Take a photo of a barcode or cover
octavia_cade 's review for:
Roses and Rot
by Kat Howard
I really enjoyed this. It's not perfect - my usual dislike of fairyland aside, while the women characters were fascinating in their own ways I found absolutely all of the men crashing bores, which is a problem when the two primary male characters are the love interests of the truly fantastic pair of sisters who are the heart of the story. I kept thinking "Come on you two! You can do better than this, surely!" Also a bit frustrating are the short glimpses of Imogen's supposedly genius fairy tales, which are really pretty average - this would be less of a problem if the mentor character didn't gush so over them; it made me doubt her taste and sense. Oddly (despite the first person) when Howard isn't trying to convey Imogen's work the writing is much better, I thought.
Still the women's characterization is excellent, the relationship between the sisters is excellent, and the language is lovely. I think this is a first novel? Very assured if so - and if Howard writes more I'll definitely be reading them.
I can only hope those future books make out in the cover art stakes better than this though, because that's a truly uninspiring cover and R&R deserves so much better. Was Saga trying to spin this very interesting story as "worthy but dull as ditchwater"?
Still the women's characterization is excellent, the relationship between the sisters is excellent, and the language is lovely. I think this is a first novel? Very assured if so - and if Howard writes more I'll definitely be reading them.
I can only hope those future books make out in the cover art stakes better than this though, because that's a truly uninspiring cover and R&R deserves so much better. Was Saga trying to spin this very interesting story as "worthy but dull as ditchwater"?