This book annoyed me at times. I've put it down several times to go and do something else, but I kept coming back to it, and not just because I had nothing to do over the weekend.

Samantha Kidd is attacked in a parking lot. The next day a fire starts at a fashion show in the same building. Kidd gets blamed for ruining the show. What? Rational people don't think this way. They don't blame the victim of one event of being the reason the other event happened.

Why would the hot photographer need to use Kidd's darkroom if he insists on using film to make pictures? You'd think he has his own darkroom.
Why would you even for a moment think the sister of the model started the fire? The first thing to catch fire was the kimono of the model. If the sister started the fire to protect the model, would she really start by setting fire to her sister?

Why didn't the arson inspector find the evidence of how the fire was started? He inspected the crime scene long before Kidd did.

Car antennas break when you hang onto them with your full-body weight.