You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
omqchristi's Reviews (728)
» overview «
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- equally fun as book 1
» disliked «
- equally lacking as book 1
» overall «
ok, next
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- equally fun as book 1
» disliked «
- equally lacking as book 1
» overall «
ok, next
» overview «
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★★☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- fun
» disliked «
- lacking
» overall «
fun, but nothing special
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★★☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- fun
» disliked «
- lacking
» overall «
fun, but nothing special
» overview «
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- love the illustrations
- a lot of fun and creative ideas
» disliked «
- repetitive
» overall «
not bad, just repetitive
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- love the illustrations
- a lot of fun and creative ideas
» disliked «
- repetitive
» overall «
not bad, just repetitive
» overview «
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ☆☆☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- lovely list of words, that's all
- nice illustrations
» disliked «
- no development of ideas
» overall «
no star ratings for plot, characters, and writing, since this is essentially just a dictionary
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ☆☆☆☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ☆☆☆☆☆
writing: ☆☆☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- lovely list of words, that's all
- nice illustrations
» disliked «
- no development of ideas
» overall «
no star ratings for plot, characters, and writing, since this is essentially just a dictionary
For non-book records, review text and ratings are hidden. Only mood, pace, and content warnings are visible.
» overview «
stars: ★★★☆☆
plot: ★★☆☆☆
readability: ★★★★☆
characters: ★★★☆☆
writing: ★★★☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- the concept of AI/androids becoming deviant/gaining sentience
- the romance and how it was developed
» disliked «
- lack of a larger, more impactful plot (especially since the romance was short)
» overall «
better than volume 4 was, since there was more of a connection between Nick and Charlie in this one. maybe i just the like beginning of romances more.
stars: ★★★☆☆
plot: ★★☆☆☆
readability: ★★★★☆
characters: ★★★☆☆
writing: ★★★☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- the concept of AI/androids becoming deviant/gaining sentience
- the romance and how it was developed
» disliked «
- lack of a larger, more impactful plot (especially since the romance was short)
» overall «
better than volume 4 was, since there was more of a connection between Nick and Charlie in this one. maybe i just the like beginning of romances more.
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
» overview «
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ★★★☆☆
readability: ★★☆☆☆
characters: ★★★☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- how mental health was addressed
- how a healthy relationship was portrayed
» disliked «
- after 4 books, i still don't really connect with Nick and Charlie's relationship
- lack of a compelling plot
- weak romance
» overall «
in most books, the romance that occurs in them helps keep me engaged in the story and the characters. this book, despite being primarily a romance, doesn't do that.
stars: ★★☆☆☆
plot: ★★★☆☆
readability: ★★☆☆☆
characters: ★★★☆☆
writing: ★★☆☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- how mental health was addressed
- how a healthy relationship was portrayed
» disliked «
- after 4 books, i still don't really connect with Nick and Charlie's relationship
- lack of a compelling plot
- weak romance
» overall «
in most books, the romance that occurs in them helps keep me engaged in the story and the characters. this book, despite being primarily a romance, doesn't do that.
adventurous
hopeful
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
» overview «
stars: ★★★☆☆
plot: ★★★☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ★★★★☆
writing: ★★★☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- the characters, old and new
- how this book made Iko less annoying (and more likable)
» disliked «
- villain's motives
- the lackluster plot
» overall «
not a bad revisit to the series and the world, but overall not as epic or grand (for obvious reasons)
stars: ★★★☆☆
plot: ★★★☆☆
readability: ★★★☆☆
characters: ★★★★☆
writing: ★★★☆☆
recommend: ✗
» liked «
- the characters, old and new
- how this book made Iko less annoying (and more likable)
» disliked «
- villain's motives
- the lackluster plot
» overall «
not a bad revisit to the series and the world, but overall not as epic or grand (for obvious reasons)
» QUICK OVERVIEW «
Stars: ★★☆☆☆
Plot: ★★☆☆☆
Readability: ★★★★☆
Characters: ★★☆☆☆
Writing: ★★☆☆☆
Recommend: ✗
» PLOT «
Pongo and Missis had a lovely life. With their human owners, the Dearlys, to look after them, they lived in a comfortable home in London with their 15 adorable Dalmatian puppies, loved and admired by all. Especially the Dearlys' neighbor Cruella de Vil, a fur-fancying fashion plate with designs on the Dalmatians' spotted coats! So, when the puppies are stolen from the Dearly home, and even Scotland Yard is unable to find them, Pongo and Missis know they must take matters into their own paws! The delightful children's classic adapted twice for popular Disney productions.
meh
» READABILITY «
very readable
» CHARACTERS «
meh
» WRITING «
it was okay
» OVERALL «
not one i really read as a child
Stars: ★★☆☆☆
Plot: ★★☆☆☆
Readability: ★★★★☆
Characters: ★★☆☆☆
Writing: ★★☆☆☆
Recommend: ✗
» PLOT «
Pongo and Missis had a lovely life. With their human owners, the Dearlys, to look after them, they lived in a comfortable home in London with their 15 adorable Dalmatian puppies, loved and admired by all. Especially the Dearlys' neighbor Cruella de Vil, a fur-fancying fashion plate with designs on the Dalmatians' spotted coats! So, when the puppies are stolen from the Dearly home, and even Scotland Yard is unable to find them, Pongo and Missis know they must take matters into their own paws! The delightful children's classic adapted twice for popular Disney productions.
meh
» READABILITY «
very readable
» CHARACTERS «
meh
» WRITING «
it was okay
» OVERALL «
not one i really read as a child
» QUICK OVERVIEW «
Stars: ★★☆☆☆
Plot: ★★☆☆☆
Readability: ★★☆☆☆
Characters: ★★☆☆☆
Writing: ★★☆☆☆
Recommend: ✗
» PLOT «
When Chris joins the staff at her local record store, she’s surprised to find out that her co-workers share a secret: they’re all members of a secret fight club that take on the patriarchy and fight crime!
the art style was very beautiful, but the plot was lackluster. it was underdeveloped and just needed more details.
» READABILITY «
fast read
» CHARACTERS «
the characters honestly all just blended together, and the fact that they all pretty much got along made their relationships boring.
» WRITING «
the writing was alright, there just needed to be more. I, however, did like the inner dialogue though.
» OVERALL «
had potential, just needs more
Stars: ★★☆☆☆
Plot: ★★☆☆☆
Readability: ★★☆☆☆
Characters: ★★☆☆☆
Writing: ★★☆☆☆
Recommend: ✗
» PLOT «
When Chris joins the staff at her local record store, she’s surprised to find out that her co-workers share a secret: they’re all members of a secret fight club that take on the patriarchy and fight crime!
the art style was very beautiful, but the plot was lackluster. it was underdeveloped and just needed more details.
» READABILITY «
fast read
» CHARACTERS «
the characters honestly all just blended together, and the fact that they all pretty much got along made their relationships boring.
» WRITING «
the writing was alright, there just needed to be more. I, however, did like the inner dialogue though.
» OVERALL «
had potential, just needs more