aaronj21's Reviews (912)

one of the few books that I actually couldn't put down , even though I knew the basic premise having seen the movie. but after reading the novel I have a deep hatred of the film adaptation. my first complaint is how the film portrayes Ian Malcolm , in the book he was an amazing , almost prophetic , mathmetician , in the movie he is a childish, unimportant character whose largest contribution to the film is hitting on ellie sattler. he provided the thought provoking arguments that made the book , in the movie they cut these into nice , short, inconspicuaous sentences. I really enjoyed his discussion with hammond about the nature and limits of science and progress , these were barely in the movie. my second complaint against the film is the portyal of Hammond. one of my favourite scenes in the book is where hammond begins thinking about his next park, even though this one killed half of the people involved. he then stumbles down a hill and is promptly eaten by scavenger dinos , that was a "Ha take that!" moment if ever there was one. in the movie he repents and flies off into the sunset to a happy ending. so basically what universal studios did was strip the work of all its meaningfull dialogue and philosophical debates , and kind of lesson , and the darker side of human nature. what you are left with is a movie that became popular solely to it's then cutting edge technology , and numerous action sequences. so there you have it , read the novel , watch the film , despise the film. not much of a "book" review was it?

before I start just let me say that reading this book was a big deal for me. once upon a time , when i was five , i saw the movie "It" based on the novel of the same name. needless to say it scared the bejesus outta me and i've had mild to moderate Coulrophobia ever since. so reading the book was a not just reading another novel for me. and now the review. i genuinley liked this book. as a horror novel it did it's work well ( haha! "It" , I know bad pun ) , i lost many nights sleep over this book. even the parts without Pennywise scared me , especially the vampire in the library, ( * shudders * , nightmares). so , props on another scary book mr.King. but even outside of the horror it was good. ocassionaly i thought i sensed some Ray Bradbury(ness?) in there , especially toward the very in when bill is riding Silver and thinking about childhood. and the way the band of losers stood together and stuck up for one another was truly touching , i actually got "emotional" during the scene of the "Apocalyptic rock fight". so over all great book . Now , as to why there are only 4 stars next to this title. i only have to things i didn't like about this book , Lovecrafty(ness?) , and a certian little incident in the sewers. first off , stephen king wins for describing a city as " Lovecrafty". but the whole "it" , "turtle" , "other" deal was a little too much.throughtout the whole novel pennywise is basically your standard monster , evil , creepy , powerful, and he , oh excuse me "It" , has a weakness , silver. then at the end its a interdeminsional being that has one true form that the human mind can't really see so it substitutes a gaint spider. and then theres the turtle and the deadlights and the other , personally i think it was scary when it was just a shape shhifting , semi immortal clown thing. and the sewer incident , need i say more , why king? , why? but he's the authour and it's his work and i can't touch that. and that is why there are only 4 stars. but still awesome book , a real page turner , better than the shinning.