peristome's profile picture

peristome 's review for:

4.0
dark reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

The Picture of Dorian Gray is a beautiful contradiction. That might not make a lot of sense, but I'll try to explain: the language is dense and flowery but the story is not. The story is meandering and slow-paced but the language races from thought to thought, like a never-ending stream of consciousness. I completely understand the urge to give this book 5 stars, list a bunch of (admittedly gorgeous) quotes, and move on. However, I just don't feel like I can do that. The beginning of this book dragged on and on. It took me forever to get through the first 60%, and only a few days to get through the last 40%. The last little chunk is where the book really kicked into gear and events actually started to happen.

That is not to say the first 60% is without merit. It is a fantastic character study of a young man that gets sucked into the vortex of depravity. Even though this book was written over 130 years ago at this point, it is still an apt examination of grooming, the ways it can happen, and what it does to a person. The relationship between Dorian and Lord Henry was legitimately uncomfortable to read at times. It made me feel glum. I do recognize that this is the point, however. Dorian's corruption isn't supposed to sit right with us, and there are no good people in this story.

I do have one other major grip with the book...
how does Sybil know Dorian's name?! She only called him Prince Charming previously and her brother made a huge deal about her not even knowing his name, but after she acts badly, she suddenly knows it?
I will not ignore plot holes even for revered classics!
I supposed we are supposed to infer that he told her his name at some point and maybe she decided to keep it a secret? But we really should have been told this information, considering how often Wilde goes on tangents about other useless information.


I can appreciate what this book did for literature as whole, and especially queer literature. I was honestly surprised at how gay this book was from the very beginning—although I probably shouldn't have been, given the circumstances of Oscar Wilde's trial and death. I can appreciate that there are no heroes in this story. The way Dorian goes from being corrupted to corrupting those around him is extremely well done, and once again, great commentary on the human condition that still rings true today. I can appreciate that the prose is stunning (I highlighted so much of this book). My favorite passage is quite long; it is about the wish to wake up to a world that is different than how you left it. Wilde is a master at using language to set the scene so vividly, as if he was painting it in our minds. 

There are few of us who have not sometimes wakened before dawn, either after one of those dreamless nights that make us almost enamoured of death, or one of those nights of horror and misshapen joy, when through the chambers of the brain sweep phantoms more terrible than reality itself, and instinct with that vivid life that lurks in all grotesques, and that lends to Gothic art its enduring vitality, this art being, one might fancy, especially the art of those whose minds have been troubled with the malady of reverie. Gradually white fingers creep through the curtains, and they appear to tremble. In black fantastic shapes, dumb shadows crawl into the corners of the room and crouch there. Outside, there is the stirring of birds among the leaves, or the sound of men going forth to their work, or the sigh and sob of the wind coming down from the hills and wandering round the silent house, as though it feared to wake the sleepers and yet must needs call forth sleep from her purple cave. Veil after veil of thin dusky gauze is lifted, and by degrees the forms and colours of things are restored to them, and we watch the dawn remaking the world in its antique pattern. The wan mirrors get back their mimic life. The flameless tapers stand where we had left them, and beside them lies the half-cut book that we had been studying, or the wired flower that we had worn at the ball, or the letter that we had been afraid to read, or that we had read too often. Nothing seems to us changed. Out of the unreal shadows of the night comes back the real life that we had known. We have to resume it where we had left off, and there steals over us a terrible sense of the necessity for the continuance of energy in the same wearisome round of stereotyped habits, or a wild longing, it may be, that our eyelids might open some morning upon a world that had been refashioned anew in the darkness for our pleasure, a world in which things would have fresh shapes and colours, and be changed, or have other secrets, a world in which the past would have little or no place, or survive, at any rate, in no conscious form of obligation or regret, the remembrance even of joy having its bitterness and the memories of pleasure their pain.

This is just something to keep in mind: if you read this book, there is likely going to be a lot of references and words you don't know. I know this was true in my case. I am not holding this fact against the book—in fact, I quite enjoyed this aspect, although it did slow me down—but I am saying this is something most people will have to prepare for. I was often taking 20-30 minute breaks every other page to go on a deep dive into one historical event or other. I would also recommend tandem reading this book with the audiobook. Hearing the words out loud really helps when the language is as archaic as this.

I do believe everyone should at least try to read this book. It took me a while to really get into it, but once I did, I had a great time. The book leaves you with a lot of think about, even this far removed from when it was written. 

P.S. This has taught me that my 12 classics in 12 months challenge might be harder than I thought. 😫