Take a photo of a barcode or cover
lenorayoder's Reviews (149)
funny
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Enjoyable read, star deducted for the unfortunately period/location-typical racism. Much less second-hand embarrassment than the movie which was nice as I hate that.
Graphic: Fatphobia
Moderate: Alcoholism
Minor: Racism
reflective
I did like certain aspects of this book, but everything I liked feels like it could be executed in a way I would like even more. I understand why Guppy doesn't tell her stories chronologically, and I think that worked fine in The Blindfold Horse, but here I think it hurts more than it helps - especially when it becomes clear that things were moved around in editing. For example, she uses the term "Anglo-Saxons" occasionally throughout the book, and only when she uses it for the last time does she clarify that at the time the term was used for Americans and the English.
The pretty privilege you can read between the lines of this book is wild. Pretty people really just lead charmed lives, damn.
The pretty privilege you can read between the lines of this book is wild. Pretty people really just lead charmed lives, damn.
adventurous
I might have rated this 4 stars because I do think the world is cool, but the teen boy of it all gets to be a bit much, especially by the end of the book. At first I thought the main character was just an accurate portrayal of teen boyness, warts and all, but it becomes obvious as the book goes on that Wade can do no wrong (and actually those aren’t warts at all!) once he’s learned the Moral of the Story. Cline also really hits you over the head with said moral. And let’s not forget the clumsy exposition that continues throughout the novel. I can tolerate that at the beginning of a book, but the entire thing?? Also “rubenesque”. More than once. Kill me.
Kind of a bummer, because I think this book had a lot of potential. I still liked it though, and I’ll probably check out the sequel. I can definitely see why this was adapted into a movie and I’ll be checking that out too.
Kind of a bummer, because I think this book had a lot of potential. I still liked it though, and I’ll probably check out the sequel. I can definitely see why this was adapted into a movie and I’ll be checking that out too.
Moderate: Addiction, Murder, Classism
Minor: Bullying, Child abuse, Drug abuse, Fatphobia, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual content, Death of parent, Lesbophobia
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
I first read this book in high school and remember loving it. I decided to grab it from the library again because I was in the mood for something pensive and kind of sad and wanted to see if it held up as an adult. Boy, does it. This book is fantastic. Though the impact is different from when I was Charlie's age, this book is still so influential and offers so much with both its content and style. Weirdly, reading this book makes me feel inspired to write and like when I do so it will be better for having read this. Not that you could tell from the quality of this review!
I think this is one of those books you should definitely read at least once as a teen. As an adult I was definitely reacting differently to some moments -for the love of god, why would you give a kid who's obviously having mental/emotional difficulties LSD! Even as a high school senior, you should know that's a no no - but Chbosky and Charlie still draw me in. This book really elicits emotional reactions, and is best enjoyed on a quiet evening by yourself so you can really take your time to read between the lines and feel.
It's kind of ridiculous how many content warnings I just applied to this book, but I also think that's one of the reasons this is an important read for teens. That this book is written in the form of letters helps lower the intensity of these subjects/make them easier for the reader to handle, but things still get pretty emotional.
I think this is one of those books you should definitely read at least once as a teen. As an adult I was definitely reacting differently to some moments -
It's kind of ridiculous how many content warnings I just applied to this book, but I also think that's one of the reasons this is an important read for teens. That this book is written in the form of letters helps lower the intensity of these subjects/make them easier for the reader to handle, but things still get pretty emotional.
Graphic: Drug use, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Grief, Sexual harassment
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Child abuse, Cursing, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug abuse, Homophobia, Physical abuse, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Violence, Alcohol
Minor: Bullying, Gun violence, Incest, Infidelity, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Car accident, Abortion, Injury/Injury detail
mysterious
I liked this mystery, but I think one needs more knowledge of 1920’s England than I do to really appreciate this book. There are a lot of political elements that I just didn’t get and was unwilling to research. There are also a lot of characters and locations, and several characters have multiple pseudonyms. As someone with trouble remembering names I had a tough time even though I was writing them down in a notebook to keep track. That said, if you don’t have trouble with names and are familiar with English politics, you’re likely to have a good time. The plot meanders a little too much, and the xenophobic comments are irritating. I think the book is at its best when Tommy and Tuppence are together as they play off each other really well - unfortunately they spend much of the book apart.
funny
funny
reflective
I love McGovern’s art style. A fun yet depressing graphic novel that really captures a certain kind of emerging adult in the 2010s/20s.
I wish we got to see more of Katie and Skylar, I found that to be one of the more interesting dynamics. I found their storyline to be one of the few loose ends in this book.
I wish we got to see more of Katie and Skylar, I found that to be one of the more interesting dynamics. I found their storyline to be one of the few loose ends in this book.
funny
This was fun and I’d recommend it, but there are a few pacing issues that keep it from being great. Gets better towards the end, I enjoyed the last act a lot.
informative
slow-paced
There was some good information in this book, but I had to wade through pages and pages of repetition, advertising, and poorly executed testimonials. This book could have easily had 100 pages worth of content removed - this would have been a much nicer read and still would have given me all the same information. There are a couple of poorly done infographics, some of them because they clearly don't translate to black-and-white well. The author painstakingly explains some some concepts and whizzes through others, often in a way that doesn't make sense for the average reader's knowledge level.
The way this is written/presented is such a shame, because I think there's some interesting and valuable information here and I don't know how many people will wade through all the chaff to get to it (and they shouldn't have to!).
The way this is written/presented is such a shame, because I think there's some interesting and valuable information here and I don't know how many people will wade through all the chaff to get to it (and they shouldn't have to!).
mysterious
Strong character development:
No
This is Christie’s first novel and it’s so good! Every character is interesting, and Poirot is so fun and unique. I love how much she pokes fun at the narrator - I laughed out loud several times and was reminded of Austen’s subtle humor. Christie definitely had a Hastings in her life, as do we all.
I have to mention - there are several instances in the dialogue of period-typical racism. Because it’s always in dialogue it’s never clear if the author endorses it, although the (unreliable) narrator doesn’t give it a second thought. It’s possibly a commentary on rich and/or rural British attitudes of the time, but I can’t tell. Mostly antisemitic sentiments, as well as a mention of blackface.
I’m excited to read more of Christie’s works. She’s definitely one of those authors who deserves the hype!
I have to mention - there are several instances in the dialogue of period-typical racism. Because it’s always in dialogue it’s never clear if the author endorses it, although the (unreliable) narrator doesn’t give it a second thought. It’s possibly a commentary on rich and/or rural British attitudes of the time, but I can’t tell. Mostly antisemitic sentiments, as well as a mention of blackface.
I’m excited to read more of Christie’s works. She’s definitely one of those authors who deserves the hype!
Minor: Racism