You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

199 reviews by:

samdalefox

Filter
challenging dark mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: N/A
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Short stories fall into three categories for me. 1) Self contained, 2) a satisfying/interesting snippet suggesting at a wider world/story, and 3) a snippet that suggests at a wider world/story and could realistically be expanded into a full novella or novel. 

The New Atlantis falls into category 3 for me. This easily could have been a full length fantasy-eque climate-change dystopian novel, and I would have loved it. However, I think the way this is crafted as a short story works beautifully and has no need to be developed into a longer piece. The snippets of information we get builds a picture of the totalitarian (potentially eco-facist?) society that has emerged from the climate crisis. I really enjoyed the switching of narratives between Belle and the underwater creatures; a new civilisation emerging from the old - one in which humans live in harmony with their fellow creatures and the natural environment.    

The persecuted scientists (Simon et al.) and Belle, despite their obvious dejection and misery are intent on preserving the dream of a better world rather than the exploitative and unsustainable one of late capitalism. Le Guin's story is a reminder of the human capacity to keep dreaming of better worlds no matter how grim the actual situation. "It is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism". We must have strength, courage, and solidarity to imagine and build that better world. 

adventurous mysterious reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

To quote another community member: "The Duniest Dune yet, Children of Dune contains more plotting, more power, and more long obsessive intercourse with fate." This Dune mashes up the action we enjoyed from the first installment, along with many passages of philosophical reflection we experienced in the second. I still enjoyed the Dune universe, though the pacing was inconsistent which made it sometimes a joy, sometimes a slog, to read. I was also disappointed in the lack of development or consistent characterisation in our established characters besides Leto II. This lack is especially clear in the women, Jessica is underserved and done an injustice in this book which is just sad to see.

Although I do enjoy the Dune universe, I think I'll be leaving the series here. I'm not interested enough in the golden path autocracy, eugenics, and yet more gholas. I may consider reading the prequel about the Butlerian jihad, though this was written by Frank Herbert's son. 

amortristis's review:

"Children of Dune is... a lot. It’s a story about change and ensuing identity crises. It’s a story about suicide, metaphorical and literal; (ego) death. It’s about what makes a person no longer a person and makes them, instead, a monster. It’s about the future and how far some will go to pursue a particular vision."

Favourite Quotes:


 “Every judgement teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous.” 

"It was the religion of Muad'Dib that upset Stilgar most. Why did they make a god of Muad'Dib? Why deify a man known to be flesh?

"Too much knowledge never makes for simple decisions"

 "When your actions describe a stystem of evil consequences, you should be judged by those consequences and not by those explanations."

"A sophisicated human can become primitive. What this really means is that the human's way of life changes. Old values change, become linked to the landscape with its plants and animals. This new existence requires a working knowledge of those multiple and cross-linked events usually referred to as nature. It requires  ameasure of respect for the inertial power within such natural systems. When a human gains this working knowledge and respect, that is called 'being primitive'. The converse, of course, is equally true: the primitive can become sophisicated, but not without accepting dreadful psychological damage."

"A large populace held in check by a small but powerful force is quite a common situation in our universe. And we know the conditions wherein this large populace may turn upon its keepers - One: When they find a leader. This is the most volatile threat to the powerful; they must retain control of leaders. Two: When the populace recognizes its chains. Keep the populace blind and unquestioning. Three: When the populace perceives a hope of escape from bondage. They must never even beleive that escape is possible!"

"Good government never depends upon laws, but upon the personal qualites of those who govern. The machinery of government is always subordinate to the will of those who administer that machinery. The most important element of government, therefore, is the method of choosing leaders."

"Each planet has it own period, and each life likewise."

"In all major socializing forces you will find an underlying movement to gain and maintain power through the use of words....A goverened populace must be conditioned to accept word-power as actual things, to confuse the symoblized system with the tangible universe.  In the maintenance of such a power structure, certain symbols are kept out of reach of common understanding."

"A memory was not enough...unless its use was known and its value revealed to judgement."

"The generalist looks outwards; he looks for living principles, knowling full well that such principles change, that they develop. It is to the characteristics of change itself that the generalist must look."

"Irony often masks the inability to think beyond one's assumptions."

"As with all religions, your institution moves toward cowardice, mediocrity, inertia and self satisfaction...Is your religion real when it costs you nothing and carries no risk? Is your religion real when you fatten upon it? Is your religion real when you commit atrocities in its name? Whence comes your downward degeneration from the original revelation?"

"To exist is to stand out, away from the background. You aren't really thinking or really ecisting uneless you're willing to risk even your own sanity in the judgment of your existence."

"Humans tend to think of everything in a sequential, world-orientated framework. This mental trap produced very short-term concepts of effectiveness and consequences, a condition of constant, unplanned response to crises."

"To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty."

"Every question, every problem, doesn't have a single correct answer. One must permit diversity. A monolith is unstable. Why do you demand a correct statement from me?"

"Peace demands solutions, but we never reach living solutions; we only work toward them. A fixed solution is, by definition, a dead solution. The trouble with peace is that it tends to punish mistakes instead of rewarding brilliance." 

"Men must want to do things out of their own innermost drives. People, not commercial organizations or chains of command, are what make great civilizations work. Every civilization depends upon the quality of the individuals it produces. If you over-organize humans, over-legalize them, supress their urge to greatness - they cannot work and their civilization collapses."

"Limits of survival are set by climate, these long drifts of change, which a generation may fail to notice. And it is the extremes of climate which set the pattern. Lonely, finite humans may observe climatic provinces, fluctuations of annual weather and may occasionally observe such things as 'This is a colder year that I've ever known'/ Such things are sensible. But humans are seldom alerted to the shifting average through a great span od years. And it is precisely in this alerting that humans leanr how to survive on any planet. The must learn climate."

[In reference to the Butlerian Jihad and computer technology] "The assumption that a whole system can be made to work better through an assualt on its concious elements betrays a dangerous ignorance. This has often been the ignorant approach of those who call themselves scientists and technologists."

challenging hopeful informative inspiring reflective sad medium-paced

I read this as an audiobook, it transferred to the medium well but I think I'll be buying this and re-reading/referring to a physical copy.

The core concepts of 'Against White Feminism' are not new. To well-read intersectional feminists, if you've read Audre Lorde, Kimberlé Crenshaw, and Gayatri Spivak, you'll be familiar with the arguments made here. Several of the examples are already mentioned in other lay books such as the clean stove initiative; a case study already detailed in 'invisible wome'n by Caroline Criado-Perez. However, Zakaria brings her own personal experience to the narrative, and illustrates the arguments with examples focussing on the middle east and south asian countries, some of which were new to me (highlighted below). As such, I learnt many new things as well as hearing the already known and I would recommend all feminists reading it. I would also recommend it, perhaps even more so, to people new to intersectional feminism. Zakaria does an excellent job covering a huge amount of history and theory, whilst keeping the language and arguments largely accessible to likely shocked, defensive, white people.

The whole premise of the book is to describe white feminism, highlight its oppressive flaws, and explain the encompassing benefits of moving towards intersectional feminism. In order to do this white people must decenter and depiviledge ourselves and actively support and promote Black and POC people in the movement. Zakaria ever so briefly touches upon whether Black and POC should dissociate themselves entirely from the movement and have their own exclusive feminism, but ultimately argues for solidarity among all. A triumph of a book, I hope it reaches many people. 
 
White feminist definition: 
A person [of any race] who..." fails to consider the role that whiteness and the racial privilege attached to it have played… in universalizing white feminist concerns, agendas, and beliefs as being those of all feminists."

Bits I particularly liked
  • I particuarly loved the numerous case studies made within British colonialism of India
  • The explanation of compulsorary sexuality and comparison to eastern countries' cultures
  • The entire chapter on FGM and 'honour killings'
  • Emphasising Nancy Fraser, that redistribution is more important and impactful that recognition
  • We need sisterhood and solidarity, not exploitation of intimate spaces for individualistic gain

Bits I think could be improved
  • Class anylases. Zakaria absolutely does perform class anayses throughout. She looks at warfare, white women becoming the oppressor of 'others' in order achieve dominance parity with white men, levels of poverty and access to opportunities, capitalism affecting women through compulsorary sexuality and consumerism etc. But for me the clarity of thought came late in the book and seemed secondary. The class system and capitalism is the generating force behind these things, I strongly believe it should be identified clearly as the primary oppressing structure from which all others are interconnected upon, included white feminism. "Individualism in a very crucial sense is a building block of capitalism". (Produce women as economic producers and consumers, capitalists try to depoliticise as much as possible, and push into meaningless competition instead of solidarity), this should have been indentified clearly in the introduction, not stated 90% of the way through.

New bits for me
  • Gayatri Spivak's subaltern essay - a landmark writing I haven't read
  • Rebellion rather than resilience is recognised in white feminism
  • 'Sultana's dream' - Indian separatism feminist fiction 
  • The origins of the definition of 'Empowerment'
  • Gita Sen - notable Indian feminist scholar
  • 'Believing Women in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur'an' - Asma Barlas
  • The Hindu legal system before British colonialism/imperialism 
  • Doctrine of qisas in Sharia (Islamic) law
  • 'Choice feminism' actually gives me pause for thought. I had never considered the negative implications before. I'm still not sure I fully understand the argument againist it, so I will reread the chapter. I wish Zakaria had actually given examples of which ones (choices) we should critique in order to champion POC. From inference, perhaps challenging centering sex positive capitalism?

Favourite quotes:

"Documentation of experience is also valuable as an affirmation of humanity, solidarity, and collective experience. Which are important kinds of self care for women or colour and other marginalised women"

"It is not enough for alternative narratives for women of colour simply to exist, they must actually alter the content and course of the movement for gender parity. And before this can happen, white women must reckon with just how much white privilege has influenced feminist movements and continues to influence the agenda of Feminism today"

"Part of the problem is... the universal authoritative voice, usually white make subjectivity masquerading as non racial, non gendered, objectivity, is merely transferred to those who but for gender, share many if the same cultural economic and social characteristics. In other words, white women take on the voices of white men and that is considered progress".

"It is still so tempting for white women to interpret their own assent as a matter of pure mertit and their own quest for parity the most urgent priority."

"It is most often easier to inhabit the systems that we find ourselves in than to dismantle them due to their inequity"

"I cannot hide my anger to spare you guilt or hurt feelings... It trivialises our efforts....Guilt is not a response to anger, it is a response to ones own actions or lack of action"

"The change that we need, that feminism needs, is transformational change. The analysis of how and where to make that change must be intersectional. Considering race and class and gender, and the redress must be redistributive and recognitive." 

"White feminists must accept that true solidarity, where all races if women interact at a level of parity, means accomodating and valuing many different kinds of knowledge and expertise first and foremost the kind that comes from lived experience. Accomplishing equality will require lifting up woken who are not slick with jargon rhetoric and venerating their contributions as much as those who know how to package themselves appealingly". 

"To stand for something inherently means that some will choose not to stand with you. This is essential for the Constitution of a movement. Not a harbinger of its inadequacy."

"Without community, there is no liberation...but community must not mean a shedding of our differences, nor the pathetic pretense that these differences do not exist." - Audre Lorde 


Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous dark funny lighthearted fast-paced

My favourite one of the series so far, I laughed out loud several times. I value this so highly because I was having a particuarly bad depression day and felt miserable physically and mentally and this volume genuinely cheered me up. I always enjoy it when they include the shorts at the end too. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

I was so looking forward to this series; scifi short stories by a Black British author! Unfortunately, I was disappointed with the collection. That's not to say that they're bad, they're just not very good. I found most of the stories shallow, with the occasional good premis but ultimately not fleshed out or intiguing enough to hold my attention. A fair few actually repeated the same concepts, such as
alien breeding programs
in 'Buck' and 'Nommo'. And the others never struck the right balance between world building and plot, so much seemed like it was just being explained to me rather than being immersed in the story. Looking back at these I actually can't remember most of the stories, which indicates the average rating should really be lowered.

Two stories do stand out however, 'Control' is a chilling vignette of racist Britain, and 'Seed' was a fabulously surreal and mildly threatening story. I actually think 'Seed' had potential to have more done with it! I would recommend reading both. 

Individual ratings:

  • Percipi - 2.5 ⭐
  • Cirrostratus - 2.5 ⭐
  • Scarecrow - 2 ⭐
  • Cosmogramma - 2.5 ⭐
  • Buck - 3 ⭐
  • Control - 4.25 ⭐ 
  • You meets you- 2.75 ⭐
  • Seed - 4 ⭐ 
  • Dark Matters - 3.5 ⭐
  • Nocturne - 2 ⭐
  • Nommo - 2.5 ⭐ repeat mating story like buck 
  • The Sankofa Principle 2.5 ⭐
  • Link - 2 ⭐
  • The difference between me and you - 3 ⭐
  • Utoma - 3.25 ⭐



Expand filter menu Content Warnings
mysterious slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Thank god the series is over. I was so god-damned bored. I should have DNF'd this book, but I held out just to say that I had completed the trilogy. I can whole-heartedly say that I do not recommend the sequels. Read Annihilation as a stand alone book and enjoy it for what it is.

Acceptance is written in second person ( Idon't understand or feel the reason why), from five people's point of view; Control, Ghost Bird, The Director, Saul (the lighthouse keeper), and the Biologist. We get some answers, none are satisfying. The tone and pace of the book are boring, no mystery, tension, or dread that I've been seeking since Annihilation.

Final gripe - the audiobook quality was spotty. The voices sometimes sounded far away, as if there were two recordings spliced together. This was offputting since the change happened every few sentences, not at expected intervals such as for an entire chapter.

"But what if you discover that the process of purpose is to render invisible so many other things?"

Others' reviews that I strongly resonate with

txw9394's review:
I enjoy how this series explores insanity in the face of something truly unknowable, but the unknowable here is also apparently unwritable for the author. The descriptions of the central mysteries that surround Area X are so deliberately vague they almost always failed to make me feel anything. Just kind of bummed, because again the premise is fascinating.

ahna's review:
As the conclusion to a trilogy, I expected it to answer the questions around Area X set up by the first two books. While it does answer some, it leaves much wanting, and not in a thought-provoking way. Simply in a disappointing way.

ryanmcweeny's review:
never come close to capturing the brilliance of annihilation. There are some answers but nothing truly satisfying and no new mysteries to excite the imagination.  

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous mysterious reflective
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Incredibly disappointing after the first book. For the first 10% of the audiobook I actually quite liked the change in perspective, I thought it would be interesting to gain insight into the authority and researchers behind area X. But no, what this book is instead is a steady stream of conciousness from the new Director of the Southern Reach (John Rodriguez/Control). We only get small, unsatisfying, tidbits about area X that neither inform or grow the mystery, only frustrate the reader (in a bad way). We get long winded descriptions of the Director's daily habits that do not build suspense, only boredom. He frequently over anaylses and describes things by what they are not, rather than what they are, which is infuriating. We get no substantial insight into the 'authority' of the Southern Reach. Where there is any possibility for an insteresting sub-plot, it is completely forgotten about e.g.,
Whitby's artwork or the plant, mouse, and mobile phone.


At over double the length of 'Annihilation', I frankly don't see why this book is justifiable, or even necessary at all. I guessed the indicators of theings going awry e.g.,
the rotting honey smell, the doppelganger biologist, the voice using hypnotic control
and did not find any of the story's 'revelations' shocking e.g.,
Control's fieldwork fuck up, the old Director returning, or the area X border advancing/breaching.
Overall, this is mostly useless filler story, I will however read the final installment with high hopes of a better ending since the first book was so excellent. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous lighthearted tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

It started off so well! I liked the premise, I liked the characterisations, I liked the class consiousness, I liked that 'the help' had their own narrative too. I liked that it was easy to read but still interesting. I guessed who the killer was about a third of the way in and was actually pretty disappointed that I was right. It makes sense, but it seemed a little lazy to be honest. I loved the first half, but unfortunately the second half just wasn't good. I mean, it was still a bit tense, but it felt dragged out, over explained, and the ending was invevitable unfortunately. I was hoping for more from the book. Enjoyable, but could have been so much better.



Vital subject, poorly written. Did you know that tech companies that claim their sophisticated algorithms do all the work, actually outsource the work to exploited people to do and pay them pennies, if at all? If not, then you need to read this book.   

I am grateful for having read this book since I honestly didn't know that 'Microwork' even existed, let alone what it entailed. The subject matter of microwork and all else it impacts is incredibly important to understanding the state of the world and where we're moving towards. 'Platform capitalism' refers to monolithic companies (platforms) such as Amazon, Google, and Facebook. Microwork refers to the "badly paid, psychically damaging tasks – not algorithms – that are primarily what make our digital lives legible". Exploited workers at companies such as MechanicalTurk, Clickworker, and Appen, make tech possible.

The book covers:
  • what microwork is.
  • how it exploits the 'workers' directly (withholding pay, precarity of work, no employee rights) and indirectly (the tech they assist build oppresses them e.g. drones, facial recognition AI etc.)
  • highlights the exascerbation of existing inequalities e.g., of the global south and displaced people
  • how microwork gives the companies something more valuable than the completed task at hand, e.g., teaching AI how to recognise a cat in a photo, but meta data on how the task was completed. This is valuable data that the companies can use, reuse, and sell on. 
  • implications of microwork changing the traditional workforce, e.g. informal work affects on the relationship of employer vs employee, the wage, and unionising
  • A small, but interesting sight into opportunites of ogranisation and an alterative (better) use for microwork e.g., through universal basic services and freedom of labour (per William Morris, and note; not from labour)

All of these insights are important and interesting. However, the book's organisation into chapters is haphazard at best. Points are consistently repeated, 'wow' moments of realisation are lost, and the flowery language is unecessary. This could be a bug bear just because I'm a scientist and I tend to prefer concise writing, but I strongly dislike how the current leftist literature authors typically write. It is often flowery. I do not think it is engaging to a wider audience and it actively detracts from the power of the points being made. I find this book critically important, but monumentally difficult to read. I encourage you to persevere, or if you can't, read a few of the many credible sources provided and peice it together yourself. 


adventurous funny informative mysterious reflective slow-paced

I read this as an audio book, which Abramović narrates. I loved listening to her slavic accent, however if you struggle to understand English in strong accents, the audio book version may not be for you.

The memoir covers the entirety of her life, from a young child in former Yugoslavia to her most recent life and work in America founding the Marina Abramović Insititute (MIA). The book is long, and felt long, but I didn't mind because I was enjoying the journey and listening to her speak. The last third of the book started to become boring. The narrative is chronological, and Marina talks about her performance works, her romantic relationships (notably Ulay and Paolo Canevari), and her own spiritual journey. She is very interested in mysticism and spirituality, and frequently speaks about its impact on her personal and professional life. She also scatters in many funny slavic fables, jokes, and cultural anecdotes.

As a fan of her work, I found learning about the thought and process behind each piece very interesting. As a person, especially a women, I felt terrible for how the men in her life have treated her. As a working class person with a chip on my shoulder, learning about her origins and her approach to life (e.g., despite communist Yugoslavia, being extremely priviledged with family and education opportunities, plus her seemingly consequence-lite/free life when making her name) envious and very frustrating. I am yet to read a memoir by an artist I admire that has not had enormous priviledge, especially political and social connections. Mostly, Marina acknowledges her priviledge.

Marina is very honest in this memoir and her passion for her work really comes across. Moreover than being informative, she has inspired me to approach my own life in a new way. Her memoir indicates how we could broaden our experiences with the world and intereact with my body and mind in a deeper way. 

Quotes

"Art must be disturbing, art must ask questions, art must predict the future. If art is just political it becomes like a newspaper, it can be used once and then the next day it becomes yesterday's news. Only layers of meaning can give long life to art. that way society takes what it needs from the work over time."

"Pain is something like a secret door to another state of consciousness. When you reach the door then another side opens."

"Testing the willingness or unwillingness of the audience to participate."

"I felt strongly how war and violence bring people to spiritual emptiness"



Expand filter menu Content Warnings