You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
shona_reads_in_devon 's review for:
The Poppy War
by R.F. Kuang
challenging
dark
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
πΎππ π
ππππ'π π
ππππππππ πππ'π πππππ. πΎππ π
πππππππππ πππ πππππππ.
πΎππ πππ πππ π πππ π πππ ππ π πππππππ? π·ππππππ πππππππ. π·ππππππ ππππ.
__________________________
I'm in two minds about this book.
On the one hand - it has a lot of stuff I'm really a fan of. It's Asian history, it's using fantasy elements to explore a darker side of history. It's shining a light on an important and oft ignored part of Asian history. It's dealing with some big moral questions and grappling with uncomfortable and seriously large topics. I love fantasy that does all that. It's got a strong and bloodthirsty FMC, it's got found family (as far as grimdark goes!) It's got morally grey choices and uncontrollable dark powers.
All really great. So why am I struggling with my rating?
I've said about Kuang before, I think I suffer in my reading of these novels of hers because I do have a solid grounding in a lot of areas of history. I feel like I'm frequently being spoon fed stuff. None of this felt remotely subtle to me. The parallels with real life events (Nanjing, Hiroshima) are really quite explicit. Now I don't have a problem with this from a moral or ethical standpoint and the arguments that you wouldn't get away with it for Western atrocities doesn't hold weight for me. Rather it's more a question of imagination. I like to have to work a bit at making the parallels and there was none of that here. I also found it tricky to connect to any of the characters really. I'm not sure if this was a pacing problem, or whether I just didn't feel they were particularly well drawn. For its length, we don't get a lot of character development aside from our two main characters.
Having said all of that, I still enjoyed the story and I'll continue with the trilogy, I'm interested in what happens to Rin and I'm hoping for more connection as the novel progresses.
πΎππ πππ πππ π πππ π πππ ππ π πππππππ? π·ππππππ πππππππ. π·ππππππ ππππ.
__________________________
I'm in two minds about this book.
On the one hand - it has a lot of stuff I'm really a fan of. It's Asian history, it's using fantasy elements to explore a darker side of history. It's shining a light on an important and oft ignored part of Asian history. It's dealing with some big moral questions and grappling with uncomfortable and seriously large topics. I love fantasy that does all that. It's got a strong and bloodthirsty FMC, it's got found family (as far as grimdark goes!) It's got morally grey choices and uncontrollable dark powers.
All really great. So why am I struggling with my rating?
I've said about Kuang before, I think I suffer in my reading of these novels of hers because I do have a solid grounding in a lot of areas of history. I feel like I'm frequently being spoon fed stuff. None of this felt remotely subtle to me. The parallels with real life events (Nanjing, Hiroshima) are really quite explicit. Now I don't have a problem with this from a moral or ethical standpoint and the arguments that you wouldn't get away with it for Western atrocities doesn't hold weight for me. Rather it's more a question of imagination. I like to have to work a bit at making the parallels and there was none of that here. I also found it tricky to connect to any of the characters really. I'm not sure if this was a pacing problem, or whether I just didn't feel they were particularly well drawn. For its length, we don't get a lot of character development aside from our two main characters.
Having said all of that, I still enjoyed the story and I'll continue with the trilogy, I'm interested in what happens to Rin and I'm hoping for more connection as the novel progresses.