This was supposed to be a scary story, but it just didn’t do anything for me. I really thought it was just boring and drawn out, without much conflict or drive. It’s one of those classics I’d rather see on the screen instead of on paper.

I didn’t enjoy the dialect this book was written in, and felt like it didn’t serve a real purpose besides making the book feel like it’s ~unique~. Also, the main character was just very boring and unsympathetic for me. Overall an uninteresting read.

This isn't my favorite Tennessee Williams play, but it was the first one I read. It's a fantastic read; emotional and human. It's one of William's foundational plays for good reason.

One of my favorite plays, I really think The Crucible is an interesting and enjoyable read and watch. The extended metaphor for McCarthyism is very obvious, almost laughably so. Despite that, I've read this several times, and enjoyed it more each time. Also, nothing is funnier to me than "I saw Goody Proctor dancing with The Devil!"

I really like the addition of Misa as a character. I think she adds another dimension to the story, and while she’s a bit maddening, she’s also fairly clever.

This was a reread, since I hadn’t read Eragon since middle school. Unfortunately, it didn’t hold its charm. I really disliked all the description, and the hyper focus on how perfect elves and Aria are. Just overwritten tbh.

This story was okay, but I felt like it didn’t bring anything new to the story. After I finished reading it I kinda forgot what it was about. Just not memorable.

This was much less charming than I was hoping for. I really never got attached to any of the characters, and had no interest in the storyline because of it. I guess I’m kinda over high school romances tbh.

I mostly like Hamlet for the side characters. I dislike Hamlet himself quite a bit. Definitely one of my least favorites of the tragedies.

This book was more cute than anything. I can fully understand why it’s considered a children’s book now.