the audiobook i was listening to was just too fucked up 

Charlotte is a better person than me I would have knocked those kids out the second they pulled out that Halloween costume

What am I supposed to say? How does one review Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter? How do I begin this?

I guess I will start by saying I watched the movie first. My partner had an Abraham Lincoln phase for like 3 years when they were younger, so when we were doing a movie marathon on Letterboxd and found out that it fit the criteria for the list we were following and watched it right away. And I loved it in a "this is so ridiculous, it's tone deaf, it's a white saviour movie, it's perfect." I told everyone I talked to for the following week that they needed to watch the movie because it was truly one of the most entertaining things I had ever watched. 

And I just downloaded Libby and completely coincidentally, it was on the front page of my local library's October reading list. And that's when I found out it was a series. So, when I was promised Jack the Ripper and the JFK assassination in the second one, I obviously needed to read the first one so I could read that one. The book is FAR from the unbelievably insane, kind of camp in a way masterpiece that was the movie. 

Normally, I would be fine with this. I understand this was a ten and a half hour audiobook (the last 20 or 30 minutes is acknowledgements, sources, etc.) and to condense that into a two hour or less movie is going to involve a lot of cuts. And I'm fine with that. It definitely worked in the movie's favour. However, the main difference was that the book was trying to be as historically accurate as possible, while the movie was a blockbuster extravaganza that did whatever the hell it wanted, like having a vampire throw a horse at Abe's head and having his axe also be part gun. 

The problem with trying to be as historically accurate as possible is that this is a white author talking about slavery. And bringing vampires into slavery. And saying the ENTIRE CONFEDERACY WAS VAMPIRES AND THAT WAS WHY THEY WANTED SLAVES SO BAD. And I could accept that for the movie. The movie was not serious at all and I was able to remove myself enough to laugh at it for being tone deaf, but still not let it hinder my experience of the movie. But because the book takes itself so seriously and was so dedicated to historical accuracy, I had a much harder time removing myself from that detail. 

There are a couple more things that I think should have been given another thought, specifically, it should have been shown to some sort of sensitivity reader. These things include: 

I just think maybe these things could potentially be left out of a revised edition. 

Overall, this is a white saviour book and it is incredibly tone deaf, but I think you definitely expect that from the name and the premise alone. It works much better as a movie. It should not have taken itself so seriously. And maybe it should have been written by anyone other than a white man. 

I will, of course, begin listening to the sequel immediately. 

This guy was fucking hilarious what the fuck do you mean the Phantom of the Opera was the worlds first ventriloquist