Take a photo of a barcode or cover
jenbsbooks's Reviews (2.41k)
I liked this ... 3* is like, it just didn't have a ton extra to make it one I'll remember, or that I'd go out of my way to recommend. I honestly think I avoided this a bit, because the cover reminded me of The Henna Artist, and I didn't love that one. The basic idea here also reminded me of the movie Lion.
I'd picked up a physical copy of this one, which bumps books up my TBR. I was able to get a Kindle copy from the library, and thought the audio was available, but that turned out to be the "adapted for young readers" version. I ended up spending an Audible credit to get the original, narrated by Simon Vance. It's been a while since I've heard Simon speak!
I really appreciated the author's notes, discussion questions and photos, included in the physical/Kindle copies (just one of the reasons I always try to get the text in addition to the audiobook). 42 chapters, just listed chronologically, there were headers (date/location) on some chapters, not included in the TOC. Per today's lacking standards, the physical copy doesn't even deign to have a TOC.
The story itself was good - based on Taz's actual story, but called fiction to allow to creative writing. We get the background of life in India, the taking of children to an orphanage, finding the children new homes ... or "selling" them.
No proFanity.
Swath.
I'd picked up a physical copy of this one, which bumps books up my TBR. I was able to get a Kindle copy from the library, and thought the audio was available, but that turned out to be the "adapted for young readers" version. I ended up spending an Audible credit to get the original, narrated by Simon Vance. It's been a while since I've heard Simon speak!
I really appreciated the author's notes, discussion questions and photos, included in the physical/Kindle copies (just one of the reasons I always try to get the text in addition to the audiobook). 42 chapters, just listed chronologically, there were headers (date/location) on some chapters, not included in the TOC. Per today's lacking standards, the physical copy doesn't even deign to have a TOC.
The story itself was good - based on Taz's actual story, but called fiction to allow to creative writing. We get the background of life in India, the taking of children to an orphanage, finding the children new homes ... or "selling" them.
No proFanity.
Swath.
While I liked this sequel to How The Penguins Saved Veronica ... I didn't LOVE it the way I did the first book. The latter just stood out so much, in the presentation (the blog posts), getting to know Veronica and Patrick. Here in the second book, it just didn't feel as unique. I'd adored the audio for the first book, and on my re-read (for bookclub) I went with the Kindle copy. I went with the audio for this book, I had to spend an Audible credit on it, as it wasn't available at any of my libraries (though not marked as an AudibleExlusive). Even the Kindle copy availability was sparse, but I was lucky enough to be able to borrow that (although I went primarily with the audio).
The narrators in the first book were WONDERFUL. They changed narrators here. I'm trying to be honest with myself and ask if I just didn't like them (Veronica was okay, but Terry/Patrick ... ) or was just stuck on my original experience/expectations.
In addition to the shift in narrators, here, we're also dealing with Terry and Patrick having problems (as is likely in most relationships, it's never really HEA) which just wasn't quite as fun to read about. A little more revelations into "Enzo" and his life. Another penguin adventure, again, not quite as happy go lucky as the first book.
Of course this is bringing some attention to the issues - plastics, pollution ... still a couple of times it felt a little bit preachy/political ... which it is. Even when I agree with an issue, that can make me uncomfortable (again, as intended ...)
No proFanity. A little talk of sex (and an unplanned pregnancy).
Other words I note: swathe, ablutions, frenetic ...
Some words I highlighted/looked up: perspicuity, perspicacity, pestiferous, penultimate ( why all "p" words?) *Ü*
There was also a little P&P ... "IT IS A truth universally acknowledged that a single penguin in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a friendship bracelet."
So overall, not sorry I spent the time with it, but a little sorry I spent a credit on it (this was a "one and done" I won't relisten) ... I wish it could have just been a borrow.
The narrators in the first book were WONDERFUL. They changed narrators here. I'm trying to be honest with myself and ask if I just didn't like them (Veronica was okay, but Terry/Patrick ... ) or was just stuck on my original experience/expectations.
In addition to the shift in narrators, here, we're also dealing with Terry and Patrick having problems (as is likely in most relationships, it's never really HEA) which just wasn't quite as fun to read about. A little more revelations into "Enzo" and his life. Another penguin adventure, again, not quite as happy go lucky as the first book.
Of course this is bringing some attention to the issues - plastics, pollution ... still a couple of times it felt a little bit preachy/political ... which it is. Even when I agree with an issue, that can make me uncomfortable (again, as intended ...)
No proFanity. A little talk of sex (and an unplanned pregnancy).
Other words I note: swathe, ablutions, frenetic ...
Some words I highlighted/looked up: perspicuity, perspicacity, pestiferous, penultimate ( why all "p" words?) *Ü*
There was also a little P&P ... "IT IS A truth universally acknowledged that a single penguin in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a friendship bracelet."
So overall, not sorry I spent the time with it, but a little sorry I spent a credit on it (this was a "one and done" I won't relisten) ... I wish it could have just been a borrow.
I'd heard so many rave reviews about this series ... but I struggled here with the first book and don't think I will continue on. Ironically, I just started the HBO series to see what I think of it, and quite like it so far. The presentation of things in the book just felt strange to me (but was well done, I thought, in the series). The writing, very sparse, simple sentences, not much description or transitions. Some dialog in quotes, other statements/thoughts just in the text. Third person, past tense.
It starts right off telling the reader about the detective agency, Mma Ramotswe, and the "case of the dubious daddy" (that phrasing was from the HBO series, not in the book). While not loving the book, I liked it, and felt it was a maybe a mix of Mrs. PiggleWiggle and Encyclopedia Brown, in Botswana.
Then ... Chapter 2 has the header (headers were not included in the Table of Contents) ALL THOSE YEARS AGO. One moment it is Precious "I am Precious Ramotswe, citizen of Botswana, daughter of Obed Ramotswe" and the statement "His life was unrecorded; who is there to write down the lives of ordinary people?" and then a space and "I AM Obed Ramotswe ..." I was going with the audio edition and I had to stop because I was confused (same narrator, now voicing Obed/first person?). I had to turn to the text to re-read the last sentence and see the space and figure that although we/the reader were just told his life wasn't recorded ... we are now getting a record of his life history. I was never sure exactly WHY we given this history, what exactly it really added to the story overall? In the HBO series, I thought it was brought out better (voiceover, "my father taught me many things ..." setting up better the lessons of observation and such, similar to "Psych").
Chapter 3 was "Lessons About Boys and Goats" and is more history, here as much about Precious's childhood than the father's life. Chapter 4 "Living With the Cousin and the Cousin's Husband" which DID showcase "her first case" solving a mystery (in the HBO series, there was an earlier introduction, which I thought was well done). In this chapter, it also introduces Note, who she marries (I really didn't care for this, feeling the father gave her such support, why did she get involved with an abusive man when she knew that about him, I felt she was a strong woman even back then). Such sparce information about some things too ... saying she was a "mother, for a brief and lovely five days" ... and that's all the info we get about her having a baby, and the baby dying. Chapter 4, we get an accounting of opening the agency and from there on out, it stayed in the present and covered a number of cases (a missing husband, a cheating husband, an amputated finger, a wayward daughter, a stolen car, an inconsistent doctor, and a missing 11-year old boy (the HBO series covers several of this in just the first episode).
The header for Chapter 10 is "MMA RAMOTSWE THINKS ABOUT THE LAND WHILE DRIVING HER TINY WHITE VAN TO FRANCISTOWN" and ... I guess it was just a short chapter to showcase Africa and her thought of "I am just a tiny person in Africa, but there is a place for me, and for everybody, to sit down on this earth and touch it and call it their own" but this just confused me. Did I miss something? Chapter 12 was "MMA RAMOTSWE’S HOUSE IN ZEBRA DRIVE" and that's pretty much what that chapter was, about the house ... and again, why?
I had not heard of Mma before, seems to be similar to Miss or Mrs (per Google, Mma" is a term used as a woman's title, usually to show respect or affection). In the audio, it was SO pronounced, mmmmMa and it kind of drove me crazy. Not something that would bother me in print, and pronounced much more subtly (just "ma") in the live adaptation.
I think I'll remember this - but when I see it recommended as a "so wonderful, so funny!" I just am still not sure why? I can see by ratings, and by the number of books in the series, that it IS popular, so I guess the book is just something that didn't really click with me.
It starts right off telling the reader about the detective agency, Mma Ramotswe, and the "case of the dubious daddy" (that phrasing was from the HBO series, not in the book). While not loving the book, I liked it, and felt it was a maybe a mix of Mrs. PiggleWiggle and Encyclopedia Brown, in Botswana.
Then ... Chapter 2 has the header (headers were not included in the Table of Contents) ALL THOSE YEARS AGO. One moment it is Precious "I am Precious Ramotswe, citizen of Botswana, daughter of Obed Ramotswe" and the statement "His life was unrecorded; who is there to write down the lives of ordinary people?" and then a space and "I AM Obed Ramotswe ..." I was going with the audio edition and I had to stop because I was confused (same narrator, now voicing Obed/first person?). I had to turn to the text to re-read the last sentence and see the space and figure that although we/the reader were just told his life wasn't recorded ... we are now getting a record of his life history. I was never sure exactly WHY we given this history, what exactly it really added to the story overall? In the HBO series, I thought it was brought out better (voiceover, "my father taught me many things ..." setting up better the lessons of observation and such, similar to "Psych").
Chapter 3 was "Lessons About Boys and Goats" and is more history, here as much about Precious's childhood than the father's life. Chapter 4 "Living With the Cousin and the Cousin's Husband" which DID showcase "her first case" solving a mystery (in the HBO series, there was an earlier introduction, which I thought was well done). In this chapter, it also introduces Note, who she marries (I really didn't care for this, feeling the father gave her such support, why did she get involved with an abusive man when she knew that about him, I felt she was a strong woman even back then). Such sparce information about some things too ... saying she was a "mother, for a brief and lovely five days" ... and that's all the info we get about her having a baby, and the baby dying. Chapter 4, we get an accounting of opening the agency and from there on out, it stayed in the present and covered a number of cases (a missing husband, a cheating husband, an amputated finger, a wayward daughter, a stolen car, an inconsistent doctor, and a missing 11-year old boy (the HBO series covers several of this in just the first episode).
The header for Chapter 10 is "MMA RAMOTSWE THINKS ABOUT THE LAND WHILE DRIVING HER TINY WHITE VAN TO FRANCISTOWN" and ... I guess it was just a short chapter to showcase Africa and her thought of "I am just a tiny person in Africa, but there is a place for me, and for everybody, to sit down on this earth and touch it and call it their own" but this just confused me. Did I miss something? Chapter 12 was "MMA RAMOTSWE’S HOUSE IN ZEBRA DRIVE" and that's pretty much what that chapter was, about the house ... and again, why?
I had not heard of Mma before, seems to be similar to Miss or Mrs (per Google, Mma" is a term used as a woman's title, usually to show respect or affection). In the audio, it was SO pronounced, mmmmMa and it kind of drove me crazy. Not something that would bother me in print, and pronounced much more subtly (just "ma") in the live adaptation.
I think I'll remember this - but when I see it recommended as a "so wonderful, so funny!" I just am still not sure why? I can see by ratings, and by the number of books in the series, that it IS popular, so I guess the book is just something that didn't really click with me.
I grabbed a paperback copy of this ... big, deckled edges. The audio and Kindle copy were available from my library. I went primarily with the audio. The music at the start/end was AWFUL. Luckily it didn't last long and wasn't throughout. Honestly, just 2.5 stars for me, as so much felt improbable, and the entire time I wondered why this title was chosen (as I had it stacked next to The Orphan Keeper and The Orphan Train in my personal library). This was much more about the circus, and the two women, than "the orphan" ... there are already SO many books out there with such a similar title.
Told in first person, present tense, alternating between two POVs ... Astrid and Noa. There is a prologue, it's one of those "mysterious" ones ... we don't know when or WHO it is (we are told it's "Paris" ) but this intro didn't add anything (but annoyance) for me. Chapter 1 is Noa/Germany 1944. Chapter 2 is Astrid/Germany 1942 ... I can't remember if the POVs stayed alternating consistently (while the POV is marked at the beginning of each chapter, it was not included on the Table of Contents in either Kindle or Audio, the physical copy doesn't even offer a TOC). It must have doubled up somewhere, as spot checking didn't always have Astrid only on even chapters.
Overall - it wasn't bad, it's just not a story where I really connected with the characters, enough to be emotionally involved. I didn't feel like I learned that much. I didn't have any passages I wanted to note/highlight/discuss, although I did appreciate the included discussion questions, author's notes and Q&A with the author (included in the Kindle/physical copy, not audio).
Quick mention of the Lebensborn program ... I just read The Sunflower House.
Just a few things, possible SPOILERS just the coincidence of this young girl, forced to give up her baby, happening to find a baby about the same age. Happening upon a circus and being taken in, and without any discussion, said they'd teach her to be an aerialist. Sure. Of course, she happens to have a history of gymnastics. That's convenient. The Visa and the money ... the "you go" "no you go" ... the fire, the deaths ...
I didn't really care for the ending.
No proFanity, one sex scene that while not really explicit, was more than seemed to fit with the rest of the story.
Told in first person, present tense, alternating between two POVs ... Astrid and Noa. There is a prologue, it's one of those "mysterious" ones ... we don't know when or WHO it is (we are told it's "Paris" ) but this intro didn't add anything (but annoyance) for me. Chapter 1 is Noa/Germany 1944. Chapter 2 is Astrid/Germany 1942 ... I can't remember if the POVs stayed alternating consistently (while the POV is marked at the beginning of each chapter, it was not included on the Table of Contents in either Kindle or Audio, the physical copy doesn't even offer a TOC). It must have doubled up somewhere, as spot checking didn't always have Astrid only on even chapters.
Overall - it wasn't bad, it's just not a story where I really connected with the characters, enough to be emotionally involved. I didn't feel like I learned that much. I didn't have any passages I wanted to note/highlight/discuss, although I did appreciate the included discussion questions, author's notes and Q&A with the author (included in the Kindle/physical copy, not audio).
Quick mention of the Lebensborn program ... I just read The Sunflower House.
Just a few things, possible SPOILERS
I didn't really care for the ending.
No proFanity, one sex scene that while not really explicit, was more than seemed to fit with the rest of the story.
Once upon a time, I loved finding a good series, committing to several books in a fictional world. Now, with a TBR a mile long, I'm more picky. There are so many series where I've read the first book, but don't choose to continue on. It says something when I see a series through to the end (even if it is just a trilogy). And this series is AudibleExclusive, so I had to PAY for it, which I did (there was a great sale).
This is such an interesting world Shusterman has created. The elimination of disease, injury (can still happen, but repairable), death ... and the issues this new world has (overpopulation, marriage "to death do us part" not really an option) and the introduction of Scythes and their service. The nanites which in addition to physical repairs, can change metabolism (weight loss) and emotion (depression). The Tone cult. Gender fluidity.
The unexpected humor ... "short people, they have no reason to live" or "no soup for you" ...
There are a TON of characters, and different settings, and the story switches between the various storylines and it can be a little hard to keep track of everything. All 3rd person/past tense for most (some Thunderhead is more present tense/first person). Single narrator throughout the series (Greg Tremblay) and he does a good job.
I have yet to read the short stories - Gleanings, but it's next on my list ...
For 600+ pages, this went pretty quickly.
This is such an interesting world Shusterman has created. The elimination of disease, injury (can still happen, but repairable), death ... and the issues this new world has (overpopulation, marriage "to death do us part" not really an option) and the introduction of Scythes and their service. The nanites which in addition to physical repairs, can change metabolism (weight loss) and emotion (depression). The Tone cult. Gender fluidity.
The unexpected humor ... "short people, they have no reason to live" or "no soup for you" ...
There are a TON of characters, and different settings, and the story switches between the various storylines and it can be a little hard to keep track of everything. All 3rd person/past tense for most (some Thunderhead is more present tense/first person). Single narrator throughout the series (Greg Tremblay) and he does a good job.
I have yet to read the short stories - Gleanings, but it's next on my list ...
For 600+ pages, this went pretty quickly.
I happened upon a physical copy of this book while doing some thrift store shopping (for my LFL) and saw this book had high reviews. Audible only ... but there was a sale, so I purchased the audio and was able to borrow the Kindle copy from the library. I went primarily with the audio, narrated by the author.
I was not familiar with the author - I've seen an episode or two of Orange, but it was a while back. I needed a non-fiction for the month, and I'm interested in immigration stories.
This felt a little like two books - one part following the struggle of her/her parents as they stayed in the country illegally, knowing that being caught and deported was always something that could happen. The mother was taken and deported once earlier in the memoir, somehow made it back (we don't know exactly how) before both parents were taken, leaving the young Diane alone.
She did have a friend/neighbor who took her in, and was able to visit her parents, and talk by telephone after they were deported to Columbia. But, she was struggling through the school system and life mostly alone, hiding the truth (just not sure what people would think), dealing with depression .
The second "storyline" is more about her pursuit of a career.
It kept my interest, and I felt I learned a little more about how things work (or don't), some of the struggles that I'm lucky enough not to have personal experience with. The author was a good narrator, very animated. The writing (with Michelle Burford) was easy and conversational.
The Kindle and physical copy had pictures. They were interspersed, at the end of each chapter. Having listened to the audio edition, and just flipping through the text, I would have preferred the pictures to all be together at the end, for easier viewing (although had I been reading on my own, I might have preferred this picture placement).
17 chapters, with an introduction and "Call to Action" (physical copy had a TOC) - I do think she makes some very good points in the "Call to Action" portion. Checking out the other covers (Kindle) one has a picture (of her) as a much younger child, maybe 6 or 7 ... which I think is a bit misleading (she was just 14 when her parents were taken, yet that IS a different visual). The new cover recreates the pose in adult form. It looks like the book was re-written for middle graders too ... it would be interesting to check it out and see how it compares (likely missing the language/proFanity x12) and some of the heavier and more titillating stuff? More just the immigration portions instead of her work in the industry?
First person/past tense - per usual for a memoir.
I was not familiar with the author - I've seen an episode or two of Orange, but it was a while back. I needed a non-fiction for the month, and I'm interested in immigration stories.
This felt a little like two books - one part following the struggle of her/her parents as they stayed in the country illegally, knowing that being caught and deported was always something that could happen. The mother was taken and deported once earlier in the memoir, somehow made it back (we don't know exactly how) before both parents were taken, leaving the young Diane alone.
She did have a friend/neighbor who took her in, and was able to visit her parents, and talk by telephone after they were deported to Columbia. But, she was struggling through the school system and life mostly alone, hiding the truth (just not sure what people would think), dealing with depression .
The second "storyline" is more about her pursuit of a career.
It kept my interest, and I felt I learned a little more about how things work (or don't), some of the struggles that I'm lucky enough not to have personal experience with. The author was a good narrator, very animated. The writing (with Michelle Burford) was easy and conversational.
The Kindle and physical copy had pictures. They were interspersed, at the end of each chapter. Having listened to the audio edition, and just flipping through the text, I would have preferred the pictures to all be together at the end, for easier viewing (although had I been reading on my own, I might have preferred this picture placement).
17 chapters, with an introduction and "Call to Action" (physical copy had a TOC) - I do think she makes some very good points in the "Call to Action" portion. Checking out the other covers (Kindle) one has a picture (of her) as a much younger child, maybe 6 or 7 ... which I think is a bit misleading (she was just 14 when her parents were taken, yet that IS a different visual). The new cover recreates the pose in adult form. It looks like the book was re-written for middle graders too ... it would be interesting to check it out and see how it compares (likely missing the language/proFanity x12) and some of the heavier and more titillating stuff? More just the immigration portions instead of her work in the industry?
First person/past tense - per usual for a memoir.
I must admit, it's been ages since I read Little Women. I'm not a hardcore fan. I'm not sure which is better in this case ... is the connection to that book the hook and draw, or will readers be a little disillusioned by the harsher look at war, and the imperfections of Mr. March (and Marmee).
While checking out thrift stores for books for my Little Free Library, I found a paperback copy and picked it up. Having a physical copy will move a book up my TBR, even though I still go with digital options overall. Here, I went with the audio BUT ... as Part2 started, I had to switch to reading. It was the same, male narrator, who had been voicing the first person Mr. March thus far, now suddenly he is Marmee? The same voice? First person, being read by a man, the same man/voice we already associate with Mr. March????? I don't care if it costs more to bring in a second (female) narrator. Do it! If it was third person ... okay, but not first person. I don't want to hear a man's voice reading about straightening her dress and caring for her husband. The final two chapters switched back to Mr. March's POV ... and I switched back to the audio. I was glad I had been able to borrow this from the library (although my main/local one didn't carry it). If I'd purchased this from Audible, I would have tried to return it. I'm going to select the Kindle copy for my format recorded here on Storygraph!
In addition to that audio "error" (in my opinion) - I was frustrated with the Table of Contents, it was difficult to switch between formats, as the breaks weren't consistent. The TOC in Kindle was just the most basic chronological listing. There were chapter headers, I don't know why these were not included on the TOC. The physical book, per usual for today's publications, doesn't even deign to provide a TOC. I did like that the chapter headings were printed along the top of the pages. Still, trying to find a specific spot requires a lot of random flipping, rather than knowing exactly what page a chapter/part starts on. While there were headers, they weren't super informative (Bread and Shelter, Scars, Yankee Leavening ...) When there was the switch to Marmee's POV, I would have appreciated a note indicating that. Not that it was that hard to figure it out, but there were moments of confusion. I had to stop the audio, pull up the Kindle copy, see if I'd missed something (especially as mentioned above, because it was the exact same voice/narrator).
As for the story itself - it was very bloody, lots of death and violence (it IS war), huge focus on slavery - which did have some enlightening moments. SO many words that aren't really used regularly today, some I'd want to stop and look up, highlight (espaliered, caducity, encomium, serried, alluvium, apogee, nadir, catarrh) ... there were lots more, those were ones I just stopped to record. Others that I know but notice - hectored, sibilance, desultory, excoriation. I made more notes in the Marmee section, I guess just feeling some connection to thoughts and feelings.
I feel now I should probably re-read LittleWomen.
While checking out thrift stores for books for my Little Free Library, I found a paperback copy and picked it up. Having a physical copy will move a book up my TBR, even though I still go with digital options overall. Here, I went with the audio BUT ... as Part2 started, I had to switch to reading. It was the same, male narrator, who had been voicing the first person Mr. March thus far, now suddenly he is Marmee? The same voice? First person, being read by a man, the same man/voice we already associate with Mr. March????? I don't care if it costs more to bring in a second (female) narrator. Do it! If it was third person ... okay, but not first person. I don't want to hear a man's voice reading about straightening her dress and caring for her husband. The final two chapters switched back to Mr. March's POV ... and I switched back to the audio. I was glad I had been able to borrow this from the library (although my main/local one didn't carry it). If I'd purchased this from Audible, I would have tried to return it. I'm going to select the Kindle copy for my format recorded here on Storygraph!
In addition to that audio "error" (in my opinion) - I was frustrated with the Table of Contents, it was difficult to switch between formats, as the breaks weren't consistent. The TOC in Kindle was just the most basic chronological listing. There were chapter headers, I don't know why these were not included on the TOC. The physical book, per usual for today's publications, doesn't even deign to provide a TOC. I did like that the chapter headings were printed along the top of the pages. Still, trying to find a specific spot requires a lot of random flipping, rather than knowing exactly what page a chapter/part starts on. While there were headers, they weren't super informative (Bread and Shelter, Scars, Yankee Leavening ...) When there was the switch to Marmee's POV, I would have appreciated a note indicating that. Not that it was that hard to figure it out, but there were moments of confusion. I had to stop the audio, pull up the Kindle copy, see if I'd missed something (especially as mentioned above, because it was the exact same voice/narrator).
As for the story itself - it was very bloody, lots of death and violence (it IS war), huge focus on slavery - which did have some enlightening moments. SO many words that aren't really used regularly today, some I'd want to stop and look up, highlight (espaliered, caducity, encomium, serried, alluvium, apogee, nadir, catarrh) ... there were lots more, those were ones I just stopped to record. Others that I know but notice - hectored, sibilance, desultory, excoriation. I made more notes in the Marmee section, I guess just feeling some connection to thoughts and feelings.
I feel now I should probably re-read LittleWomen.
I'd read the first book, Moloka'i back in August, and I liked it ... but didn't feel compelled to continue on. This hadn't been intended as a series, and this book was written years after the first, and is more of a companion, than a continuation. Much of the story is happening in tandem with Moloka'i, and some of the final scenes there, are repeated here, then expanded. Honestly, I didn't really remember a ton from the first story, and that was okay.
I had this in all three formats. I'd picked up a physical copy (thrift store or library sale, for my Little Free Library) and that brought it back to my TBR. I borrowed the audio and Kindle copy from the library (Libby, but also on Hoopla) and went primarily with the audio. Here, I think the audio added to the ambience with the accents, better than my imagination would have. I like having the Kindle copy for reference, and I pulled it up several times to make notes/highlights, look up words, and check out the extras ...
One of the things that pushed this to a 5* for me, was the extras. There was a map, and photographs (by Ansel Adams), a Q&A with the author that was super interesting, extensive author's notes with a lot of additional information (clarifying some of the factual events/people), discussion questions. It really added to the whole experience.
Per the "conversation with the author" ... this had "a perfect three-act structure to Ruth’s life: her childhood in Honolulu and California; her internment during World War II; and the final third of the novel, Ruth’s meeting with Rachel and her 22-year relationship with her birth mother" and it was divided into three parts, with chronological chapters running throughout.
This really brought to life the experience of the Japanese, forced to leave their homes and move to internment camps. I had read "They Called Us Enemy" (hadn't realized it was a graphic novel when I downloaded it) ... but it had presented this situation very well also. I think this part of the story was the most heavily "historical" part, where lessons on history and life, could be learned. There could be many interesting discussion topics on this, comparisons to the Jews in Germany, to Muslims in America after 9-11, to views on immigrants today.
Another recent read of mine was [book:The Other Family Doctor: A Veterinarian Explores What Animals Can Teach Us About Love, Life, and Mortality|61327479] - stories from a vet. Here, Ruth has a strong love/connection to animals, and wanted to become a vet, but that path wasn't open to her at this time in history. There was a strong focus on animals and the part they play in lives ... and a satisfying circle in the storyline (I don't think it's much of a spoiler to say Ruth's daughter becomes a veterinarian).
It would have been interesting to read the books back-to-back, to see if perhaps some portions might have been too repetitive, or if the overlap wasn't that much. Honestly, I don't remember more than the basics of the Rachel/Ruth reunion in the first book.
There were two uses of proFanity - other words I noted (either I had to look up the meaning/unfamiliar, or just not as common, enough that I highlighted them) ... swath (this was the Wordle word and my son had just asked me what it meant, when bam, there it was in my book!), caromed, quiescent, susurrus (love this one), bellicose, kayoed (I thought it would be KO-ed, knocked out) ... in the author's notes; indefatigable (love it!) and canard (hadn't heard that before).
I had this in all three formats. I'd picked up a physical copy (thrift store or library sale, for my Little Free Library) and that brought it back to my TBR. I borrowed the audio and Kindle copy from the library (Libby, but also on Hoopla) and went primarily with the audio. Here, I think the audio added to the ambience with the accents, better than my imagination would have. I like having the Kindle copy for reference, and I pulled it up several times to make notes/highlights, look up words, and check out the extras ...
One of the things that pushed this to a 5* for me, was the extras. There was a map, and photographs (by Ansel Adams), a Q&A with the author that was super interesting, extensive author's notes with a lot of additional information (clarifying some of the factual events/people), discussion questions. It really added to the whole experience.
Per the "conversation with the author" ... this had "a perfect three-act structure to Ruth’s life: her childhood in Honolulu and California; her internment during World War II; and the final third of the novel, Ruth’s meeting with Rachel and her 22-year relationship with her birth mother" and it was divided into three parts, with chronological chapters running throughout.
This really brought to life the experience of the Japanese, forced to leave their homes and move to internment camps. I had read "They Called Us Enemy" (hadn't realized it was a graphic novel when I downloaded it) ... but it had presented this situation very well also. I think this part of the story was the most heavily "historical" part, where lessons on history and life, could be learned. There could be many interesting discussion topics on this, comparisons to the Jews in Germany, to Muslims in America after 9-11, to views on immigrants today.
Another recent read of mine was [book:The Other Family Doctor: A Veterinarian Explores What Animals Can Teach Us About Love, Life, and Mortality|61327479] - stories from a vet. Here, Ruth has a strong love/connection to animals, and wanted to become a vet, but that path wasn't open to her at this time in history. There was a strong focus on animals and the part they play in lives ... and a satisfying circle in the storyline (I don't think it's much of a spoiler to say Ruth's daughter becomes a veterinarian).
It would have been interesting to read the books back-to-back, to see if perhaps some portions might have been too repetitive, or if the overlap wasn't that much. Honestly, I don't remember more than the basics of the Rachel/Ruth reunion in the first book.
There were two uses of proFanity - other words I noted (either I had to look up the meaning/unfamiliar, or just not as common, enough that I highlighted them) ... swath (this was the Wordle word and my son had just asked me what it meant, when bam, there it was in my book!), caromed, quiescent, susurrus (love this one), bellicose, kayoed (I thought it would be KO-ed, knocked out) ... in the author's notes; indefatigable (love it!) and canard (hadn't heard that before).
I liked this, but I'm a self-admitted sucker for "what if" alternate life-choice type stories. I'd had this on my list for a loooooong time, but while my library had the Kindle copy, no audio available there. It was on Audible, but I wasn't committed to PAYING for it, using up a precious credit. When I found a hardcopy at a thrift store, I picked it up (end goal, for my Little Free Library) and that brought it back to my attention. With an Amazon purchase, came a 3-month free AmazonMusic subscription, and recently, one free Audio borrow a month was included with that so ... I grabbed this as my February freebie (I don't even know that I'll listen to any music, just got the deal to get three audiobook borrows *Ü*).
For some reason I had it in my mind that this was about dancing ... maybe just the title? Silly me. No ballerina here. Paranormal, little group with abilities set apart from the "normal" world. Our MC can "see the future" sort of. Only for herself, and only when faced with a choice, and she can "search" to see what would happen as a result of that decision, either way. Interesting set up.
The use of "tense" here was interesting ... the first two chapters are past tense (first person, Addie's POV) as her "choice" is set up, to stay with Mom in the community, or go with Dad out to the normal world. Then, most of the book is her "search" of these two possible paths, and it switched to present tense for this. The two different paths weren't really defined by a header or anything, but they were still fairly easy to keep straight (whether she was still in the community with Duke/odd numbered chapters, or outside, with Trevor/even numbered chapters). In the TV series "Awake" had a basic premise similar, two "lives" ... one with his wife, one with his son, and he would wear a colored band to help him/and us, the viewer/ to keep them straight. The film also had a slightly different colored tint. I liked that). I wondered if it would revert to past tense when the search was over, but it stayed present tense to the end.
The storyline wasn't what I was expecting (ballerina *Ü*) but I liked it. It felt young, it IS YA ... it was a tad darker than I had anticipated (some murder, purposeful injury). No proFanity though, a couple slight sexual situations but nothing at all explicit.
I am interested in reading the sequel, seeing what happens next. Doesn't look like it was ever made into audio, so I'd have to read it on my own. This audio ... I wasn't sure about the drawl in the Dad/Normal/Trevor path, just always felt a little forced to me (I am not an expert in that accent).
For some reason I had it in my mind that this was about dancing ... maybe just the title? Silly me. No ballerina here. Paranormal, little group with abilities set apart from the "normal" world. Our MC can "see the future" sort of. Only for herself, and only when faced with a choice, and she can "search" to see what would happen as a result of that decision, either way. Interesting set up.
The use of "tense" here was interesting ... the first two chapters are past tense (first person, Addie's POV) as her "choice" is set up, to stay with Mom in the community, or go with Dad out to the normal world. Then, most of the book is her "search" of these two possible paths, and it switched to present tense for this. The two different paths weren't really defined by a header or anything, but they were still fairly easy to keep straight (whether she was still in the community with Duke/odd numbered chapters, or outside, with Trevor/even numbered chapters). In the TV series "Awake" had a basic premise similar, two "lives" ... one with his wife, one with his son, and he would wear a colored band to help him/and us, the viewer/ to keep them straight. The film also had a slightly different colored tint. I liked that). I wondered if it would revert to past tense when the search was over, but it stayed present tense to the end.
The storyline wasn't what I was expecting (ballerina *Ü*) but I liked it. It felt young, it IS YA ... it was a tad darker than I had anticipated (some murder, purposeful injury). No proFanity though, a couple slight sexual situations but nothing at all explicit.
I am interested in reading the sequel, seeing what happens next. Doesn't look like it was ever made into audio, so I'd have to read it on my own. This audio ... I wasn't sure about the drawl in the Dad/Normal/Trevor path, just always felt a little forced to me (I am not an expert in that accent).
I liked this ... didn't love it, as so many others seemed to. I had heard rave reviews about this, and found a hardcopy at the thrift store (that pushes a book up my TBR). While the story kept my interest, I'm not sure how much it will stick in my memory. I went with the audio, which isn't as good for stopping and taking notes, making highlights, but I never really felt that urge (I had the Kindle copy too).
3rd person/Past tense ... broken up into five parts, with 30 chronological chapters running through. The chapters had headings - a phrase and a date. I wish this info was also included in the Table of Contents. To me, it's always interesting to look back over the heads, see what memories the headers can bring up ... both Kindle and Audio just had the basic numbered chapters. The physical book lacks a TOC altogether (I can't comprehend why physical books today leave them out).
1. The Center/2013
2. The Boy Who Would Change the World/1953
3. Love How it Tangles/1953
4. Chained/1953
5. Gafe Ghanadi/1953
6. Bruised Sky/1953
I won't retype all the headers here, just enough to show the idea. Part 1, through Ch13 sticks to 1953. Part 2/Chapter 14 does an unexpected jump ... The Melon Seller's Daughter/1916 ... this shift in POV and setting/time really confused me. It finally connected later on, but I was a little lost here. Chapter 14-15 return to Roya in 1953. Part 3/Chapter 17 shifts to 1956/California. The next chapters move on to the next few years. Part 4/Chapter 21 threw me again, heading was Births/1958 and in print, it was in italics ... who is the POV? Again, I was a little lost, took me a minute to figure out this was Bahman. Was this a letter, a journal entry? Stream-of-consciousness? Part 5/Chapter 23 was another "what is going on" for me ... 2013, Claire. Who is Claire? Oh yes, from the first chapter, she's an administrator at the nursing home, took me a few minutes to make that connection ...
I didn't care for these abrupt and confusing chapters added in within the main story. Yes, it all came together in the end, but it irritated me when it was happening. I didn't care for the "spoiler" at the end of chapter 20 "little did she know that her future held a bigger loss: a loss that would make the summer of 1953 look like child's play" ... I guess things moved pretty quickly in Chapter22, but I knew as soon as a baby was mentioned, that it would end in a loss ...
I never fully connected to the characters. Bahman's mother was just terrible! I liked Roya, Bahman, Walter, but still felt a little a part from all the characters. I wasn't sure how I felt about how everything tied up.
This was clean: No proFanity, no sex. Other words I note: cacophony, ablutions
3rd person/Past tense ... broken up into five parts, with 30 chronological chapters running through. The chapters had headings - a phrase and a date. I wish this info was also included in the Table of Contents. To me, it's always interesting to look back over the heads, see what memories the headers can bring up ... both Kindle and Audio just had the basic numbered chapters. The physical book lacks a TOC altogether (I can't comprehend why physical books today leave them out).
1. The Center/2013
2. The Boy Who Would Change the World/1953
3. Love How it Tangles/1953
4. Chained/1953
5. Gafe Ghanadi/1953
6. Bruised Sky/1953
I won't retype all the headers here, just enough to show the idea. Part 1, through Ch13 sticks to 1953. Part 2/Chapter 14 does an unexpected jump ... The Melon Seller's Daughter/1916 ... this shift in POV and setting/time really confused me. It finally connected later on, but I was a little lost here. Chapter 14-15 return to Roya in 1953. Part 3/Chapter 17 shifts to 1956/California. The next chapters move on to the next few years. Part 4/Chapter 21 threw me again, heading was Births/1958 and in print, it was in italics ... who is the POV? Again, I was a little lost, took me a minute to figure out this was Bahman. Was this a letter, a journal entry? Stream-of-consciousness? Part 5/Chapter 23 was another "what is going on" for me ... 2013, Claire. Who is Claire? Oh yes, from the first chapter, she's an administrator at the nursing home, took me a few minutes to make that connection ...
I didn't care for these abrupt and confusing chapters added in within the main story. Yes, it all came together in the end, but it irritated me when it was happening. I didn't care for the "spoiler" at the end of chapter 20 "little did she know that her future held a bigger loss: a loss that would make the summer of 1953 look like child's play" ... I guess things moved pretty quickly in Chapter22, but I knew as soon as a baby was mentioned, that it would end in a loss ...
I never fully connected to the characters. Bahman's mother was just terrible! I liked Roya, Bahman, Walter, but still felt a little a part from all the characters. I wasn't sure how I felt about how everything tied up.
This was clean: No proFanity, no sex. Other words I note: cacophony, ablutions