Take a photo of a barcode or cover
226 reviews by:
dorothysbookshelf
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
kae is a genius. i cannot wait to devour more of their work, because wow. i think this poem has forever changed me - i am not the same person as i was before i read this
i’m just echoing the ideas present in other reviews: it’s itromic that the text is ‘feminism for the 99%’ but it is inaccessible to the masses due to academic language.
other than the writing, it was a very good manifesto which i learnt a lot from, although it calls for a reread or two to fully understand it.
other than the writing, it was a very good manifesto which i learnt a lot from, although it calls for a reread or two to fully understand it.
a lot of the ideas discussed i really liked and aligned well with feminist theory, such as the idea of internal guilt due to gender expectations, which is pushed onto women throughout their lives (guilt at being “bossy”, guilt at being “intimidating”, guilt at being “too feminine”, etc.), and i liked the perspective adichie offered
however, the book gets such a low rating for three main reasons.
firstly, as said by @doublebookedclub, this text does not feel revolutionary, and the knowledge presented was overtly simple and overpraised i felt that it was a very introductory text to not feminist theory or thinking, but an introduction to binary gender equality. simple does not mean accesible, and accesible doesn’t always mean simple. accesible leftist texts are so important, but this felt quite ‘corporate feminism’ and surface-level.
secondly, the writing style was lacklustre, remaining far too anecdotal without providing enough relevant information for the anecdote to be proved valuable to the text. this links to how simple the knowledge presented was.
lastly, the book itself is quite cisheteronormative, very focused on the biology of women, coming close to reducing women to their reproductive abilities - not a very feminist angle for a famous feminist text. this contradicted the statement she made in the text about the importance of language. however the text was written in 2012-2014, which explains the lack of inclusivity, but this fact doesn’t make the book inherently better, just allows me as a reviewer and you as a reader of this review to take it into consideration when making a judgement
emotional
inspiring
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
god damn that ending stung
emotional
hopeful
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
not in the mood for a mystery right now, will come back for it
challenging
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced