Take a photo of a barcode or cover
320 reviews by:
raesengele
Showing DNF reviews ·
Clear filter
5 reviews
Right off the top: this is not the LGBT friendly cyberpunk book that it's advertised as. Yes, it's full of queer characters, but in the way of the 50s and not a queer woman in the modern era. Seriously, if the author's queerness hadn't been included in her bio I would have thought this was written by someone outside of the community.
This is my second attempt to get through this book and though I got further this time, I've been absolutely dragging my feet doing so. The base concept of Autonomous is intriguing, but every primary character (except for Jack) and the romances are so uncomfortable they were getting in the way. I read other reviews to get a feel for if I should just push through and decided from there it's just not worth it. I'm already tired of man is clearly into other man but even after having sex with him refuses to admit his feelings because "I'm not gay" (or the f-slur which Newitz uses a shocking amount for a queer woman) types of stories and I was willing to push through if the book ended with him getting past that, but since he seemingly doesn't AND gets away with it by coercing his genderless android partner to change pronouns for him I'm just not here for that. I'm also just not here for Jack's weird relationship with Threezed. The power imbalance is just too much even if Jack is (poorly) fighting against it.I skimmed the scene with Jack's ill-fated partner which was just disappointing as well. It felt so akin to Cosima and Delphine in Orphan Black but with a heavy dose of bury your gays and I'm just tired of that, as well. I guess I'm just already too tired with the state of the world to give my time to a book focusing on characters and topics that are even more bleak.
This is my second attempt to get through this book and though I got further this time, I've been absolutely dragging my feet doing so. The base concept of Autonomous is intriguing, but every primary character (except for Jack) and the romances are so uncomfortable they were getting in the way. I read other reviews to get a feel for if I should just push through and decided from there it's just not worth it. I'm already tired of man is clearly into other man but even after having sex with him refuses to admit his feelings because "I'm not gay" (or the f-slur which Newitz uses a shocking amount for a queer woman) types of stories and I was willing to push through if the book ended with him getting past that, but since he seemingly doesn't AND gets away with it by coercing his genderless android partner to change pronouns for him I'm just not here for that. I'm also just not here for Jack's weird relationship with Threezed. The power imbalance is just too much even if Jack is (poorly) fighting against it.
I haven't touched this book nor felt compelled to since 2016. I think it's time to admit defeat and DNF it. Charlotte Bronte just is not for me and I'm not going to force myself to read anymore of it. Sorry.
I think this is just one of those wrong book, wrong time situations. I enjoyed the writing, but the plot was just moving too slow and I found I wasn't excited to pick it up and even forgot I was reading it a few times. I'll admit, I read the plot on Wikipedia to decide if I wanted to keep going and where it's headed plus the fact that there's a equally chonky sequel made me decide now is just not the time to push through this book. Maybe another time when I'm feeling more patient, but we'll have to see 🤷🏻♀️
DNF - I read the first chapter and realized that I just didn't care enough about these characters or this story to continue reading.
While I found this book interesting enough, it was way too prescriptive for my liking. I've been finding more and more that KM Weiland likes to tell you that her way of writing is the only way of writing, and this book especially is bad about that. This isn't a book about structure, it's a book on how KM Weiland approaches structure. Turns out she's extremely fond of the "Hollywood" standard of writing, which clings WAY too steadfastly to its precious three acts, and she's very quick to tell you that if you deviate from those three acts your book will fail, which is by no means the case. I would have liked this book much more if she had explored the many variations on structure that exist rather than only presenting the three acts and leaving it at that. I guess I'm just tired of hearing people hand out rigid advice that encourages writers not to experiment with writing. Too many writers are more concerned with marketability than they are with telling a story and it's sad to see so many people accept their word as fact.