was this easy to read? no. i think while the plot itself is easy to follow, the writing and the message were complex and at times purposefully obfuscated.

but to me the book was intentionally written. 

i wish i knew the right person to recommend this to irl. someone who both understands fandom and would enjoy this type of novel. because there are a lot of interesting discussions to be had based of some of the questions and ethical dilemmas this book poses. i will definitely try to get my hands on a physical copy for a future reread.

also i feel like it's a good litmus test whether you first read y/n as [your name] or [yes or no]. happy to say that i originally read it as the latter(just like moon)

I don't get what point this is trying to make(like genuinely. would love somebody who could explain it to me)... but thanks for raising awareness about chess addiction!

it passed my time during commutes, but the ending pissed me off. also, the modern timeline was far less interesting than the arthur conan doyle one.

My favorite Casey McQuiston book so far. (Maybe the lack of sex?) I must say they've really improved since rw&rb in my eyes.

This was fun! I didn't expect the academic rivals aspect and I think it's done well.

Also, whenever I read McQuiston books I am reminded of my one friend, because as much as I feel like I can relate to the characters, I think these books are the closest I'll get to being inside their brain ashjsdhf Anyway, shoutout to E! I'm glad there's an author that gets you!