Take a photo of a barcode or cover
ninetalevixen 's review for:
A Tale for the Time Being
by Ruth Ozeki
(Reread for my "Intro to 21st Century Literature" class.)
2.5 stars
Nope, I don't like this any better now, almost three years later, having to take notes to discuss it three times a week; on an enjoyment scale it's somewhere in the 1-2 star range, though I have to give it credit for how brilliantly it's constructed. Though to be fair, some of my annoyance was probably pure resentment over having to reread.
I actively disliked most of the characters, truth be told, and I wasn't particularly interested in the plot. There were a lot of fascinating ideas, but I felt like the follow-through was half-hearted in too many places. The twists and reveals weren't satisfying or satisfyingly dissatisfying, they kind of just ... were. (And weren't. Same thing.)
content warnings:
rep:
-----------
CONVERSION: 6.8 / 15 = 2.5 stars
Prose: 4 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 5 / 10
Emotional Impact: 1 / 10
Development / Flow: 4 / 10
Setting: 7 / 10
Diversity & Social Themes: N/A
Intellectual Engagement: 4 / 5
Originality / Trope Execution: N/A
Rereadability: 2 / 5
Memorability: 2 / 5
-----------
[2017 review]
2.75 stars.
It took quite a while for this book to grow on me — as is probably evident from my exasperated statuses — but I did want to like this book since it came highly recommended by a close friend. I did eventually come to like Nao and Ruth and all the others, and there were some interesting philosophical themes.
2.5 stars
Nope, I don't like this any better now, almost three years later, having to take notes to discuss it three times a week; on an enjoyment scale it's somewhere in the 1-2 star range, though I have to give it credit for how brilliantly it's constructed. Though to be fair, some of my annoyance was probably pure resentment over having to reread.
I actively disliked most of the characters, truth be told, and I wasn't particularly interested in the plot. There were a lot of fascinating ideas, but I felt like the follow-through was half-hearted in too many places. The twists and reveals weren't satisfying or satisfyingly dissatisfying, they kind of just ... were. (And weren't. Same thing.)
content warnings:
Spoiler
suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, bullying, mentions of animal abuse, major character death(s), precanon parent death (cancer & Alzheimer's)rep:
Spoiler
Japanese-American MC, implied-genderqueer Japanese-American MC, Japanese major characters, major characters with mental illness-----------
CONVERSION: 6.8 / 15 = 2.5 stars
Prose: 4 / 10
Characters & Relationships: 5 / 10
Emotional Impact: 1 / 10
Development / Flow: 4 / 10
Setting: 7 / 10
Diversity & Social Themes: N/A
Intellectual Engagement: 4 / 5
Originality / Trope Execution: N/A
Rereadability: 2 / 5
Memorability: 2 / 5
-----------
[2017 review]
2.75 stars.
It took quite a while for this book to grow on me — as is probably evident from my exasperated statuses — but I did want to like this book since it came highly recommended by a close friend. I did eventually come to like Nao and Ruth and all the others, and there were some interesting philosophical themes.