...were better hunters than the women, but only because the women had found they could live quite well on foods other than meat." - Alice Walker, The Temple of my familiar.
"The absent referent, because of its absence, prevents us from experiencing connections between oppressed groups. Cultural images of butchering and sexual violence are so interpenetrated that animals act as the absent referent in radiacal feminist discourse. In this sense radical feminist theory participates in the same set of representational structures it seeks to expose. We uphold the patriachial structure of absent referents, appropriating the experience of animals to interpret our own violations."
"Despite this dependence on the imagery of butchering, radical feminist discourse has failed to integrate the literal oppression of animals into our analysis of patriachal culture or to acknowledge the strong historical alliance between feminism and vegetarianism. Whereas women may feel like pieces of meat, and be treated like pieces of meat - emotionally butchered and physically battered - animals actually are made into pieces of meat."
"The institution of butchering is unique to human beings. All carnivore animals kill and consume their prey themselves. They see and hear their victims before they eat them. The is no absent referent, only a dead one... We have no bodily agency for killing and dismembering the animals we eat; we require implements... Without implemental violence human beings could not eat meat. Violence is central to the act of slaughtering."
"Those who are againist facism without being against capitalism, who lament over the barbarism that comes out of the barbarism, are like people who wish to eat their veal without slaughtering the calf" - Bertolt Brecht, Writing the truth: Five difficulties
"Metaphoric borrowing that depends upon violation yet fails to protest the originating violence does not acknowledge interlocking oppressions. Our goal is to resist the violence that separate matter from spirit, to eliminate the structure that reates absent referents."
"Vegetarians face the problem of making their meanings understood within a dominant culture that accepts the legitimacy of meat eating...The theory of dominance-mutedness explains why vegetarians are not heard by the dominant culture...muted groups must mediate their beliefs through the allowable forms of dominant structures".
"Vegetarianism does more than rebuke a meat-eating society; it rebukes a patriarchal society, since as we have seen meat eating is associated with male power. Colonialist British (male) Beefeaters are not viewed positively if you do not approve of eating beef, male control, or colonialism."
Minor: Animal death, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Torture, Violence, Cannibalism, Murder, War, Classism
The Tragedy of the Worker: Towards the Proletarocene
Richard Seymour, China Miéville, Jamie Allinson, Rosie Warren
The text starts with a gripping opening: "Workers of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your chains. You have a world to win. What if the world is already lost? This is the question that vexed us as we set out to write The Tragedy of the Worker.... It is now clear that we will pass what scientists have long warned will be the tipping point of global warming, accelerating the already catastrophic consequences of capitalist emissions. How do we imagine emancipation on an at best partially habitable Earth?" This question is genuinely interesting and I want to hear the answers and discussion around it. The thing is.... the essay does not do this.
The authors do not at any point address what we could do as socialists if the world we inherit is not viable/habitable. How we could survive, how we could thrive. They spend the entire text rehashing arguments made elsewhere about the relationship between captial and the climate crisis. Worse still, while rehashing they do not reference specific sources (absolutely unforgivable, and no a list of 'further reading' is not an adequate substitution), and they use pompous rhetorical language that is offputting to readers.
On the last two pages they mention 'salvage communism' but decline to say anything further about it. I assume it's some grandiose thinking underpinning the authors' 'Salavage Collective'. The only other part indicating relevance to the initial question posed is a wild claim that "speculation about a post capitalist future is verboten and necessarily so. [paraphrased]" I have so many issues with this, I don't know where to begin and it would be unfair to spew my unrefined counter points here. One clear criticism is, if speculation is verboten, what the fuck are you doing with this fucking essay then? How are you not participating in 'Nowhilism' and doomerism that you criticise. Who is this for? How is it helpful? The answer is that it's not. I have salvaged a few peices of information of interest from this text, but due to the lack of sources I will need to undertake the leg work myself. Another user's review below sums up my feelings accurately and I have copied my favourite quotes from the text below. I do not recommend reading the full text however. You will not glean anything further beyond what is contained in the quote itself.
frasersimons's review:
"Yet, who is this for. Massive amounts of time is naturally dedicated to codifying the numerous tragedies of the worker. So, why ask a rhetorical question, like why is this book not for the average worker. It crosses into the masturbatory quite often with its diction and insipid references and jargon. Add that to another tragedy."
Quotes:
"Humanity is thus a a symbiotically evolving , globally interconnected, technologically enhanced microbial system." - Margulis
"Ecologists should not waste their time telling the rich to share".
"The real abstraction is the social basis of capitalist implicatory denial: the seemingly evidence-proof conviction of capitalist states that capitalogenic climate change can be remedied by means, and according to systems, that guarantee it's perpetuation."
"All realistic solutions, define by capitalist realism, are inadequate. All adequate solutions, defined by the exigency of the crisis, are unrealistic."
Ideas that are deemed... "Unrealistic, is an indication of how much would have to be achieved,and how quickly consent gained for radical new ideas, coalitions assembled, tactics innovated, the unthinkable realised."
"It is, unfortunately, not impossible for distinctly fascist solutions to climate change to be imposed, along despotic and ultimately genocidal lines. The mise-anthropo-scene presents ample opportunities for various lines of racist, patriachal and militarist policy to be represented as mitigatory, or adaptive - and, from within the predicates of fascism, such policies would in fact be mitigatious and adaptations. The very aspects of ecological disaster which throw capitalism into crisis, and which indicate the need for social mobilisation tantamount to war, are just those which could give rise to a far-right climate leviathan, whith the military organising what the bourgeoisie cannot."
"Pity would be no more. If we did not make somebody poor" - William Blake
"Like most geoengineering proposals, their possible and possible irreversible effects of regional life and remote weather systems are poorly understood, and yet they are vaunted with astonishingly little cognisance of what that means."
"The onrush of catastophe does have a temporality of its own... It imposes tight constraints on those who want to fight." - Andreas Malm
"The language of 'sustainable development' Gareth Dale points out, has become the language of sustained capitalist growth. It has become the language of implicatory denial. Capitalist states proclaiming the objective of 'zero net emissions' while their means entail the massive expansion of emissions. 'Green economies expanding airports and extending motorways. The unsinkable rubber duck of 'green capitalism'."
"The majority of carbon emissions in the entire history of humanity, as David Wallace-Wells starkly reports, have been produced since the Earth Summit in 1992."
"The pivot of imperialism today is not direct political control of territory. It is rather a global, liberal, properly rights regime, policed by everyone from the US Trade Representative to the European Commission, backed by the power of the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve and Wall Street, supported by capitalist classes from Paris to Beijing and secured by violence 'in the last instance'.
"Of course it is always and only profit that will be prioritised."
"According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations) 30 percent of cereals grown for human and animal consumption are wasted, along with almost half of all root crops, fruits and vegetables. To conclude from this grotesque squander that a 'more efficient' capitalism would 'solve the problem' of 'the environment' would be to fail to understand wate, capitalism and ecology: that the first is intrinsic to the second; that the second whatever the degree to which it is inflected by the first, in imicable to the third." (Jeven's paradox is also relevant here).
"In May of 2020, levels of CO2 in the atmosphere het 417 parts per million, the highest ever recorded - and the first breach of 400ppm since the Pliocene."
"To learn which questions are unanswerable, and not to answer them: this skill is most needful in times of stress and darkness" - Ursula K. le Guin
The novel 'Chinese Whispers' was good, and made sense as the final installment since it had a big ramp up on the personal toll the main murder mystery took on the protagnists. However, it didn't feel like a closing book to me and the ending was VERY sudden. I was surprised there wasn't another book afterwards. One point that I think was a particularly nice edition was the time spent on Dai Lao and Li's dad. All in all, another enjoyable edition, and I'm sad to see the series over.
Moderate: Death, Gore, Blood, Medical content, Murder
Pros
- The setting is back in Beijing
- Interesting commentary on the effects of capitalism and globalisation on the local residents e.g., displacement in the run up to the Beijing Olympics, and widening wealth inequality.
- Li and Margaret are finally trying to commit to each other, there are much less petty, unecessary conflicts.
- Clear call out on racist behaviours and the difficulties in inter-racial/cultural partnerships being accepted
- The murder conspiracy plot was much less prominent than in other books in this series. It wasn't until the 80% mark that we made any real progress with this subplot and started to tie different threads together. There was significantly less autopsy/medical content than previously, despite it still being relevant to the storyline.
- The murder conspiracy plot also wasn't as interesting in my opinion as previous storylines. It also loses some of twist/'oomph' by recycling
another genetics story. This brings the count up to 3 (1 with the rice, 2 with the flu virus, now 3 with the endogenous hormone production for athletes) - XinXin was just sort of dropped out of the picture. Like many characters before her, if not directly relevant to Li and Margaret right now, then we don't really hear anything about what happened to them and how they're doing.
Minor: Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Miscarriage, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual content, Blood, Medical content, Murder, Pregnancy, Injury/Injury detail, Classism
Moderate: Trafficking
Minor: Death, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Medical content, Medical trauma, Sexual harassment, Deportation, Pandemic/Epidemic
The major frustation for me with the ongoing (and in my opinion inexplicable) tension between Margaret and Li Yan. I mean, from what we learn in the book, I would expect them to be very happy in each others' company and more familiar with each others' pressure points now. The love triangle was completely unecessary and distracting. Great summary from another reader: "There is too much drama surrounding an adolescent-like relationship between two seasoned professionals, most of which could be resolved through an honest conversation... I hope to see some character growth in the next entry. Perhaps Margaret who considers Beijing her home now could learn to speak Mandarin?". There are also some casual racist and ablist language used, which I'm unsure is reflective of the characters and the time it was set in or a reflective of the author himself. Either way, I still really enjoyed reading and looking forward to the next installment. In hoping that we don't go through yet again another separation and coming together.
Moderate: Medical content, Medical trauma, Abortion
Minor: Ableism, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Trafficking, Pregnancy, Sexual harassment
Minor: Bullying, Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, Xenophobia, Murder
Specifics to the first in the series 'The Firemaker', Peter May clearly knows and loves writing about Beijing and the Chinese police. I also like the characterisation of all the characters. Yes Li and Maragret (especially Margaret) are a little caricaturish to emphasise culture differences and are largely unlikeable, but they're interesting to read. I especially loved Yongli, Lotus, and Old Yifu. The time is was set in is also interesting as you see Beijing becoming more globalised as it accepts capitalism. The pace moved at a steady pace and although I had guessed the overarching theme/motive/big baddie (again, very relevant for the time it was set in), there were still plenty of twists and little shocks that got me, especially in the last third of the book!
Minor: Racism, Sexual content, Xenophobia, Police brutality, Medical content, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Injury/Injury detail
There were some important themes covered that felt all to believable in the present day (2023):
- “It’s guilt: mass guilt, generational guilt. The olds feel they irretrievably fucked up the world, then allowed us to be born in it. You know what? It’s true. That’s exactly what they did. They know it, we know it. Everybody knows it”
- Classism - The elites, the generational and class differences i.e. who becomes a 'defender', the others, the help (forced labour) etc.
- Acknowledgement that so much about survival as a refugee is about luck.
- Changing allegiances/solidarity to different groups you are part of and feeling of betrayal - from your family, your coutnrymen, your colleagues. All explored in a nuanced way.
- Military mindset (my sister is currently in the British Army, the culture described in the book is spot on, and frankly, depressing.)
The most interesting character for me was the captain and I had quite a few questions about the world after the change. For example,
Review from another member who has a different emphasis, but I also agree with:
"It's a character driven story, so there isn't a huge amount of world building beyond life on the wall, but that is described in bone-chilling detail. A rare visit home highlights the gulf between Joseph's generation and that of his parents - they had it all and their children are paying the price.
It lacked the bite and viscerality of human suffering that would make a compelling story. The deaths are quick, almost bloodless, and the main characters face none of the privitation of a world wracked by drought and famine (apart from at the very end). They live in a controlled world surrounded by giant sea walls that they must serve two years of duty defending. Despite the suggestion of an elite upper class living in luxury as something the main character aspired to, he essentially was living a well provided for life with plentiful food, shelter and friends. The wall amounted to a period of military service.
Minor: Death, Violence, Xenophobia, Injury/Injury detail, Classism