Take a photo of a barcode or cover
743 reviews by:
gwentolios
I picked out both 1 and 2 at the same time, but didn't see any numbers and so accidently read this one first. Didn't matter. This flowed really well and I was sucked into the story on the first page. Suck in so badly I have since recommended this to three people in the past 12 hours.
People are asking me to describe this, and it's hard. There are elements of a lot. Harry Potter, Inkspell, a touch of Boy in the Striped Pajamas in the middle, and a heavy dose of mystery. What really captured my attention though are the other little pieces snuck in here and there - news stories, website meta data, side stories - that dive deep into my love of cultural studies.
Tom, Tommy, where's the line between fiction and fact, between imagination and real life, and what happens when a popular culture item becomes so ingrained in a portion of the population? I love literature analysis, and having a story that does that to itself is amazing.
People are asking me to describe this, and it's hard. There are elements of a lot. Harry Potter, Inkspell, a touch of Boy in the Striped Pajamas in the middle, and a heavy dose of mystery. What really captured my attention though are the other little pieces snuck in here and there - news stories, website meta data, side stories - that dive deep into my love of cultural studies.
Tom, Tommy, where's the line between fiction and fact, between imagination and real life, and what happens when a popular culture item becomes so ingrained in a portion of the population? I love literature analysis, and having a story that does that to itself is amazing.
Only an okay read, and for me I think the biggest issue was the prose. This was written in the 80s, writing prose has changed since then, and the style from back then I personally find harder to get through. Lot of description, even if it's just the set up of a room.
Plot wise, this was okay. I guessed early what was going to happen, a twist made me reevaluate that, and then things settled into my original guess. The main character Doyle, was also a little too passive for my taste. Though that might also be because the villains began to see him as a formidable foe even though he wasn't anything special.
There were elements I enjoyed a lot: double time travel, an interesting limitation to magic, the use of Egyptian mythology. I just guess, since I have heard so much about this book, I expected to like it better than I did. But isn't that how it typically goes?
Plot wise, this was okay. I guessed early what was going to happen, a twist made me reevaluate that, and then things settled into my original guess. The main character Doyle, was also a little too passive for my taste. Though that might also be because the villains began to see him as a formidable foe even though he wasn't anything special.
There were elements I enjoyed a lot: double time travel, an interesting limitation to magic, the use of Egyptian mythology. I just guess, since I have heard so much about this book, I expected to like it better than I did. But isn't that how it typically goes?
A decent book, but not anything stunning. There are jewels of prose scattered throughout it, and I loved the build up around White Knights. Plot wise however I found it slow enough that I would go weeks between readings, and only kept going because I was bound and determined to finish it before the year's end for the sake of my Goodreads Reading Challenge.
The romantic dilemma is what interested me the most - a witch who only eats raw flesh with a curse that makes the man she loves really appetizing and a knight who gains power and protection from his chastity. It didn't crop up until maybe a third, close to half way through the book, but I did love how it was resolved. Not at all what I expected.
The romantic dilemma is what interested me the most - a witch who only eats raw flesh with a curse that makes the man she loves really appetizing and a knight who gains power and protection from his chastity. It didn't crop up until maybe a third, close to half way through the book, but I did love how it was resolved. Not at all what I expected.
I've never really read mystery books, I find the genre more entertaining on TV than on paper, but I really enjoyed this book. I didn't expect how a lot of the plots were wrapped up, and there were a bunch of layers of relationships between the characters and the places in London.
The best part is simply Peter Grant. He has a roll your eyes attitude at things and a flat sort of humor. Okay, this is a British book so maybe it's just British humor, but the sort of non-nonchalance he gives to killing vampires and the bureaucratic of the London police makes him solid. He knows parts of what he's doing is crazy and makes no sense , like sniffing dead bodies for traces of magic, and quite regularly makes sarcastic comments about his job like how the London police greeting is 'Oi! What do you think you're doing?'. Grant's also a secret geek, calling Nightingale Harry Potter and joking about magic coming form midi-clorians.
Despite how fantastical the case is, the way it's solved is pure non-fiction. There are disputes between police departments, lots of searching through paperwork, and wrong guesses. This is not one of those quick cases, it takes Grant and Co roughly six months to figure out who is causing people's faces to fall off and stop them.
I'll be honest, this isn't a quick read. It's a decent sized book and while the story moves it didn't grab me to the point where I'd sit and read for hours. But it was constantly in my head and thoughts of Grant's case were never far from my mind. It's a great read to use when you have a lot of actual work to do, because it serves as little vacation from grading papers and lesson planning without sucking you in too deep to not break off and get back to you job to finish by the end of the day.
The best part is simply Peter Grant. He has a roll your eyes attitude at things and a flat sort of humor. Okay, this is a British book so maybe it's just British humor, but the sort of non-nonchalance he gives to killing vampires and the bureaucratic of the London police makes him solid. He knows parts of what he's doing is crazy and makes no sense , like sniffing dead bodies for traces of magic, and quite regularly makes sarcastic comments about his job like how the London police greeting is 'Oi! What do you think you're doing?'. Grant's also a secret geek, calling Nightingale Harry Potter and joking about magic coming form midi-clorians.
Despite how fantastical the case is, the way it's solved is pure non-fiction. There are disputes between police departments, lots of searching through paperwork, and wrong guesses. This is not one of those quick cases, it takes Grant and Co roughly six months to figure out who is causing people's faces to fall off and stop them.
I'll be honest, this isn't a quick read. It's a decent sized book and while the story moves it didn't grab me to the point where I'd sit and read for hours. But it was constantly in my head and thoughts of Grant's case were never far from my mind. It's a great read to use when you have a lot of actual work to do, because it serves as little vacation from grading papers and lesson planning without sucking you in too deep to not break off and get back to you job to finish by the end of the day.