445 reviews by:

natreviews


This was a good read. Probably should've taken more time to read it, but it was really good. I love the art style and how it isn't afraid to tackle serious topics like toxic relationships (including how they can exclude those you care deeply about, the emotional manipulation, etc.), abortion, being queer, etc.

My rating: 3.5/5

I honestly bought this book for the illustrations. They are hands down the best part. They are so detailed! I do like the story that was also written alongside. I went in pretty much knowing nothing about this book, but that it illustrated mythological creatures. It's a nice coffee table book and cool to have in your collection. I'm not sure that I'll read it again though...

I thought, since it being Pride month and all, I should read a book that features LGBT+ characters. (Side note: I have already done that, as I now just remember).

I (like a lot of people) first heard of Carmilla through the web series on youtube. Then, I read the original tale by J. Sheridan Le Fanu. After a while, I found this book.

The original tales main theme is about how women's sexuality is bad and dangerous, warding against both it and vampires. Carmilla & Laura is from Laura's perspective, as in the original, and the same time period. It puts the WLW subtext of the original into plain text, while giving it a happy ending.

If you want to read a lesbian period piece, this is it. It's a quick read, and starts pretty slow, but ramps up about a third of the way through. It's cool to see S. D. Simper take the original story and make it her own. It reads closely enough to the original that it's like it's written the year the original was published. I know she has written other WLW novels, and will add them to my collection when I can.

As a last note: totally pictured Carmilla's mother as Lady Dimestrescu from Resident Evil Village. Interesting, huh?

Rating: 2.5/5

I originally heard of this book from booktok, and was super excited to read it.

To be honest, it's really boring. There isn't enough time in the beginning to really set up the characters and feel for them before the possession happens. I didn't find the story to be anything new or exciting. 

It's also surprisingly really homophobic. The F Slur is used twice within the first 3 pages, and then a character is described as a 'flaming queer'. I understand this book was written in 2003, but still. It didn't need to be in there.

I liked this. I liked how each poem had an explanation beforehand so you could understand what was actually going on.

In complete transparency, I didn't read every single poem, so I'm letting the pages I didn't read reflect the books I dropped/read partially, but didn't finish throughout this past couple of months.

Just to let you know, I am reading the omnibus edition, but for the sake of reviewing, I will be listing them as their separate novels.

I know the basics of the movie, and nothing really past that. From what I know, the movie is nothing like the book.

It's really hard to describe this book. A lot of the time, I had no clue what was really happening. It's purposefully written that way. This book is just really hard to describe. It's easier to read it than explain it I think.

I couldn't put this book down. It's one of those where the less you know, the better it is going in. All I knew is it was about a girl who lived in some walls. That's pretty much all you need to know going into this.
dark emotional mysterious sad tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

I had heard this book was a good read, but I was a bit weary going into it. I've had books where people recommend it so highly that have just fallen really flat. This is not that.

A Dowry of Blood does not shy away from it's main themes of manipulation and abuse. It didn't romanticize it, but at the same time didn't make it over the top. It was realistic... which is funny to say about a vampire book.

I heard mainly that this book was sapphic, which it kind of is? It features mlw, wlw, and mlm. The book features polyamory, so you get a whole mix of different relationship pairings. I will also mention, there is quite a bit of smut in here. I didn't expect that going in, but it was actually written well. Let me explain that part. I find a lot of smut is more characters are doing something plot related, then either take a break from the plot to have sexy times or sexy times just gets put in with no real reason. This book actually has the sexy times be there for a plot reason and to push the plot forward, which after reading multiple books (one I completed, and one I didn't) that feature smut written for non-plot related reasons was a nice change.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark emotional mysterious sad slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

I have pretty complicated feelings with this book.

I went back and forth whether to give this book a 4/5 or a 4.5/5. I think I'm learning that I'm growing out of the writing style of YA. I found the family/friend relationships to be kind of cheesy at times, but the horror to be frozen in your seat terrifying. 

This book alludes to Agatha Christie's Poirot Mysteries a lot of the time. Like one of those novels, I found the ending to go to great lengths to explain itself, and fall flat a bit. It's a complicated ending. It makes sense when you sit with it, but you just aren't there for it. I found that similar to Junji Ito's Uzumaki (a.k.a. Spiral for English readers). That you didn't want it to end there, but it does. 

I think this book sets out what it's intended to do, and if I was younger I would really enjoy it, but as a 22 year old, it just doesn't hit the way it could've.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings