chelseareads's Reviews (449)

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
informative reflective slow-paced

Very basic, but a good orienting book for beginners.
emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
hopeful informative reflective slow-paced

It was too long. I was feeling a 5-star review until I was about 2/3 finished with the book. It does have some beautifully poetic chapters, wonderful insight, and creative storytelling. 
informative reflective medium-paced

This book is also for beginners! As a beginner/newcomer to the practice(s), it was helpful. I listened to the audiobook, which was narrated well by the author, and then I bought the book for reference. I appreciated the information on rock/crystal hardness, the information about closed practices and herbs to avoid for conservation purposes, and the explanation of sigils.
informative reflective medium-paced

As a *very* beginner, this was super helpful in orienting me to the new world of wicca/witchcraft. It's exactly what you would expect/hope from a beginner book.
dark mysterious slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Very slow. Very Ishiguro. Interesting concept, though, and reading it in French gave me enough motivation to finish it.
challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

In typical French (language) lit style, it's a slow burn. 
informative reflective medium-paced

Down from 5 stars because of the inconsistency in storytelling (lots of skimming through parts of life that would be interesting to hear more about, and then dwelling in other areas when we've already gotten what we were going to get out of that) and some clunky writing.