Take a photo of a barcode or cover
emberology 's review for:
L.A. Noir: Nine Dark Visions of the City of Angels
by William Hare
Abandoned. "Detailed discussion" means something else to me than long plot synopses (sometimes even of movies that aren't the topic of the chapter), irrelevant details, repetition (do I really need to know more than once that Lancaster had blonde hair and he was a former acrobat?), glaring errors, sloppy and jumbled writing, and very little of actual analysis.
Oh, and Los Angeles as a noir setting? Only an afterthought, which is the opposite what the blurb implies.
Oh, and Los Angeles as a noir setting? Only an afterthought, which is the opposite what the blurb implies.