Take a photo of a barcode or cover
2.01k reviews by:
ninetalevixen
I read the first six books in this series back to back to back so although I've rated them individually, I reviewed them collectively here.
3.5 stars.
I read the first six books in this series back to back to back so although I've rated them individually, I reviewed them collectively here.
I read the first six books in this series back to back to back so although I've rated them individually, I reviewed them collectively here.
I read the first six books in this series back to back to back so although I've rated them individually, I reviewed them collectively here.
content warnings:
This actually holds up quite well, particularly in that it respects female characters with individuals with their own motives and personalities. On a structural leve, I enjoyed the contrast between Bartimaeus's more mature POV — both in terms of being more wise and worldly, and also his frequent use of innuendo — and Nathaniel's youthful arrogance and short-sightedness; that said, they're both less charming than I remember. (Such is the rose tint of nostalgia, I guess.)
-----------
CONVERSION: 8.7 / 15 = 3 stars
Prose: 6 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 6 / 10
Emotional Impact: 5 / 10
Development / Flow: 6 / 10
Setting: 8 / 10
Intellectual Engagement: 2 / 5
Originality / Trope Execution: 3 / 5
Spoiler
abandoned by parents, classism, secondary character death(s), child abuse, bullying, threatened torture, claustrophobia, slaveryThis actually holds up quite well, particularly in that it respects female characters with individuals with their own motives and personalities. On a structural leve, I enjoyed the contrast between Bartimaeus's more mature POV — both in terms of being more wise and worldly, and also his frequent use of innuendo — and Nathaniel's youthful arrogance and short-sightedness; that said, they're both less charming than I remember. (Such is the rose tint of nostalgia, I guess.)
-----------
CONVERSION: 8.7 / 15 = 3 stars
Prose: 6 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 6 / 10
Emotional Impact: 5 / 10
Development / Flow: 6 / 10
Setting: 8 / 10
Intellectual Engagement: 2 / 5
Originality / Trope Execution: 3 / 5
.jpg)
I read the first six books in this series back to back to back so although I've rated them individually, I reviewed them collectively here.
content warnings:
The series finale feel doesn't really kick in until about halfway through (after Part 4 or so), at which point the long game becomes clear and all the buildup pays off; personally, I liked this because I don't love the Big Bad Boss Battle trope. I absolutely love the parallels between Nathaniel's and Kitty's arcs, and their parallels to Ptolemy.
Also, I will forever remain in denial about the ending.
-----------
CONVERSION: 7.8 / 15 = 3 stars
Prose: 5 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 7 / 10
Emotional Impact: 5 / 10
Development / Flow: 6 / 10
Setting: 6 / 10
Originality / Trope Execution: 2 / 5
Rereadability: 2 / 5
Spoiler
major character death(s), non-graphic violence, slaveryThe series finale feel doesn't really kick in until about halfway through (after Part 4 or so), at which point the long game becomes clear and all the buildup pays off; personally, I liked this because I don't love the Big Bad Boss Battle trope. I absolutely love the parallels between Nathaniel's and Kitty's arcs, and their parallels to Ptolemy.
Also, I will forever remain in denial about the ending.
-----------
CONVERSION: 7.8 / 15 = 3 stars
Prose: 5 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 7 / 10
Emotional Impact: 5 / 10
Development / Flow: 6 / 10
Setting: 6 / 10
Originality / Trope Execution: 2 / 5
Rereadability: 2 / 5
content warnings:
"I will hold fast to this new story, too, tuck it away beside my father's bedtime tales, beside Magda's tea talk. I will remember everything."
As debut novels go this isn't half bad — but for me it doesn't hold a candle to Schwab's better-known works, with their brilliant originality and vivid characters. That said, in the interest of fairness I'll try to review this one without emphasis of that comparison.
This novel's greatest strength is probably how atmospheric it is. Children's rhymes and whispered folktales and flowing physical descriptions of the moor/wind/moonlight paint a detailed picture of the town of Near and its inhabitants. Lexi is a keen observer of the world around her and has a lot of quotable thoughts: about the nature of secrets, of bad news, of night vs day.
Thematically, this is an objectively well-crafted narrative, though a bit heavy-handed and repetitive for my taste. A classic (literal) witch hunt, driven by fear of strangers and of harm to the town's children and, of course, of the quiet power of women. The consequences of those fears. The things that are done in the dark then revealed by morning light. The eerie lullaby of the wind, of the open moor.
The characters also fell somewhat flat, I think primarily because their relationships (whether familial or romantic) were so static, relying on the reader's expectations to automatically fill in the gaps. And you won't find much character development here. I did appreciate the subtle gray-morality, that the perceived antagonists aren't evil or cruel for the sake of it but rather because they feel driven to it, though this seems to fall by the wayside in the latter half.
But I think the most telling sign is that I just wasn't interested in learning more. My edition of The Near Witch includes the prequel story, [b:The Ash-Born Boy|13643876|The Ash-Born Boy (The Near Witch, #0.5)|Victoria Schwab|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1336677492l/13643876._SY75_.jpg|19259682], and I realized that I didn't care to read it.
-----------
CONVERSION: 7.9 / 15 = 3 stars
Prose: 6 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 5 / 10
Emotional Impact: 3 / 10
Development / Flow: 5 / 10
Setting: 8 / 10
Originality / Trope Execution: 3 / 5
Memorability: 2 / 5
Spoiler
child abductions, sexual harassment & possessiveness, threatened & off-page gun violence, (literal) witch hunt, precanon parent deaths, mentioned past child death, grief"I will hold fast to this new story, too, tuck it away beside my father's bedtime tales, beside Magda's tea talk. I will remember everything."
As debut novels go this isn't half bad — but for me it doesn't hold a candle to Schwab's better-known works, with their brilliant originality and vivid characters. That said, in the interest of fairness I'll try to review this one without emphasis of that comparison.
This novel's greatest strength is probably how atmospheric it is. Children's rhymes and whispered folktales and flowing physical descriptions of the moor/wind/moonlight paint a detailed picture of the town of Near and its inhabitants. Lexi is a keen observer of the world around her and has a lot of quotable thoughts: about the nature of secrets, of bad news, of night vs day.
Thematically, this is an objectively well-crafted narrative, though a bit heavy-handed and repetitive for my taste. A classic (literal) witch hunt, driven by fear of strangers and of harm to the town's children and, of course, of the quiet power of women. The consequences of those fears. The things that are done in the dark then revealed by morning light. The eerie lullaby of the wind, of the open moor.
The characters also fell somewhat flat, I think primarily because their relationships (whether familial or romantic) were so static, relying on the reader's expectations to automatically fill in the gaps. And you won't find much character development here. I did appreciate the subtle gray-morality, that the perceived antagonists aren't evil or cruel for the sake of it but rather because they feel driven to it, though this seems to fall by the wayside in the latter half.
But I think the most telling sign is that I just wasn't interested in learning more. My edition of The Near Witch includes the prequel story, [b:The Ash-Born Boy|13643876|The Ash-Born Boy (The Near Witch, #0.5)|Victoria Schwab|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1336677492l/13643876._SY75_.jpg|19259682], and I realized that I didn't care to read it.
-----------
CONVERSION: 7.9 / 15 = 3 stars
Prose: 6 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 5 / 10
Emotional Impact: 3 / 10
Development / Flow: 5 / 10
Setting: 8 / 10
Originality / Trope Execution: 3 / 5
Memorability: 2 / 5
3.5 stars
At first I was totally sure I was rereading this, because the beginning was super familiar; as I read on, I became less certain, and by the end I had decided that I probably just read an excerpt of the first couple of chapters (probably included at the end of Savvy). Part of my confusion came from how predictable the plot was — I knew exactly what would happen, but was it because I'd already read it or because it was tropey? (Or both?)
Still, it's a fun enough read. FRTC.
content warnings:
rep:
-----------
CONVERSION: 9.9 / 15 = 3.5 stars
Prose: 6 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 7 / 10
Emotional Impact: 7 / 10
Development / Flow: 8 / 10
Setting: 8 / 10
Diversity & Social Themes: N/A
Intellectual Engagement: 3 / 5
Originality / Trope Execution: 3 / 5
Rereadability: N/A
Memorability: 2 / 5
At first I was totally sure I was rereading this, because the beginning was super familiar; as I read on, I became less certain, and by the end I had decided that I probably just read an excerpt of the first couple of chapters (probably included at the end of Savvy). Part of my confusion came from how predictable the plot was — I knew exactly what would happen, but was it because I'd already read it or because it was tropey? (Or both?)
Still, it's a fun enough read. FRTC.
content warnings:
Spoiler
rep:
Spoiler
-----------
CONVERSION: 9.9 / 15 = 3.5 stars
Prose: 6 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 7 / 10
Emotional Impact: 7 / 10
Development / Flow: 8 / 10
Setting: 8 / 10
Diversity & Social Themes: N/A
Intellectual Engagement: 3 / 5
Originality / Trope Execution: 3 / 5
Rereadability: N/A
Memorability: 2 / 5