Take a photo of a barcode or cover
1.37k reviews by:
onmalsshelf
lighthearted
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I love Thimble 🥺
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I love when there’s multiple twists.
I can see why this is getting mixed reviews, but I devoured this one.
Atmospheric and might just be perfect to read on Halloween.
I can see why this is getting mixed reviews, but I devoured this one.
Atmospheric and might just be perfect to read on Halloween.
What a bummer because I was so excited for this one.
I kept waiting for the kids and young adult child to not being annoying brats, but of course they got worse.
Nothing really happened besides whining and a missing wallet in the 89 pages I read.
I kept waiting for the kids and young adult child to not being annoying brats, but of course they got worse.
Nothing really happened besides whining and a missing wallet in the 89 pages I read.
I was very much enjoying this, but it just couldn't hold my attention. As someone who looked up to RBG and the work she did with the ACLU and on the Supreme Court, I was so excited to read this one. Sadly, it just didn't work out for me and wasn't quite what I was expecting.
If you admire (and miss) RBG, I suggest at least trying this one!
May her memory be a blessing.
If you admire (and miss) RBG, I suggest at least trying this one!
May her memory be a blessing.
dark
sad
medium-paced
Graphic: Cancer, Eating disorder, Suicide attempt
lighthearted
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Moderate: Death of parent
It’s like a clogged kitchen sink of pretentious writing, robotic dialogue, unlikeable characters, and all of the trigger warnings.
A character driven story with zero plot and zero character development. I agree with others that you will probably like this if you like Sally Rooney’s writing.
Also, the friendship is so toxic - stop glorifying it.
Make sure to check ALL of the triggers before going into this one.
A character driven story with zero plot and zero character development. I agree with others that you will probably like this if you like Sally Rooney’s writing.
Also, the friendship is so toxic - stop glorifying it.
Make sure to check ALL of the triggers before going into this one.
Graphic: Cancer, Medical content, Medical trauma, Car accident, Death of parent, Cultural appropriation, Injury/Injury detail
mysterious
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for an ARC of this.
EDIT 9/6/2022 - Apparently Ashley Flowers had a co-author on this, but has not mentioned that co-author once or given the individual any kind of credit. I will be knocking this down from two stars to one.
ORIGINAL:
This was a fast paced read set in Wakarusa, Indiana, which is a local seldom used so it was so refreshing to get a book, let alone a thriller set here. However, as mentioned above some of the local things mentioned did not make sense, especially if she talked to her co-podcaster about the town. Setting can be everything in a thriller and sadly it didn’t hold up here.
I enjoyed the mix of journalism and small town investigation, but wanted a lot more from the ending and the epilogue. I also needed more of the how and why of some of the things that would suddenly happen (like her finding someone quickly in Chicago and someone getting arrested without drama).
It is also impossible to ignore the nods to the JonBenét Ramsey case here. It was more than ‘inspired by’ the case.
I also find it weird that a woman found to plagiarize her podcast included journalism ethics in her debut.
Just relieved she didn’t mention “full body chills” once.
As someone who lives close to Wakarusa, I feel suspect about some things mentioned here so I’m waiting to hear back from someone with a finished copy to see if some things I’m questioning changed between the eARC and final copy. Therefore, my rating is subject to change as I can’t use quotes from the eARC
Verdict: Do not recommend.
Someone who has plagiarized and also made money off of several Indiana cases without permission from the families does not deserve your money off of this book.
TW: dementia
EDIT 9/6/2022 - Apparently Ashley Flowers had a co-author on this, but has not mentioned that co-author once or given the individual any kind of credit. I will be knocking this down from two stars to one.
ORIGINAL:
This was a fast paced read set in Wakarusa, Indiana, which is a local seldom used so it was so refreshing to get a book, let alone a thriller set here. However, as mentioned above some of the local things mentioned did not make sense, especially if she talked to her co-podcaster about the town. Setting can be everything in a thriller and sadly it didn’t hold up here.
I enjoyed the mix of journalism and small town investigation, but wanted a lot more from the ending and the epilogue. I also needed more of the how and why of some of the things that would suddenly happen (like her finding someone quickly in Chicago and someone getting arrested without drama).
It is also impossible to ignore the nods to the JonBenét Ramsey case here. It was more than ‘inspired by’ the case.
I also find it weird that a woman found to plagiarize her podcast included journalism ethics in her debut.
Just relieved she didn’t mention “full body chills” once.
As someone who lives close to Wakarusa, I feel suspect about some things mentioned here so I’m waiting to hear back from someone with a finished copy to see if some things I’m questioning changed between the eARC and final copy. Therefore, my rating is subject to change as I can’t use quotes from the eARC
Verdict: Do not recommend.
Someone who has plagiarized and also made money off of several Indiana cases without permission from the families does not deserve your money off of this book.
TW: dementia
Graphic: Dementia
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated