Take a photo of a barcode or cover
watermelleon's Reviews (254)
Good bits:
- An excellent deconstruction of key systemic issues within the publishing industry!
- A very bold choice was made to use an unreliable and unlikeable narrator. I absolutely hated the protagonist and it was used sucessfully as a vehicle for suspense and the thriller elements of the book. Seen other opinions on this, but it worked for me!
- A great summary of the alt right pipeline, how it works, and examples of the tiny grains (and buckets) of enabling sand that eventually pool into a beach of ideology.
- Easily the scariest book i have read in a while for mirroring reality so well - the protagonist reminded me of multiple key figures that opperate in a similar way in the news currently.
The questionable bits:
- The book began to feel a bit long and samey in parts, and I wonder if in the full version there may be some reading fatigue as a result?
- While some excellent ideas are discussed, im not fully convinced that yellowface gives the reader enough to learn and change their own perspectives. I worry that only those with understanding of the key issues will get everything going on in a "yes, this reflects real life as i understand it" way, over a "now i understand issues such as cultural appropriation and how i am a part of the problem a bit easier" way. While books dont always need to be an education, i fear that those who need it most will miss the important nuances without this context, or fail to finish it completely.
- Not sure where im sat on
the character of candice and where she ends up. What started as a promising character possibly falls a bit flat in the name of vengeance. This is okay in some instances, but i personally initally read candice as a non-white character which created a bitter taste in it falling the way it did. - Sometimes i felt the author's opinion voice teetering the line of being too strong, putting it in danger of becoming a brash ideology piece(thinking about pullman as a good example of this). Which is a shame, because the points are overall good, but fell on the page too strongly at times which ,ay be offputting to some.
Graphic: Death, Emotional abuse, Hate crime, Misogyny, Racism, Toxic relationship, Medical content, Grief, Cultural appropriation, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol
the good bits:
- the writing style is completely unique. I have read nothing like this ever, and it has been a fully original experience.
- The characters were incredibly complex, despite not knowing their names or what they look like past a quirky defining feature used to establish who is in the room or speaking.
- In a book where almost no-one can see, this book has some of the most vivid and detailed descriptions I have ever read. I could map out a floor plan of a whole building, which absolutely added to the impact of what was happening within the novel.
- so many well thought out moments and quotes, the messaging behind this book was incredible. it feels like a very good time to be reading a book like this, as many instances early on felt very reminiscent of the current situation in Palestine (and other political situations), something saramago has spoken out about for many years.
- I really enjoyed reading this on holiday in portugal! although purposefully not set in a specific country or town, I felt very connected to the work this way - I also caught a glimpse at the saramago foundation community space in obidos :)
the challenges;
- the book is incredibly dark, and a difficult read. by far this book has some of the most uncomfortable scenes I have ever come across, with a lot of potentially triggering detail. However, it doesn't feel gratuitous, or there for the sake of it being there. It has a purpose, and I think any other author (my mind gravitates to stephen king) would have done a terrible job. What was unique for me was that saramago managed to centre these events through the eyes of the victims and not the perpetrators, something I have very rarely (if ever) seen in any other book.
- The writing style I imagine is not for everyone. It does take some getting used to, and I think this plus the traumatic contents do slow down the reading experience. I would not change this though!
- I wish I could have read this in portuguese. I think the translator did an excellent job, however it does (as it always will) feel like it is likely that the original flowery prose is lost to me!
- having known people on a personal basis that have lost their vision overnight, it was a concern to me going in how this concept would come across, and whether it would be too abelist for my tastes. I felt personally that this was avoided, however cannot speak on this opinion from the perspective of a visually impaired person. What made this book feel okay to myself personally was that: it was made very clear that it was a "medically impossible" blindness and not a known medical condition, as well as the one character that could see showing her own type of blindness, assuming that her blind friends needed her help when they were sufficient. what is referred to as "blindness" in this novel is perhaps more a state of mind, over level of vision.
I went into this book wondering if it would be a bit too close to the bone to those who in some way have lost their vision, but have left wondering perhaps the opposite. with something this descriptive and visual I feel like it could be an absolutely incredible audiobook journey!
I would recommend this book on everyone's bucket list, providing the topics covered aren't too difficult for you!
Graphic: Body shaming, Confinement, Genocide, Gore, Infidelity, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Toxic relationship, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Blood, Excrement, Police brutality, Mass/school shootings, Medical trauma, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, Injury/Injury detail, Pandemic/Epidemic
Minor: Car accident
I think your experience of this book will greatly vary on either your experience with other David Mitchell books, or interest in the historical topics covered. I absolutely love how different this was to other Mitchell books, but the topic was not one I'd usually reach for which at times made it very difficult to follow!
The nest of different stories within was so interesting and kept the story flowing nicely if one part wasn't as interesting to me.
Overall, an incredible journey where I learned so much about Dutch-Japanese trading and the history of such a specific time!
Mitchell's books are a giant cobweb of a world, with one in particular (struggling to spoiler tag on my phone!) having a strong link to this one. This has lead me to wonder if I would have enjoyed this more or less if I had read that specific book after this one! I think for me personally, it was great to see where the story ended and then go back to its beginning (similar to how I felt reading the bone clocks and then utopia avenue) - filling in the additional context I knew made some parts, characters, far more interesting (and some parts incredibly darker). But, I can't imagine what it would have been like to read this book when it came out and learn further context years down the line!
The Thing I was not expecting was the grey morality of Jacobs character - I was rather expecting him to be quite the hero, but this is at its heart a story about capitalism. Mitchell does not shy away from this and he does not expect you to fully respect his actions. The gritty side of this time and place are not fantasised, and there are no illusions - Marinus being strategically placed as a representative of a more ethical way of living was a very intelligent choice, and one that the book hugely benefitted from.
It feels acessible, and doesn't go too deep into some topics. But a good starting point!
I'm not fully convinced everything is perfect and I'm not 100% sold on all of the authors views (some about sex work as an honorable mention 😬)
Passes the trans inclusivity test ✨✨
Think that mental image of falling will stay with me for some time.
Some parts were beautifully written, and I have some lovely highlights I will definitely be coming back to! Overall a really good novella that got me gripped, and gave me much to think about. It has also put the library of babel on my reading list!
Graphic: Body horror, Confinement, Death, Gore, Torture, Grief, Injury/Injury detail
Absolutely wonderful!! Karin has a wonderful, easy style of writing that made this book effortless to read. I am so thankful for her openness and honestly in sharing her story as I have seen the impact of this first hand!
I can only review this through the eyes of someone else: I did not know about this author or book before this was recommended (then subsequently loaned to me) by a wonderful work colleague. He brought this to our bookclub rather nervously, and explained how he had previously heard Karin talk on a podcast and felt immediately drawn to this book, despite very rarely reading anything! One flight to the USA later, and he had finished the whole thing.
He explained how Karins open and raw writing taught him things he never knew about topics that are never talked about such as miscarriage and giving birth, and that this book changed his life and general sense of understanding with women. I can absolutely see this book being a key educational tool for many young boys and men, and I wish it was more well known!!
This book is written in a very real way, that still presents as a good education on vaginal health and experiences without being overly crude.
Disclaimer: did my best to do a terf check before reading this and nothing came up for the author on Google or in the book when I looked.
Graphic: Body shaming, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual content, Medical content, Medical trauma, Abortion, Pregnancy, Alcohol
I'll add more later if I can be bothered 😭 never seen a book start at 5 stars and fall so hard on its face so fast. 😭😭😭 I can only laugh about whatever this book was at this point 😭😭😭
I decided to stop reading around halfway through, I have had this on my list for a while and was quite aware it is very academic in nature, which can often run a little dry.
I initially found the first part of the book to be quite interesting, as many things were touched upon including the pansy period which I myself had been researching recently. However the first issue I ran into was that people were beginning to be dead named. (x name, born as Y name). Pronouns also got messy when describing their stories.
This is an excellent academic record of queer history, and something that definitely should exist to prevent further loss of queer history, but I think there is probably a question here of "do we need to mention someone's birth name, in order to make sure we can continue to locate them in historical records?"
the beauty of queer history (to me at least) is the verbal stories passed between us, some outrageous tales that become Chinese whispers. Surely it's better to refer someone by the names they chose, and the stories they chose to tell?
On this note, there was a lot of myth busting, and lines like "many people thought x, but this wasn't true". Who has the right to expel queer myths? I feel a focus on the many stories, over the "actual facts" read into a far more interesting look at queer history (and feel way less mansplainy when listened to over audiobook)
After the initial excitement around this book, and pushing back these issues discussed, I began to feel the book itself was not well structured and at times felt very scattered, which was when I decided to dnf. Very sad, but I think the author did not have a relevant enough background to discuss all kinds of people and topics in a way that worked, and this would have worked better as a collaborative effort with other researchers from these backgrounds.
Graphic: Deadnaming, Hate crime, Homophobia, Transphobia