Didn’t like this one much. The story is slow and too long for this type of children book. The art didn’t please me neither. Jus not my style, I guess.

4,5/5. I was so happy an felt a bit numb at the time to see that Lisa Genova had written a non-fiction/science book. I had not idea she had such a neurologist/scientist background, I guess that explain the quality of the «science» behind Still Alice, which is an awesome book and a awesome movie adaptation as well.

I was please with this one. Very easy to get into. Lisa Genova explain everything very well, with good example and cover most aspect surrounding memory. I thought it might have gone deeper, I felt it left a bit too much on the surface, but it might be a bit because she is so good at explaining stuff, that it felt simple, while being sort of complex. Anyway, I enjoy it and I learn stuff which was the objective so... well done!!

Stupid humor and art that is nowhere near the dark and beautiful cover art... Very disappointing in every possible way!

2,5/5. Extrêmement déçu par ce roman. Le talent d’écriture de Roxanne Bouchard ne fait aucun doute. Elle rend parfaitement justice aux paysages de la Gaspésie et démontre une recherche minutieuse sur le métier de pêcheur. Par contre, j’ai trouvé qu’elle avait la main forte sur les métaphores par moment. Les dialogues m’ont également paru répétitif et assez peu réaliste. Enfin, où le bas blesse, c’est au niveau de la trame narrative. Un rythme terriblement lent, qui donne un roman plus près de la littérature générale que d’un roman policier. Pendant une longue partie du livre, l’enquête est quasi secondaire, les paysages, la vie personnelle de Joaquin prennent le dessus. Je ne suis pas contre cela, mais attaquant ce roman avec la présomption qu’il s’agissait d’un roman policier… j’ai été déçu.

Je suis donc envers et contre tous ici, mais j’ai trouvé qu’il s’agissait en fin de compte d’un roman correcte, mais d’un mauvais policier. J’ai aimé l’atmosphère et les lieux, mais la trame narrative et les personnages m’ont laissé de glace. Je m’attendais à beaucoup plus.

Funny and light hearted little web comic book. Not my favorite of those, but still a very enjoyable one!

I was expecting something so much more different! I wanted to read this comic for years, having heard so much about and finding the premise so promising. And yet it delivers a comic that felt in the same old pattern, with a surprisingly absence of depth and overall just another Superman and not the totally different Superman I was hoping and expecting. lot less darker than I also thought it would be. I couldn't have been less disappointed than I was. Not entirely bad, but way too casual to be put in such high praise!

The art is great and does remind of TWD with colors, but not the kind of story I was hoping for. Slow, not enough vampire and even if there is a bunch of action, again not the kind I wanted. Not for me!

That was fantastic!! I don't know why I never read this one before! I knew the name, I knew about it, just never had my hands on... Now I'm glad I finally did. The art was awesome and such a great story with an impressive cast of super-heroes! This is my kind of comic!

Original work for sure, but in the style, the concept and the illustrations. A beautiful artistic work but unfortunately something that didn't connect with me at all. I understand the way, I see the potential but it wasn't for me. Personal appreciation 2/5, potential 4/5. I'll have to go with a fair 3/5.

Another Joe Pickett in the box. I love Joe as a protagonist. He is a righteous man, family man, not major flaws without being too white knight. The environmental issues that are always part of the story are also a big pus for me. I might take a break of those for a while because even if they are entertaining, they are a bit similar from one another and having read three of them in the last three months or so… it might be a bit too much. I will continue this series, maybe two or three books a year.