I will admit that before listening to this book—I too occasionally found myself confused betwixt the Naomi’s. Naomi Klein—feminist, social activist, author, professor known for her criticism of corporate globalization, fascism, Eco fascism and capitalism. Naomi Wolf—former feminist who famously authored the ground breaking THE BEAUTY MYTH but turned right wing agitator & conspiracist. From those descriptions you can see why Klein wouldn’t want to be social media confused with Wolf. Once they appeared to have much in common but now are looking glass opposites. I won’t be confusing them again.
Klein spends much of the book drawing a line between herself and Wolf—reinforcing it again and again through each new topic. This process creates a nice format for addressing global and national concerns. For America it’s how we are splitting as a nation. Across our social fabric there is a reimagining of America creating a “mirror world”. Constructed of half-truths, falsehoods and conspiracies for profit and power, it is becoming home for an alarming number of Americans—and put someone like Trump in the White House.
There is a lot to take in here—the details make it feel academic while the doppelganger angle makes it feel more immediate and personal. I was exhausted by the end of it trying to digest it all. And I am winded now feeling overwhelmed in this review trying to synopsis it properly. If it feels like this review just kind of ends…..
I have graded the stories of this collection below and while they average to roughly a B, the stories collectively deserve higher praise for offering new perspectives and reaching for something more. Playing off the trope of black characters being the first to die in most horror genre experiences, this book makes the black girl the hero. This isn’t done by just swapping skin tones like a black Barbie or by having black characters run through white situations. Instead, most of the characters here arrive with the weight, knowledge and experience of being black in America and what they are forced to endure is often a result of that very experience. No coincidence that the stories I liked more exhibited this the most. And these stories aren’t just about survival but overcoming and a modicum of revenge—a payment for historical services rendered. There is also an effort to be inclusive of the LGBTQ community which is always welcome. Read this book and you will step through the horror genre looking glass.
HARVESTERS B+ Solid teen story with a deftly delivered twist—lean and mean.
WELCOME BACK TO THE COSMOS C Creates a good atmosphere but ultimately just deflates.
GHOST LIGHT C- Okay gimmick wasted with flawed characters.
THE BRIDES OF DEVIL’S BAYOU A- Good character work & myth building—very tense.
TMI B Not bad but disappointed when the gimmick I suspected was the gimmick I got.
BLACK PRIDE A- Loved the central idea of this revenge fantasy enough to just go with it.
THE SCREAMERS A+ Easily my favorite of the book—genuinely scary all the way through.
QUEENIUMS FOR GREENIUM D Annoying inconsistent characters in a who cares situation.
INHERITANCE C- Keep forgetting what this story was—for a reason.
BLACK GIRL NATURE GROUP A Good characters in a unique trap well told.
CEMETARY DANCE PARTY D+ Some fun moments but how it plays out doesn’t make much sense.
THE SKITTERING THING B+ Didn’t like at first but it didn’t let go and had me by the end.
THE BLACK STRINGS B- Kinda interesting but the central idea wears thin and finally makes no sense.
LOCAL COLOR C+ I love a treasure hunt but I didn’t care for what I found here.
FOXHUNT A- Kind of a history flash back without the time travel—quite satisfying.
I read this memoir by Jessie Conrad about her life with husband Joseph Conrad online. The edition was a rare hardback scanned into The Internet Archive. Had I not stumbled upon it on this site, I likely would never have heard of it let alone read it. Very few editions were printed during the author’s lifetime and it doesn’t appear to have been republished since. The combination of my fondness for Joseph Conrad and the rareness of the material has likely inspired some generosity when rating this book. With that in mind, the material is slight and uncritical and seems to drift—yet this is an intimate view of their lives—a window into history not opened anywhere else. The writing is very accessible and while clearly influenced by years of reading her husband’s work Jessie Conrad remains restrained and avoids parody. She mentions in her preface that she had been wanting to write something for much of their marriage but Joseph had requested she wait. Much of the memoir reflects how involved she was in his work, especially early on, and clearly the thought of finding her own voice surfaced somewhere along the way. And her creation is modestly admirable. As a fan I enjoyed reading as Joseph Conrad’s books were produced with a little bit of context and how their fortunes were affected by them. Also of interest was impact of one of their son’s going off to fight as part of the British forces in WW I. The drama of their long-distance concerns as they awaited any news good or bad about him does hit home. Accounts of the time present the much younger Jessie as an unremarkable and unlikely match for the genius but like most women of her era she was expected to serve her husband—this appears to be the point of the union. She certainly deserves credit for sustaining Joseph’s desire and ability to create but her memoir also shows her engagement in his work and perhaps influence. I suspect it was greater than she references, this being a habit of deference to her husband.
This book is an anguished cry. Most memoirs show growth or progress or resolution. This is not that kind of book. Instead it scuttles expectation by remaining a free fall into grief. There is no safety net of “this is how I got through it”, just the constant awareness of other—that grief always at your side. While the song of her grief is personal, anyone who has grieved can pick up the rhythm. This view into her anger and sadness is so precise that I found myself time and again saying, yes-yes that’s been me. The book itself mimics grief. It dwells in shock and pain and has the feeling of no forward movement. The world around her is still humming and churning forward but Adichie herself does not move. And then it ends. Abruptly. And I was left alone with my quiet reaction—grieving of sorts for a book I hoped would last longer.
Much of the reaction I have read to this book is critical of Adichie for not wrapping her grief up in a bow and giving the reader an “it’s gonna be okay” pat on the head. I applaud her for not writing the kind of book that she knows would not have done her any good.
For even more devastating takes on grief, check out Joan Didion’s THE YEAR OF MAGICAL THINKING and Edward Hirsch’s GABRIEL: A POEM. Hirsh’s book in particular left me decimated.
Consistently funny mockery of birds and the human condition. You probably didn't know that birds are constantly swearing and similar to the worst of us. Great gift book to have around as you can dip in anywhere, read a few naughty bits and be on your way. Delightful use of actual Audubon illustrations.
The better of the two Fitzgerald collections I have read this year. (TALES OF THE JAZZ AGE being the other which I liked but did have a couple clunkers in it.) His language is often gorgeous.
"And in front as a great mellow bell boomed the half -hour a swarm of black, human leaves were blown over the checker-board of paths under the courteous trees."
“This is the beauty I want. Beauty has got to be astonishing, astounding-- it's got to burst in on you like a dream, like the exquisite eyes of a girl.”
“This unlikely story begins on a sea that was a blue dream, as colorful as blue-silk stockings, and beneath a sky as blue as the irises of children's eyes. From the western half of the sky the sun was shying little golden disks at the sea--if you gazed intently enough you could see them skip from wave tip to wave tip until they joined a broad collar of golden coin that was collecting half a mile out and would eventually be a dazzling sunset.”
“Resignedly and with difficulty Tom removed the cigar—that is, he removed part of it, and then blew the remainder with a whut sound across the room, where it landed liquidly and limply in Mrs. Ahearn’s lap.”
All moments I loved. Every story a gem. Humor, heart and often with devastating insight.
I listened to the audiobook version of SOCIOPATH: A MEMOIR. Aside from Stephen Fry, this was probably the best narration by the author I have heard for an audiobook. Specifically, the author reflecting different aspects of herself with subtle variations of her own voice was quite effective. The voice and writing are all very persuasive—well crafted to have you believe the compelling path you are on. And you are happy to walk that path—the author has a successful and interesting life to talk about. Because of her status as a self-professed Sociopath she has a life that could turn at any second—and all come undone. Or at least that’s the plot line.
The idea of a sociopath is very compelling. The idea of a self-aware sociopath even more so. Almost like seeing a Unicorn. But gradually the author’s credibility begins to evaporate. During the second part of the book, when focusing on her education and her study of sociopathy, the nuts and bolts of her schooling feel like a hazy dream. By then it’s almost like someone came up to you and said they were a ghost. They may appear sincere and have good arguments—but really, a ghost?
Having heard the whole book now and done some background reading on the story—the whole book now feels like a performance piece. Perhaps if Andy Kaufman were still alive and began writing books it would feel something like this. There is a peculiar genius at work here—real or not—that cannot be easily dismissed. A sharp and tightly designed world is created where everything seems to box you in (reflecting the manipulative nature of a sociopath or someone pretending to be one). I enjoyed listening to this book but I am left unsettled. Almost as if the book was a flash mob that appeared out of nowhere, performed and then disappeared again leaving no trace of the whole experience. Where did this book take me—I’m just not sure.
Part of feeling unsettled, I feel that ironically a sociopath was using my own empathy against me.
This beautifully crafted art book has the same short-coming most beautifully crafted art books have for me—not enough text for context. Here this is mitigated by the portions of the book dealing with comics but still I would like to know more. There are intros for each body of work but the work itself goes mostly unremarked upon. The art is mostly creative and striking with a singular style and certainly deserves this presentation. Jamie Hewlett is mostly known for visualizing the cartoon fronted band GORILLAZ and his in your face offbeat TANK GIRL comic. I appreciated the career overview (which even includes creating an opera) but after looking at image after isolated image I kept wanting to go back to reading the TANK GIRL comics I was so hungry for words. Where I was most let down by the lack of narrative was the section on Bangladesh. I was very disappointed when this charity connected art project was only represented by about 6 pieces and each one begged to be fleshed out with at least a few words. To the book’s credit, I wanted more of every section but the Bangladesh portion in particular. For now, just going to figure out how to craftily acquire some TANK GIRL.
The flush in my cheeks as I start this review reminds me to add this caveat: I read this book mainly to satisfy part of a reading challenge (“read a romance with a fat lead”). While there seems to be an attempt recently to reclaim the “f” word I would still never use it. That being said, I will admit to a long standing, if standing at a distance, curiosity about the genre. Anything with such a passionate and extensive fan base has to raise at least an eyebrow. So I poked around for a popular author with the right main character and took the plunge. Emerging a few hundred pages later, I was just kinda baffled. How do I review this? If I relate it to what I normally like to read—I would destroy this book. I am handicapped by not knowing where it sits in relation to other Romance novels. Is Romance really its own world and any review from outside meaningless? So I will start with some positives. My favorite part relates to why I picked this book in the first place—the weight of the main character. Her weight is only referred to as an aspect of her attractiveness. There is no shaming, no commenting on what she eats or how people view her or any difficulties she has because she is heavier. I truly admired that aspect of the book. If not for the cover illustration, you wouldn’t know she was heavier until maybe a 100 pages into the book. There are quite a few attempts at humor and some of them do land—even the ones that don’t still create a pleasant atmosphere. I appreciated the sense of building a new community and a couple of the supporting characters were nicely drawn with little effort. A couple of moments were modestly moving—especially one in a cemetery at the end. And it was a fast read. Now for the negatives—it was a fast read. Very little other than occasional moments of disbelief at what I was reading made me want to slow down and savor. In fact I had to restrain a desire to skim over whole paragraphs. Much of the writing wasn’t bad but the idea seemed to be to paint the same image over and over until the picture was wet with hyper color. An entire paragraph devoted to pursed lips instead of what those lips might say. The swing in emotions is often ludicrous—character reactions extreme by any human standards. The shift from adoration to abominable cruelty and back at the bat of an eye is simply astonishing—I’m still suffering from whiplash. A third act surprise break-up I had been waiting 200 pages for was executed so irrationally that it still irritates me—I mean, grow up people. The gimmicky living arrangements of the main characters was a plot convenience that made little sense. Blasting audiobook porn out a home window in a small town and having everyone get into it stretched credulity among other things. And speaking of porn—not sure if this is reflective of Romance in general but holy macaroni some of this IS straight up porn. I could apply to medical school based on what was forced to visualize here. I wasn’t offended, just surprised. Is that my lesson from reading my first Romance novel—porn is the secret candy center to this whole enterprise. Read through a bunch of Goodreads and Storygraph reviews and found not a single mention of this aspect of the book so I’m forced to assume it’s par for the course—so to speak. The one thing I’ll remember the most was wading through one porn scene and the whole thing coming to a screeching halt for me because the author used the word “placket” (A placket is a finished opening in the upper part of trousers or skirts, or at the neck, front, or sleeve of a garment.) I had never seen that word before and it became a record scratch moment in the midst of fiery passion that I started laughing. Oh well, wasn’t my passion anyhow. Nor is this book. Or apparently Romance novels.