Take a photo of a barcode or cover
tetromino's Reviews (233)
You don't need a hallmark movie when you have whatever these books are in 126 pages or less!
I-
What was that?
No sir. I will not be continuing this series.
What was that?
No sir. I will not be continuing this series.
Written so realistically it was physically causing me pain, in particular I really wanted to throw hands at basically every male character, Hanchol and Jungho I will see you in the fucking pit, I'll show you what women are made of if Jade won't 👊💥👊💥👊
My library has the most incredible stuff in its digital collection--LOL
Solid, but it very funny to me that Kye was inexplicably just a wuxia character, like there's no reason for it, just idk his creator wanted to have Wei Wuxian in her house for some reason. The slightly sexual scene was totally out of nowhere (really the whole romance felt a bit random, and I am not saying this bc I'm anti robot-romance, I am incredibly pro dating robots in fiction) but does this mean his creator gave him a robo penis....or maybe just some form of functioning robo-genitalia? Or is giving pleasure simply one of his programs? Why would she do this... Much to think about...
It is 2024 (nearly 2025 at the time of writing this) and we no longer need boring yuri. No other word for it, I was bored
.gif)
Cute, and enjoyable realistic too! As an adult I forget that actually picture books are awesome and the prose in this was intensely enjoyable!
adventurous
medium-paced
Nghi Vo, the author you are!
Loved this one, as all the rest, a fun darker atmosphere than the rest. I really adored Ngung as a primary character and them and Chih's relationship throughout the story. This series always seems to know what I want more than I do, while I still think the first two are the strongest I'm here for anything Singing Hills for as long as they are written!
Loved this one, as all the rest, a fun darker atmosphere than the rest. I really adored Ngung as a primary character and them and Chih's relationship throughout the story. This series always seems to know what I want more than I do, while I still think the first two are the strongest I'm here for anything Singing Hills for as long as they are written!
lighthearted
slow-paced
This is a book where, before anything, I would love to know more about the authors. I can't find squat about Eva Clarke, and evidently Richie Williams is an illustrator, dad, and listens to a lot of Lana Del Ray and Shakey Graves. I'm not really sure why I want to know this information but it feels relevant to my review of it ultimately, because I think I would feel different if this was a student project of something of the ilk.
I'm a 24 year old person, maybe I had no business reading this to begin with, but what can I say! I'm an artist myself, I love picture books, and I'm curious by nature wondering if I too could figure out what book this book is homage to (It's Goodnight Moon btw).
The writing is...fine? It feels less of an homage to Goodnight Moon as much as a bit derivative. What makes Goodnight Moon so good is the illustrations as well as all the specific things having more adjectives and descriptions. For example: the red balloon, bowl full of mush, quiet old lady whispering hush. So this book's sparse words come across as less simplistic but a little bare because the illustrations aren't quite capable of holding up the words.
As an artist, art is freaking hard. It's super hard! I can excuse a lack of skill due to inexperience (I myself went to some life drawing last week and was humbled as always by the difficulty of art) but I do feel like reusing the drawing of a squirrel by flipping it due to it being digital art feels lazy. Like...c'mon man. Kids aren't dumb, they are gonna notice that. Show the squirrel interacting with some of these objects, and for the love of all things, don't just write "corner store" on the corner store--just make up some fake cute name! Call it the Snack Shack, call it the Joe's Quik-Shop, call it the Crunchy Corner, idk!
I feel like I'm going in unnecessarily hard on this book but I am not a believer in being overly generous to children's books because children read them and what kids read really matters. This book doesn't really work for me, not because I'm too old, but because it lacks an understanding of kids as a demographic. Kids care a lot more than people believe and need to be genuinely engaged with or else its just another couple pages they'll forget about within the hour.
Anyways, thank you to authors for the free copy and, uh, I'm very sorry for not having more kind things to say. Though I will say a squirrel in a park without an acorn playing a role? Criminal, please amend this in the sequel!
I'm a 24 year old person, maybe I had no business reading this to begin with, but what can I say! I'm an artist myself, I love picture books, and I'm curious by nature wondering if I too could figure out what book this book is homage to (It's Goodnight Moon btw).
The writing is...fine? It feels less of an homage to Goodnight Moon as much as a bit derivative. What makes Goodnight Moon so good is the illustrations as well as all the specific things having more adjectives and descriptions. For example: the red balloon, bowl full of mush, quiet old lady whispering hush. So this book's sparse words come across as less simplistic but a little bare because the illustrations aren't quite capable of holding up the words.
As an artist, art is freaking hard. It's super hard! I can excuse a lack of skill due to inexperience (I myself went to some life drawing last week and was humbled as always by the difficulty of art) but I do feel like reusing the drawing of a squirrel by flipping it due to it being digital art feels lazy. Like...c'mon man. Kids aren't dumb, they are gonna notice that. Show the squirrel interacting with some of these objects, and for the love of all things, don't just write "corner store" on the corner store--just make up some fake cute name! Call it the Snack Shack, call it the Joe's Quik-Shop, call it the Crunchy Corner, idk!
I feel like I'm going in unnecessarily hard on this book but I am not a believer in being overly generous to children's books because children read them and what kids read really matters. This book doesn't really work for me, not because I'm too old, but because it lacks an understanding of kids as a demographic. Kids care a lot more than people believe and need to be genuinely engaged with or else its just another couple pages they'll forget about within the hour.
Anyways, thank you to authors for the free copy and, uh, I'm very sorry for not having more kind things to say. Though I will say a squirrel in a park without an acorn playing a role? Criminal, please amend this in the sequel!