Take a photo of a barcode or cover
pepperthephoenix's Reviews (821)
I adore this book! I was a beta reader and now I own the arc in order to write a review! It’s a spiritual cousin to The Haunting of Hill House, the Uninvited, and the Hammer films. Full of Lovecraftian horror, dry British humor, and *lots* of body horror.
The book is about Carrie Rickard, a shattered young woman running away from a bad breakup, and buys a house in a small town in England. But not just any house: a living house that has seen more terrible things than a torture chamber. Also, her neighbor is not what he seems and is the greatest danger Carrie will ever face. Carrie can’t even find relief in the town, because it has its own dark and twisted history. On top of all that, someone is desperate to kill Carrie before she can unravel the town’s many secrets.
This book has everything a horror lover could want. Angry ghosts, cannibals, zombies, werewolves, fate, and immortals. The characters are well developed and engaging (but very few are truly likeable or sympathetic) with the MC being realistically overwhelmed by their circumstances but still strong and determined. Her neighbor, Ricky Porter is a terrible little sh*t who I had a hard time feeling sympathy for even though I think the author wanted me to. For spoilerish reasons, I consider him the main antagonist in the book. There are other antagonists, but they never truly feel like Carrie’s antagonists. They’re people who target Carrie, but not because she’s a true threat. It’s because she’s an innocent who bought the wrong house. Her real struggle is with Ricky and the house itself and I found that part of the story more compelling than some of the other subplots (although I also found some parts didn’t have the emotional beats and resolution they deserved).
The other ‘antagonists’ are terrible and deserve what happens to them, but they’re not as memorable as Ricky Porter, except for maybe Beverly, Ricky’s grandmother. She’s a true evil bitch, haha. My favorite character is Mercy, an immortal with a lot of spunk and a great boyfriend, Jazz as well as her friend, Tina Harris, a mortician and the only character with common sense.
Like all true horror stories, it’s also a terrible tragedy, although I’m not sure if the tragic moments hit as hard as they should. There are wonderful moments of tensions and horror as well and those beats work better than the tragic beats, I think. The plotting is tight, the pacing is good for the most part, and, despite everything going on, resolves itself rather well.
While I love the characters and plot, it’s the world itself that won me over. It’s horrific, fantastic, beautiful, and rich. It *feels* real. Like I could fly to London and stumble upon Pagham (not that I would want to). The history seeps from every page, the monsters aren’t monsters, but really beings who *do* things. The author has thought through how someone would truly live with certain tendencies and how they would adjust to the modern world. The book also goes a great job exploring how trauma people would be if they lived in the center of paranormal activity. It twists you and corrupts you, even if you don’t participate in the horror. Someone you know or are related to most likely has and that stain will never go away. I don’t know if I like or sympathize with the character Guy, but I think he might be one of the most tragic characters in the book.
My *only* critic is that I found how the MC’s character arc to resolve a little unsatisfactory. I can’t say why for fear of spoilers, but I found how her relationship with Ricky ends was a little unrealistic/lacking in resolution. I felt there should have been more to that relationship. The book ends in a very wrapped up manner but that type of ending didn’t feel right for the story itself. But other than that, this is a fantastic little horror story and I can’t wait to read the sequels!
The book is about Carrie Rickard, a shattered young woman running away from a bad breakup, and buys a house in a small town in England. But not just any house: a living house that has seen more terrible things than a torture chamber. Also, her neighbor is not what he seems and is the greatest danger Carrie will ever face. Carrie can’t even find relief in the town, because it has its own dark and twisted history. On top of all that, someone is desperate to kill Carrie before she can unravel the town’s many secrets.
This book has everything a horror lover could want. Angry ghosts, cannibals, zombies, werewolves, fate, and immortals. The characters are well developed and engaging (but very few are truly likeable or sympathetic) with the MC being realistically overwhelmed by their circumstances but still strong and determined. Her neighbor, Ricky Porter is a terrible little sh*t who I had a hard time feeling sympathy for even though I think the author wanted me to. For spoilerish reasons, I consider him the main antagonist in the book. There are other antagonists, but they never truly feel like Carrie’s antagonists. They’re people who target Carrie, but not because she’s a true threat. It’s because she’s an innocent who bought the wrong house. Her real struggle is with Ricky and the house itself and I found that part of the story more compelling than some of the other subplots (although I also found some parts didn’t have the emotional beats and resolution they deserved).
The other ‘antagonists’ are terrible and deserve what happens to them, but they’re not as memorable as Ricky Porter, except for maybe Beverly, Ricky’s grandmother. She’s a true evil bitch, haha. My favorite character is Mercy, an immortal with a lot of spunk and a great boyfriend, Jazz as well as her friend, Tina Harris, a mortician and the only character with common sense.
Like all true horror stories, it’s also a terrible tragedy, although I’m not sure if the tragic moments hit as hard as they should. There are wonderful moments of tensions and horror as well and those beats work better than the tragic beats, I think. The plotting is tight, the pacing is good for the most part, and, despite everything going on, resolves itself rather well.
While I love the characters and plot, it’s the world itself that won me over. It’s horrific, fantastic, beautiful, and rich. It *feels* real. Like I could fly to London and stumble upon Pagham (not that I would want to). The history seeps from every page, the monsters aren’t monsters, but really beings who *do* things. The author has thought through how someone would truly live with certain tendencies and how they would adjust to the modern world. The book also goes a great job exploring how trauma people would be if they lived in the center of paranormal activity. It twists you and corrupts you, even if you don’t participate in the horror. Someone you know or are related to most likely has and that stain will never go away. I don’t know if I like or sympathize with the character Guy, but I think he might be one of the most tragic characters in the book.
My *only* critic is that I found how the MC’s character arc to resolve a little unsatisfactory. I can’t say why for fear of spoilers, but I found how her relationship with Ricky ends was a little unrealistic/lacking in resolution. I felt there should have been more to that relationship. The book ends in a very wrapped up manner but that type of ending didn’t feel right for the story itself. But other than that, this is a fantastic little horror story and I can’t wait to read the sequels!
A slightly dry, but fascinating read about the executions that took place during the Irish Civil War. Like his prior book on the Easter Rising Trial, Sean spends the first half of the book providing historical and legal context for the trials, before working through each execution in a linear process. This method can be a dry read, especially since he only provides short glimpses into the lives of those who are being executed, but that doesn’t mean this book isn’t interesting.
I bought this book immediately after I finished the new biography on Richard Mulcahy, since he played a central role in creating the execution rules and ensuring they were enforced. However, since this book is a look at the executions from a legal perspective, we miss some of the context regarding Mulcahy’s role as well as O’Higgin’s. It can also be hard to keep track of the long list of prisoners who were executed and when.
This book excels at discussing how a new state that didn’t have a national army or its own legal system had to create both things over night in the midst of a civil war. Enright does a great job highlighting the tension between the civil legal authority and the military authority (aka Mulcahy). He also does a great job trying to break out how many executions were committed with specific approval from the Irish Government and how many were committed by the soldier’s lack of discipline.
Enright is a fair historian and another one who is unusually favorable to Mulcahy despite his role in the 80 plus executions that took place during the war. Enright is clear when Mulcahy covered up military excesses, but also goes out of his way to point out when Mulcahy resisted Cosgrave’s and O’Higgin’s urgings to end the war quickly, increase executions, and wanting more information on what the national army was doing in general. I wish he had spent a little more time exploring O’Higgin’s motives for being so committed to execution as a useful tactic against the anti-Treatyites.
At the end of the book, Enright makes an interesting argument that Mulcahy supported executions because it was the only way to wrestle control over sanctioned death from the IRA and other non-governmental entities. It provides a new insight into how Mulcahy was handling transforming an insurgency into disciplined army. Enright also provides more evidence that the Squad Collins created during the Anglo-Irish War was a rotting infection inside the Irish Free State and its National Army-an infection that Mulcahy was struggling to control. That seemed to be another reason Mulcahy wanted the government to control execution policy. Better he decided who lived and died than the Squad-who only answered to Collins (who died early during the Civil War).
Overall, a well-written and balanced account on a controversial and painful moment in Irish history.
Pros: Interesting, legal perceptive
Fair and balanced account
Well-researched and exhaustive
Cons: Slightly dry
Missing nuance analysis because Enright doesn’t focus on interpersonal relations within the Cosgrave Administration
Would have liked more time spent on analyzing O’Higgin’s role in crafting the execution policy as well as Liam Lynch’s and Mulcahy’s relationship pre-Civil War and how that affected Mulcahy’s implementation of the executions.
I bought this book immediately after I finished the new biography on Richard Mulcahy, since he played a central role in creating the execution rules and ensuring they were enforced. However, since this book is a look at the executions from a legal perspective, we miss some of the context regarding Mulcahy’s role as well as O’Higgin’s. It can also be hard to keep track of the long list of prisoners who were executed and when.
This book excels at discussing how a new state that didn’t have a national army or its own legal system had to create both things over night in the midst of a civil war. Enright does a great job highlighting the tension between the civil legal authority and the military authority (aka Mulcahy). He also does a great job trying to break out how many executions were committed with specific approval from the Irish Government and how many were committed by the soldier’s lack of discipline.
Enright is a fair historian and another one who is unusually favorable to Mulcahy despite his role in the 80 plus executions that took place during the war. Enright is clear when Mulcahy covered up military excesses, but also goes out of his way to point out when Mulcahy resisted Cosgrave’s and O’Higgin’s urgings to end the war quickly, increase executions, and wanting more information on what the national army was doing in general. I wish he had spent a little more time exploring O’Higgin’s motives for being so committed to execution as a useful tactic against the anti-Treatyites.
At the end of the book, Enright makes an interesting argument that Mulcahy supported executions because it was the only way to wrestle control over sanctioned death from the IRA and other non-governmental entities. It provides a new insight into how Mulcahy was handling transforming an insurgency into disciplined army. Enright also provides more evidence that the Squad Collins created during the Anglo-Irish War was a rotting infection inside the Irish Free State and its National Army-an infection that Mulcahy was struggling to control. That seemed to be another reason Mulcahy wanted the government to control execution policy. Better he decided who lived and died than the Squad-who only answered to Collins (who died early during the Civil War).
Overall, a well-written and balanced account on a controversial and painful moment in Irish history.
Pros: Interesting, legal perceptive
Fair and balanced account
Well-researched and exhaustive
Cons: Slightly dry
Missing nuance analysis because Enright doesn’t focus on interpersonal relations within the Cosgrave Administration
Would have liked more time spent on analyzing O’Higgin’s role in crafting the execution policy as well as Liam Lynch’s and Mulcahy’s relationship pre-Civil War and how that affected Mulcahy’s implementation of the executions.
