Take a photo of a barcode or cover
199 reviews by:
samdalefox
challenging
reflective
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
N/A
Strong character development:
N/A
Loveable characters:
N/A
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
N/A
As always, poetry collections will be hit and miss so the star rating tends to be middling. In this collection Carole Ann Duffy writes a range of poems exploring the feminine experience of girls and women. Although certain topics are commendably explored such as rebellion, rage, sexulisation/commodification/made a muse, menstruation, eating disorders, and same sex desire and love, I still found the narrative too binary for my liking in its description of sex and gender, and old fashioned in its definition of feminine. As such most were 'meh' for me, with a few stand outs, listed below.
Favourites:
Favourites:
- The map woman - surrealist and beautiful commentary upon home, belonging, and self development.
- Work - a clear and heartbreaking depiction of the physical and mental labour women do to keep society running, it can also be read as the increasing and thoughtless burden of humanity upon mother nature.
- Loud - carried a really important message on how women have to shout to be heard and the pure rage we have at the systemic violence inflicted upon us disproportionately. (Especially through global war, note the Afghanistan 2001 sentence at the start and the descriptions of violence towards the end).
- Gambler - I personally identified, because I do this too!
"The structure of the collection is very clever, starting with the typically 'Angry, Hurt Feminist' poems which we all associate with Duffy, and ending with much more sentimental, personal and arguably unsettling poems. Individually, the poems are nice and present a clear political and personal message, if a little simple. It's a very nice and easy poetry book to read with some clear and important messages throughout."
hopeful
informative
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced
I listened to this as an Audiobook, I would recommend reading in this format as the author has a very calming voice to listen to. People who are well read in this field, there is overlap with other books out there, however I still learnt a lot and would recommend. For people who are new to this area and would like to read more, I've listed my suggestions below. All of these overlap with 'Wilding' in some way, so if you find this book interesting you are likely to enjoy these others too. I recommend to anyone interested in conservation, rewilding, climate change, and British nature.
The conservationist Aldo Leopold once wrote that 'one of the penalties of an ecological education is that one lives alone in a world of wounds. Much of the damage inflicted on land is quite invisible to laymen. ' But if everyone has an ecological education, we will not live alone, and it will not be a world of wounds.”
Complimentary reading suggestions:
- Regenesis - George Monbiot (2022)
- The Red Deal: Indigenous action to save our earth - The Red Nation (2021)
- Life on our planet - David Attenborough (2020)
- The hidden life of trees - Peter Wohlleben (2015)
- Entangled life - Merlin Sheldrake (2020)
- The garden jungle - Dave Goulson (2019)
Overall, I enjoyed learning about the Knepp project. It appealed to me as a scientist, an enviornmental activist, and a normal person interested in my country's land (England, UK). Despite the narration being soothing to listen to, I found the long lists, statistics, and especially the romantic descriptions of feudal England boring to listen to. I ended up doing other tasks while listening and only stopping to really concentrate or take notes when something new or of particular interest came up.
The major pros of 'Wilding' are the breadth (and sufficient depth) of conservation science, politics, farming, and cultural resistance. Tree has organised the chapters and progression of the book cleverly imo; the structure makes sense the further along you read. The first couple of chapters focussing on her family's estate's history nearly made me DNF, but I'm glad I persisted. Tree uses anecdotes from the chronology of the Knepp rewilding project to focus on specific scientific and political subjects along the way. There is simply too much covered for my to give a comprehensive summary, but I'll list a taster of subjects covered here: biodiveristy, rewilding (minimal intervention), shifting baseline, the history/politics of intensive agriculture, farm subsidies, soil science, emergent properties. My absolute favourite chapter handsdown was the one about Ragwort. It was fascinating and makes me proud to cultivate the ragwort in my garden for the moths.
The cons are few; I can only think of two, and of those two only one really bugged me. The first is the slow and sometimes overly descriptive writing. The second is that I found Tree frustrating. She stated so many excellent facts and explained the relationship between complex biological, cultural, and politcal spheres that impact the enviornment, she came so tantilising close to joining these dots together, but ultimately didn't. To me, this is a critical failure. I forgave David Attenborough in 'A life on our planet' for doing it because he actually joined the dots together and acurrately described the problem and the solution, but just didn't say the name directly of the villain *spoiler alert* capitalism - I believe in an attempt to be broadly read and accepted. But I can't and won't forgive Tree, because it is obvious in the text that she knows what the villain is, and hasn't fully accepted it. This is evidenced in the final chapters.
In short, she accurately describes the horrific affects of capitalism on the climate crisis and in particular land use, agriculture industry, and loss of biodiversity in Britain, but her solution is still capitalism. She directly acknowledges this e.g., "We should certainly question a basic payment scheme which rewards people for doing nothing other than owning land". And, "Rewarding ecosystems for purely human benefit could harm biodiversity in the long term.". She also knows that land ownership is bound up with Britian's class problem, made blindingly obvious by her many references to her husand's noble bloodline and inheritance, and more practically in various pieces of legislation such as the The Allotment Act 1950 and the perverse incentives given to farmers through farm subsidies, financial penalties, and how land is 'valued'. e.g., "Not all rewilded land will produce charasmatic headline species that tourists will flock to see, and it is in the nature of rewilding habitats to shift, for species to move. Incentivising farmers and land owners to give land over to nature has to rely in ways that value that transition and acknowledge the public services that dynamic self willed natural processes provide. This involves changing the way we measure things like productivity, prosperity, sustainability, profit and loss, the business models that evolved at a time when nature's bounty seemed limitless. Payments for ecosystems services, natural capital accounting, pro biodiversity business, and biodiversity offsetting, are all now being explored as ways that the value of nature can be measured in tangible financial terms. Providing cost benefit analyses for the protection of such natural assests as soil, water, air, bees, vegetation, biodiversity, and uplifting views." Tree briefly acknowledges the controversy, amorality and and logistical impossibility of rewilding through capitalism. But ultimately she argues for it, her rationale being that one needs to be visible to the economic system in order to be accommodated for. e.g., when the thing (in this case rewilding, or nature) is not included it is tossed aside. I disagree, under capitalism nature is not merely tossed asside as an after thought it is actively and conciously exploited. All she is suggesting is changing the mode of exploitation. The clincher for me that Tree is not really wedded to actual change (besides her obvious love of the class system) was this quote: "Had intensive farming been profitable for us we would undoubtedly be doing it still". My closing comment is thus: in order to achieve the necessary and desired changes to Britain's land for rewilding and vastly reduced farming, we need LAND REFORM NOW.
Quotes
"We've become trapped by our own observations, we forget that in a world completely transformed by man that what we're looking at is not necessarily the environment wildlife prefer, but the depleted remnants that wildlife is having to cope with. What is has it not necessarily what it wants. Species may be surviving at the very limits of their range, clinging on in conditions that don't really suit them. Open up the box, allow natural processes to develop, give species a wider scope to express themselves and you get a very different picture."
"We have become a nation obsessed with ordliness and boundaries."
"[NIMBYs], dislike mess, say they love nature but don't feel it should look like that. "It feels like a foreign land, it looks abandoned".
"Though we protest that we love nature, is seems that this is only on our own terms. We have become a nation of gardeners, more interested in exotic flowers than natives."
"Once again predjuice and alarm outpace science."
"Lack of unfamiliarity breeds unbridled fears"
"Lack of empathy and knowledge of nature seems to be at the route of much of this behaviour"
"How many trees flowers birds and insects can an average person identify today?"
The Ragwort (1832)
Ragwort, thou humble flower with tattered leaves
I love to see thee come & litter gold,
What time the summer binds her russet sheaves;
Decking rude spots in beauties manifold,
That without thee were dreary to behold,
Sunburnt and bare-- the meadow bank, the baulk
That leads a wagon-way through mellow fields,
Rich with the tints that harvest's plenty yields,
Browns of all hues; and everywhere I walk
Thy waste of shining blossoms richly shields
The sun tanned sward in splendid hues that burn
So bright & glaring that the very light
Of the rich sunshine doth to paleness turn
& seems but very shadows in thy sight.
I love to see thee come & litter gold,
What time the summer binds her russet sheaves;
Decking rude spots in beauties manifold,
That without thee were dreary to behold,
Sunburnt and bare-- the meadow bank, the baulk
That leads a wagon-way through mellow fields,
Rich with the tints that harvest's plenty yields,
Browns of all hues; and everywhere I walk
Thy waste of shining blossoms richly shields
The sun tanned sward in splendid hues that burn
So bright & glaring that the very light
Of the rich sunshine doth to paleness turn
& seems but very shadows in thy sight.
John Clare (1793-1864)
adventurous
challenging
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
The fourth book in the Warriors series. I'm rating this one on par with the third installment but for different reasons. Where the third one ties up some loose plot ends and developed characters in an interesting way, Rising Storm (the first part of the second half of the series) clearly throwing challenges and conflict at the clan members to overcome in the next two books and ends on an obvious, but massive, cliffhanger. There is A LOT going on, but I think younger readers would find that as exciting as I did, not confusing. However, as mentioned the introduction of challenges means that the themes tend towards the more emotionally difficult: conflict, isolation, mental illness shown through Bluestar , becoming homeless shown through the forest fire , kidnapping shown through Cloudpaw , betrayal, outcasting shown through the casting out of the sick shadow clan cats who asked help , lack of confidence, and death. I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT MY YELLOWFANG HAS DIED. I WAS HEART BROKEN. Both she and Cinderpaw remain my favourites. Graystripe is still up there too.
Minor: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Bullying, Mental illness, Violence, Blood, Grief, Fire/Fire injury
adventurous
reflective
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Strong start, weak ending, not up to the standards I expect from Philip K. Dick. The narrative is easy to read and fast paced. The themes are actually really interesting, but Dick doesn't develop them at all! The ending is rushed and cheesy in that it is unsubtle and inauthentic. The whole Adam and Eve thing repopulating the species is so incredibly dull, cliche, conveniently quick, Western-colonial-focused, and HAS BEEN DONE BEFORE MUCH BETTER BY OTHER SUPERB AUTHORS, notably Jame Tiptree Jr (Alice Bradley Sheldon) . It would have been much more interesting if Dick had pursued the themes introduced (e.g., nature of man as violent/tendancy towards war, is this innate or a learnt habit?, and the nature of human conciousness, thinking and being) rather than present an 'elegant solution' via the ending.
Minor: Terminal illness, War
hopeful
informative
inspiring
medium-paced
If you can wade through the waffle and uneccesarily complex language, this is a wonderfully convincing essay with well evidenced claims. I currently feel politically homeless (UK based) as none of the political parties or dominant social attitudes represent my political views. The theory of the comrade presented in this book is the sort of political belonging I have been searching for, and I would like to put this theory into action. This theory in a nutshell is: "Comrade is a figure of political belonging, term of address, and carrier of expectations of action."
I would certainly recommend to anyone on the left, I suspect anarchists and communists will more likely embrace the idea presented. I don't think this is a good book for politically-passive people interested in learning about or joining the left, the language is too inaccessible. The subject matter is critical though, so I'd like to see the author create a summary article or infographics set to share.
Pros
I would certainly recommend to anyone on the left, I suspect anarchists and communists will more likely embrace the idea presented. I don't think this is a good book for politically-passive people interested in learning about or joining the left, the language is too inaccessible. The subject matter is critical though, so I'd like to see the author create a summary article or infographics set to share.
Pros
- I love the content of the essay. I'll summarise some standout aspects here:
- Dean describes the variance in political work, this is inspiring
- Dean argues for 'The Party', to create a sense of belonging and accountability to each other. This challenges ideas of hierarchy and dominance perpetuated by capitlaism.
- Dean has an interesting critique of Allyship, I enjoyed most of it, only disagreed with a couple of points
- Dean focuses on communicative capitalism (the author's own coining)
- Interesting illustation and commentary of 'the comrade' using 'Prochies' from Platanov's Chevengur.
- I greatly enjoyed the commentary on discipline and organisation
- Dean gave good insights into the factionalism and apathy within the left (pages 100-101 were poignant)
- Dean highlights the importance of unifying theory and practice
- I loved the natural queer theory inclusion of 'the comrade'. The term is distinct from citizen (state relationship) or familial terms (blood and inheritance relationships). Comradery can provide intimacy in a different way.
- I particularly enjoyed the chapter on comrades' four primary characteristics: discipline, joy, enthusiasm, and courage.
- A difficult, but ultimately incredibly important, explanation of why comrade can and must be based on sameness and equality (not on equity, as focussed on in most intersectional feminist politics). This was difficult for me to understand at first, but ultimately I was convinced by the argument. The historical examples given from the CPUSA on their approach to anti-racism was what swung it for me. I would gladly join a party with such a clear and strong stance on anti-racist action in practice.
Cons
- Inacessible language and analyses to anyone not well-read in leftist literature. Even a glossary of terms would greatly help widen this up to people. e.g., most people don't understand the difference between democratic socialist and communist and most aren't well read in the Russian revolution factions beyond the Bolsheviks.
- Even for those well read, the style is unecessarily academic in my opinion. I was finding myself getting bored and having to re-read a sentence or paragraph a few times. For a short book, it felt long. Usually, the same information was summarised more clearly only a page or so afterwards. It could have benefitted from a more rutherless editor.
- Attempts to be global, but is largely US-centric. This is acknowledged by the author, and not necessarily a probem. I would just like to see wider inclusion. There are many examples of 'the comrade' in the global south, and I don't see global north authors discussing them. This is disappointing and missing an opportunity to build global solidarity.
How to say comrade in other languages:
German - Genosse
Russian - Tovarish
Chinese - Tongzhi
Spanish - Camerata
Quotes
"Ally appears to designate a limit, suggesting that you will never be one of us, than it does to enable solidarity". (Solidarity that is required for a revolutionary left to succeed) - parantheses my own
"We need to learn, or relearn, how to build comradeship and solidarity instead of doing capital's work for it by condemning and abusing each other" - Mark Fisher
"Comrade does not eliminate difference. It provides a container indifferent to its contents".
"Comrades put individual identity aside as they work together for justice. Collective desire replaces the fiction that desire can be individual... this doesn't mean that comrades don't recognize how ascribed identities are vehicles for oppesions and discrimination... rather comradeship is a politcal relation not determined or beholden to these identities."
"Comrade entails taking a side, rather than refusing to acknowledge and avow the existence of sides".
"[The term] Comrades let one forget the status that the world gives them - birth, family, name, class."
"Comradeship is a necessary condition for communism: the collective of those who enjoy each other refuse to let property take their place."
"Comrade designates a relation, not an individual identity".
"Comrades are not simply those who believe in a truth - for example as in, for example the idea of communism. Their fidelity to a certain truth is manifested in practical work"
"Anyone can be a comrade, but not everyone. And, there is a space of non-belonging. That you are not my comrade does not mean that you are necessarily my enemy. You may be a bystander, comeone politically disengaged, an ally with interests of your own that temporarily overlap with mine, someone who might later come to be a comrade."
"Comrades are multiple, replaceable, fungible. They are elements in collectives, even collections."
"The working class demonstrates through proletarian discipline, that capitalists and landlords are superfluous. We don't need them."
"Revolutionary discipline depends on political conciousness - on an understanding of why order must be obeyed" - George Orwell
"Comradely courage includes the capacity for self criticism, the capacity to admit to being wrong or not knowing and then correct any errors through further study and work."
challenging
sad
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Not for me. Even when I read the reviews and analyses of others I think they're reaching for a depth of meaning that just isn't present in this short story. I don't know what else to say, I've copied a review from another Storygraph member below which I agree with.
coolchick_cesc's review:
This short story (originally published in the 50s) follows a family roadtripping through the Bible Belt while a serial killer runs loose. I’m sure you can guess the rest. There are themes of Southern religion, salvation, and race, as the grandmother begs God to forgive this white serial killer while literally in a plantation. Like many short stories, I think the pacing was a bit off and suspense struggled to build. While the characterisation was good for such a short book, the story is incredibly dated and not very remarkable with a 2022 lens.
coolchick_cesc's review:
This short story (originally published in the 50s) follows a family roadtripping through the Bible Belt while a serial killer runs loose. I’m sure you can guess the rest. There are themes of Southern religion, salvation, and race, as the grandmother begs God to forgive this white serial killer while literally in a plantation. Like many short stories, I think the pacing was a bit off and suspense struggled to build. While the characterisation was good for such a short book, the story is incredibly dated and not very remarkable with a 2022 lens.
Moderate: Racial slurs
Minor: Racism, Classism
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I picked this book up from my local library to read over Halloween. I can't believe I didn't know of Matheson before, I recognised many of his stories (mainly from The Simpsons Halloween specials) and can clearly see the influence he's had on the next generation of writers... I'm looking at you Stephen King, verging on plagerism.
As such I found this collection difficult to rate. The stories themselves are straightforward, unpretentious and sophisticated/novel for the time they were written in. Matheson clearly was a trailblazer in changing the genre of horror short stories from settings of the fantastical to the mundane. However, precisely because of his wide-reaching influence, many of these stories seemed familar, old, or boring to me. I've rated the book based on an average, see below for individual story ratings and calculation. I'd recommend reading any of the stories I've rated as 3.5 or higher. My personal favourites were 'Button, button', 'Duel', and 'Deus ex machina'.
I found a review that categorised the collection into three themes, which I agree with:
As such I found this collection difficult to rate. The stories themselves are straightforward, unpretentious and sophisticated/novel for the time they were written in. Matheson clearly was a trailblazer in changing the genre of horror short stories from settings of the fantastical to the mundane. However, precisely because of his wide-reaching influence, many of these stories seemed familar, old, or boring to me. I've rated the book based on an average, see below for individual story ratings and calculation. I'd recommend reading any of the stories I've rated as 3.5 or higher. My personal favourites were 'Button, button', 'Duel', and 'Deus ex machina'.
I found a review that categorised the collection into three themes, which I agree with:
- Stories which paint a portrait of individuals who suddenly find themselves alone and afraid in an unfamiliar or threatening world
- Stories that examines the fragility and antifragility of relationships, which keep people strong and sane under pressure, but which can also imperil them in times of crisis
- Stories which anatomise the manias of people in a state of quiet desperation, painting portraits of minds that have slipped into in a state of mania, and teaching us that anger is a momentary madness, as are fear and anxiety
As a side note, I enjoyed the intro by Victor Valvalle, don't skip this part!
Born of man and woman - 2.5
Prey - 3.5
Witch war - 1
Shipshape home - 2
Blood son - 2
Where there's a will - 2
Dying room only - 1.5
Counterfeit bills - 1
Death ship - 2
Dance of the dead - 1.5
Man with a club - 2
Button, button - 4
Duel - 4
Day of Reckoning - 2
The prisoner - 2
Dress of white silk - 3.5
Haircut - 2
Nightmare at 20,000 feet - 4
The funeral - 2
Third from the sun - 3
The last day - 4
Long distance call - 4
Deus ex machina - 4
One for the books - 4
Now die in it - 2.5
The conqueror - 2.5
The holiday man - 2
No such thing as a vampire -2.5
Big surprise - 1.5
A visit to Santa Claus - 3
Finger prints - 2
Mute - 3
Shock wave - 3.5
86 / 33 = 2.6 average
Quotes that stood out to me
"When life was dull, any element added seemed unnaturally intriguing." - excerpt from Long distance call
"Death is a fascinating lure to men who can stand aside and watch it operate on someone else." - excerpt from The conqueror
"He was the one. How could he have failed to know it? His fear, his dread, his hatred. His fear if also being scrapped, replaced; his dread if being shut out from the things he loved and needed; he hatred of a world that had no use for aged things." - excerpt from Shock wave
Minor: Death, Blood, Injury/Injury detail
adventurous
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Good premise but underexplored. I'm not invested enough to continue with the rest of the series.
The premise: a world where 99.9% of murder victims (note: not death by other means) wake up in their beds naked and completely unharmed. The protagonist 'kills' people for a living aka 'dispatching' people with fatal injuries so that they survive. There are of course grey areas to how this service is used.
Why it's underexplored: It didn't feel like the implications of such a world were explored as thoroughly as I'd have liked. We are given a very narrow view of how this phenomenon has impacted the world; through the well worn lens of murder-mystery-cop-thriller. A dispatcher and a cop buddy up to investigate a missing person case, very standard. Even the explanations given through the dialogue seemed forced. Some characters seemed ignorant of the reality they're living in, e.g., the cop Langdon. There were several conversations that seemed awkwardly inserted just so the reader could be caught up to speed how this phenomenon operates. It reads clumsily when compared to scifi greats such as James Triptree who managed to convey much more complicated premises without direct explanation.
Overall, I enjoyed the story for what it was and I enjoyed the audiobook performance. Not a masterpiece, but not every book needs to be.
The premise: a world where 99.9% of murder victims (note: not death by other means) wake up in their beds naked and completely unharmed. The protagonist 'kills' people for a living aka 'dispatching' people with fatal injuries so that they survive. There are of course grey areas to how this service is used.
Why it's underexplored: It didn't feel like the implications of such a world were explored as thoroughly as I'd have liked. We are given a very narrow view of how this phenomenon has impacted the world; through the well worn lens of murder-mystery-cop-thriller. A dispatcher and a cop buddy up to investigate a missing person case, very standard. Even the explanations given through the dialogue seemed forced. Some characters seemed ignorant of the reality they're living in, e.g., the cop Langdon. There were several conversations that seemed awkwardly inserted just so the reader could be caught up to speed how this phenomenon operates. It reads clumsily when compared to scifi greats such as James Triptree who managed to convey much more complicated premises without direct explanation.
Overall, I enjoyed the story for what it was and I enjoyed the audiobook performance. Not a masterpiece, but not every book needs to be.
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
I think it's much better to go into this book without knowing too much. The story unfolds relatively evenly and the developments and realisations are more powerful if you don't know them beforehand. The absolute minimum information you need to know is that this is a book about frienship, family, and Queerness in southeastern Nigeria. It is heartbreaking in a sad and a happy way. I definitely recommend reading it. I particuarly enjoyed listening as an audiobook due to the excellent performances and accents.
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Biphobia, Deadnaming, Death, Domestic abuse, Homophobia, Misogyny, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Transphobia, Grief, Lesbophobia, Sexual harassment, Injury/Injury detail
Describes absence seizures or dissociative fugue states and the difficulties accompanying them.
challenging
hopeful
informative
inspiring
reflective
sad
medium-paced
The best book I've ever read on bisexuality. As a bi person myself, I fully endorse and recommend this book to queer people and straight people. Shaw's closing words perfectly capture my satisfaction with her work: “I wrote this book because this book didn't exist, and I had so many questions about bisexuality.” I particularly appreciate that it is not US-centric. Shaw writes predominently from a UK perspective, but draws examples from around the world.
It covers both the approach of bisexuality as a behaviour, and bisexuality as an identity. (Yes, these are different things.) It covers all the important territory concisely without feeling dismissive or sweeping. Topics covered include: the academic study and classification of bisexuality, bisexual researchers and activists, history of opression against bisexual people, specifics to biphobia such as double discrimination, specifics to bi culture and expression such as bi camoflage, and the intersectionality of gender, disability, race, and bisexuality. It explores the stereotypes attached to bisexuality too such as hypersexuality, threesomes, and polyamoury. I loved that the book also included copies of the McKinsey scale and Klein grid for the reader to fill out and reflect upon.
Although it covers tough subjects like discrimination, Shaw definitely shines through as hopeful and proud about her own bisexuality and consistently encourages bi people to also shine bright and connect with each other if they have the opportunity and privilege to do so. This is particuarly evident in the audiobook. "I worry that sometimes there's too much focus on the negatives of being part of a sexual minority. I think that we shouldn't ignore hardship. But also should not centre bisexual identities on it."
Favourite quotes
It covers both the approach of bisexuality as a behaviour, and bisexuality as an identity. (Yes, these are different things.) It covers all the important territory concisely without feeling dismissive or sweeping. Topics covered include: the academic study and classification of bisexuality, bisexual researchers and activists, history of opression against bisexual people, specifics to biphobia such as double discrimination, specifics to bi culture and expression such as bi camoflage, and the intersectionality of gender, disability, race, and bisexuality. It explores the stereotypes attached to bisexuality too such as hypersexuality, threesomes, and polyamoury. I loved that the book also included copies of the McKinsey scale and Klein grid for the reader to fill out and reflect upon.
Although it covers tough subjects like discrimination, Shaw definitely shines through as hopeful and proud about her own bisexuality and consistently encourages bi people to also shine bright and connect with each other if they have the opportunity and privilege to do so. This is particuarly evident in the audiobook. "I worry that sometimes there's too much focus on the negatives of being part of a sexual minority. I think that we shouldn't ignore hardship. But also should not centre bisexual identities on it."
Favourite quotes
"It is not practical for most of us to get rid of labels entirely but we must also not attribute too much power or elegance to them."
"The bisexual activist Robyn Ochs defines bisexuality as "the potential to be attracted—romantically and/or sexually—to people of more than one sex and/or gender, not necessarily at the same time, not necessarily in the same way, and not necessarily to the same degree."
Valuing honesty impacts bisexuals differently to straight or gay people. Where all might uphold honesty as a family value only bisexuals grapple with how living day to day in a monogamous relationship might be interpreted as deceitful unless they disclose their bisexuality to others.
"The reason the alliance between bi and trans people is so natural is because both represent a fluidity and destruction of binaries that make people uncomfortable."
Three factors impacting mental health of bisexual people:
1) Double discrimination (monosexism from queer and hetero communities)
2) Isolation from queer community
3) Internal biphobia
Literarybear's review:
Diving into books on LGBTQ+ history can sometimes feel overwhelming. Where do I start? What should I already know? How do I narrow down to my specific interests? This book is incredibly helpful because it answers a lot of those questions for you. I found the text to be accessible, modern, and well-researched. It gives just enough history to orient the reader and provide context without becoming dull. The text also highlights many issues specific to the bi community, which seems difficult to find. Some sections address tough topics, but the author frames them well and the reader is made aware of what’s coming. This is a useful and easy to read text that should be widely read by those inside and outside the bisexual community.
Thanks to NetGalley and Abrams for this eARC.